ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received October 9, 2002
Accepted February 20, 2003
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Prediction of Gas Flow Directions in Gas Assisted Injection Molding When Cavities and Runners Are Involved

Department of Chemical Engineering, Daegu University, Kyungsan, Gyeongbuk 712-714, Korea
khlim@daegu.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2003, 20(3), 592-599(8), 10.1007/BF02705571
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

In the prediction of gas flow-direction for gas-assisted injection molding (GAIM), the statement “Gas goes to the direction of the last area to fill with resin” has been accepted as a correct one. When there exists more than one area to fill with resin, a mold design engineer for GAIM technologies has to determine to which direction gas goes that commercial software for GAIM (e.g., Moldflow) may be utilized for its mold design. However commercial software is generally expensive and is sometimes hard to become familiar with. As a rule of thumb, it is suggested that the resistance to the initial velocity of melt polymer at the nearest geometry to a gas injection point should be used as its criterion since gas goes in the direction of least resistance to initial resin-velocity. Neither the flow rate nor the resistance to flow rate can be a criterion in the prediction. Thus the statement “Gas goes to the direction of the least resistance to flow rates” should be corrected to “More flow rate goes to the direction of the least resistance to flow_x000D_ rates.” The rule of thumb suggested in this paper was verified by using commercial software, Moldflow, in the prediction of gas flow directions in GAIM under geometries where cavities and runners were involved. When the ratio of initial resin-velocity is so close to unity it is proposed as the adapted rule of thumb to calculate new emerging resinvelocities and resistances to resin-velocity at the first coming change of diameters in series of pipes and to compare those for upper and lower sides each other to predict the gas direction. Thus the judgment as to which point is the point where gas starts to choose a preferred direction is very important in the prediction.

References

Chen SC, Cheng NT, Hsu KS, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 22, 319 (1995) 
Chen SC, Cheng NT, Hsu KS, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 38, 335 (1996) 
Chen SC, Hsu KF, Hsu KS, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 39(14), 2957 (1996) 
Chen SC, Cheng NT, Chao SM, Int. Polym. Process., 14, 90 (1998)
Gao DM, Nguyen KT, Garcia R, Salloum G, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 69, 282 (1997) 
Khayat RE, Derdouri A, Hebert LP, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 57(2-3), 253 (1995) 
Lim KH, Soh YS, J. Injection Molding Technol., 3, 31 (1999)
McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriot P, "Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering," 4th ed., McGraw-Hill Press (1986)
Parez MA, Ong NS, Lam YC, Tor SB, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 121, 27 (2002) 
Shen YK, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 24, 295 (1997) 
Shen YK, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 28, 139 (2001) 
Soh YS, Lim KH, SPE ANTEC Tec. Papers, 60, 482 (2002)
Soh YS, J. Reinforced Plast. Compos., 19, 955 (2000) 

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로