Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
A TDS STUDY ON THE REACTION INTERMEDIATES IN THE CATALYZED GASIFICATION OF ACTIVATED CHARCOAL
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, April 1993, 10(2), 78-84(7), 10.1007/BF02697398
Download PDF
Abstract
Catalytic coal gasification was studied by using thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) under high vacuum conditions. Activated charcoal was used as a model compound of coal, and Na2CO3 and K2CO3 as catalysts. Catalysts enhanced oxygen adsorption and decomposed at temperatures below their own decomposing temperatures. After pretreatment of the catalyst at high temperature the CO2 desorption pattern represented characteristics of reaction intermediates. There were two peaks, -peak and -peak, in CO2 TDS curves. From the experimental results, -peak was interpreted to the result from intercalatd metal-carbon (M-C) complex, and -peak from metal-oxygen (M-O-C) complex. A higher pretreatment temperature led to decrease both the number of M-O-C complex and its thermal stability. The increase of catalyst loading in Na2CO3-containing sample resulted in relative increase of the number of M-O-C complex than that of intercalated M-C complex, and also increase of thermal stabilities of both reaction intermediates. Major difference between K2CO3 and Na2CO3 appeared in -peak, intercalated M-C complex. That is, the contribution of intercalated metal-carbon complex to total reaction intermediates was larger in K2CO3 than Na2CO3. This could be attributed mainly to the better intercalating ability of potassium due to its lower ionization potential.
References
Wen WY, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 22, 1 (1980)
Choi YK, Moon SH, Lee HI, Lee WY, Rhee HK, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 30(3), 292 (1992)
Choi YK, Moon SH, Lee HI, Lee WY, Rhee HK, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 30(4), 415 (1992)
Wood BJ, Sancier KM, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 26, 233 (1984)
Wigmans T, vanDoorn J, Moulijn JA, Fuel, 62, 190 (1983)
Huhn F, Klein J, Juntgen H, Fuel, 62, 196 (1983)
Mckee DW, Chatterji D, Carbon, 13, 381 (1975)
Mckee DW, Chem. Phys. Carbon, 16, 1 (1981)
Hashimoto K, Miura K, Xu JJ, Watanabe A, Masukami H, Fuel, 65, 489 (1986)
Yokoyama S, Miyahara K, Tanaka K, Tashiro T, Takakawa I, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi, 6, 974 (1980)
Yokoyama S, Miyahara K, Tanaka K, Tashiro T, Takakawa I, Fuel, 58, 510 (1979)
Wen WY, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 22, 1 (1980)
Wigmans T, Goebel JC, Moulijn JA, Carbon, 21, 295 (1983)
Hashimoto K, Miura K, Xu JJ, 1987 Int. Conf. Coal Sci., 533 (1987)
Johnson JL, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 14, 131 (1976)
Choi YK, Moon SH, Lee HI, Lee WY, Rhee HK, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 30(3), 292 (1992)
Choi YK, Moon SH, Lee HI, Lee WY, Rhee HK, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 30(4), 415 (1992)
Wood BJ, Sancier KM, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 26, 233 (1984)
Wigmans T, vanDoorn J, Moulijn JA, Fuel, 62, 190 (1983)
Huhn F, Klein J, Juntgen H, Fuel, 62, 196 (1983)
Mckee DW, Chatterji D, Carbon, 13, 381 (1975)
Mckee DW, Chem. Phys. Carbon, 16, 1 (1981)
Hashimoto K, Miura K, Xu JJ, Watanabe A, Masukami H, Fuel, 65, 489 (1986)
Yokoyama S, Miyahara K, Tanaka K, Tashiro T, Takakawa I, Nippon Kagaku Kaishi, 6, 974 (1980)
Yokoyama S, Miyahara K, Tanaka K, Tashiro T, Takakawa I, Fuel, 58, 510 (1979)
Wen WY, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 22, 1 (1980)
Wigmans T, Goebel JC, Moulijn JA, Carbon, 21, 295 (1983)
Hashimoto K, Miura K, Xu JJ, 1987 Int. Conf. Coal Sci., 533 (1987)
Johnson JL, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 14, 131 (1976)