Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF THE SYMPTOM TREE MODEL FOR PROCESS FAULT DIAGNOSIS
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 1993, 10(1), 28-35(8), 10.1007/BF02697374
Download PDF
Abstract
The Symptom Tree Model(STM) has been studied extensively as a model for fault diagnosis in chemical processes and has been applied to real processes. In this study, a program to build a model, AUSST(Automatic Synthesis of the Symptom Tree model), which generates the STM automatically is developed. The input information supplied to AUSST includes the process topology and the unit model library. The unit model library is represented in the form of mini-fault trees which and be constructed systematically through qualitative abstraction from the mathematical model or the operation data and experienced operators. AUSST has worked well, the generated symptom trees describe the paths of fault propagation sufficiently and contain all the possible primal faults. AUSST helps to assure the accuracy the accuracy of the STM as well as managing the STM consistently. It is expected that AUSST reduces the engineering efforts required to develop a fault diagnostic system for a new process.
References
Isermann R, Automatica, 20, 387 (1984)
Kuipers B, Artific. Intell., 29, 289 (1986)
Kuipers B, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 17, 432 (1987)
Fussell JB, NATO Advanced Study Institute on Generic Techniques in Systems Reliability Assessment, Nordhoff (1973)
Powers GJ, Tomkins FC, AIChE J., 20, 376 (1974)
Martin-Solis GA, Andow PK, Lees FP, Trans. IChemE, 60, 14 (1982)
Han JH, Yoon ES, IFAC Workshop on Fault Detection and Safety in Chemical Plants, Kyoto, 126 (1986)
Kim CJ, Oh JK, Yoon ES, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 28(4), 417 (1990)
Oh JK, Yoon ES, Choi BN, KACC, 2, 805 (1989)
Iri M, Aoki E, O'Shima E, Matsuyama H, Comput. Chem. Eng., 3, 489 (1979)
Kramer MA, Palowitch BL, AIChE J., 33, 1067 (1987)
Oyeleye OO, Finch FE, Kramer MA, Chem. Eng. Commun., 96, 205 (1990)
Lapp SA, Powers GJ, IEEE Trans. Reliab., 26, 2 (1977)
Shafaghi A, Andow PK, Lees FP, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 62, 101 (1984)
Yoon ES, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1982)
Nam DS, M.S. Thesis, SNU (1992)
Kuipers B, Artific. Intell., 29, 289 (1986)
Kuipers B, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 17, 432 (1987)
Fussell JB, NATO Advanced Study Institute on Generic Techniques in Systems Reliability Assessment, Nordhoff (1973)
Powers GJ, Tomkins FC, AIChE J., 20, 376 (1974)
Martin-Solis GA, Andow PK, Lees FP, Trans. IChemE, 60, 14 (1982)
Han JH, Yoon ES, IFAC Workshop on Fault Detection and Safety in Chemical Plants, Kyoto, 126 (1986)
Kim CJ, Oh JK, Yoon ES, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 28(4), 417 (1990)
Oh JK, Yoon ES, Choi BN, KACC, 2, 805 (1989)
Iri M, Aoki E, O'Shima E, Matsuyama H, Comput. Chem. Eng., 3, 489 (1979)
Kramer MA, Palowitch BL, AIChE J., 33, 1067 (1987)
Oyeleye OO, Finch FE, Kramer MA, Chem. Eng. Commun., 96, 205 (1990)
Lapp SA, Powers GJ, IEEE Trans. Reliab., 26, 2 (1977)
Shafaghi A, Andow PK, Lees FP, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 62, 101 (1984)
Yoon ES, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1982)
Nam DS, M.S. Thesis, SNU (1992)