Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received March 21, 2003
Accepted November 18, 2003
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Improvement in Steam Stripping of Sour Water through an Industrial-Scale Simulation
Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31 Hyoja-Dong, Pohang 790-784, Korea
iblee@postech.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2004, 21(3), 549-555(7), 10.1007/BF02705486
Download PDF
Abstract
Sour water containing hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, and ammonia is mainly purified by steam stripping. Increased concern in recent times over effluent water quality and energy saving has caused sour water stripping to attract considerable attention. However, the development of the operation methodology and structure of this process has not been systemic, leading to inefficiencies in the systems commonly used. In this paper, the characteristics of a sour water stripping column are investigated by using an industrial-scale simulation. From these_x000D_
results, we propose several guidelines (high feed temperature, low composition of CO2 in the feed, need of rectifying section, low mass flow rate of the second recycle stream, high reflux ratio, and modified structure using a pump-around side cooler) for improving stripper performance through changes in the operating condition and process structure. The proposed structure and guidelines can be applied not only to reduce steam consumption and lower the ammonia concentration in the effluent water but also to operate the system stably.
References
Aspen Plub® Electrolytes Manual, Aspen Technology Inc. (1998)
Darton RC, Grisven PFA, Simon MM, Chem. Eng., Dec., 923 (1978)
Hassan SQ, Timberlake DL, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 42, 936 (1992)
Hoogendooren GC, Abellon RD, Essens PJM, Wesselingh JA, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 66, 483 (1988)
Hwang YL, Keller GE, Olson JD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1753 (1992)
Isla MA, Irazoqui HA, Cerda J, Hydrocarb. Process., 68, 65 (1989)
Lee D, Lee JM, Lee SY, Lee IB, Trans. IChemE, 80(A), 167 (2002)
Melin GA, Niedzwiecki JL, Goldstein AM, Chem. Eng. Prog., 71, 78 (1975)
Oh M, Moon I, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(3), 231 (1998)
Park KY, Kang TW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(1), 29 (1995)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(4), 539 (1999)
Stein C, Elster J, Heine I, Sachse J, Peper H, Oil Gas-Eur. Magazine, 24, 36 (1988)
Walker GJ, Hydrocarb. Process., 48, 121 (1969)
Darton RC, Grisven PFA, Simon MM, Chem. Eng., Dec., 923 (1978)
Hassan SQ, Timberlake DL, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 42, 936 (1992)
Hoogendooren GC, Abellon RD, Essens PJM, Wesselingh JA, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 66, 483 (1988)
Hwang YL, Keller GE, Olson JD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1753 (1992)
Isla MA, Irazoqui HA, Cerda J, Hydrocarb. Process., 68, 65 (1989)
Lee D, Lee JM, Lee SY, Lee IB, Trans. IChemE, 80(A), 167 (2002)
Melin GA, Niedzwiecki JL, Goldstein AM, Chem. Eng. Prog., 71, 78 (1975)
Oh M, Moon I, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(3), 231 (1998)
Park KY, Kang TW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(1), 29 (1995)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(4), 539 (1999)
Stein C, Elster J, Heine I, Sachse J, Peper H, Oil Gas-Eur. Magazine, 24, 36 (1988)
Walker GJ, Hydrocarb. Process., 48, 121 (1969)