Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received June 22, 2004
Accepted October 11, 2004
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Production of Ethyl tert-Butyl Ether from tert-Butyl Alcohol and Ethanol Catalyzed by β-Zeolite in Reactive Distillation
Suttichai Assabumrungrat†
Darin Wongwattanasate
Varong Pavarajarn
Piyasan Praserthdam
Amornchai Arpornwichanop1
Shigeo Goto2
Center of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand 1Control and Systems Engineering,Department of Chemical Engineering,Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
Suttichai.A@eng.chula.ac.th
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, November 2004, 21(6), 1139-1146(8), 10.1007/BF02719485
Download PDF
Abstract
The synthesis of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) from a liquid phase reaction between tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) and ethanol (EtOH) in reactive distillation has been studied. β-Zeolite catalysts with three compositions (Si/Al ratio=13, 36 and 55) were compared by testing the reaction in a semi-batch reactor. Although they showed almost the same performance, the one with Si/Al ratio of 55 was selected for the kinetic and reactive distillation studies because it is commercially available and present in a ready-to-use form. The kinetic parameters of the reaction determined by fitting parameters with the experimental results at temperature in the range of 343-363 K were used in an ASPEN PLUS simulator. Experimental results of the reactive distillation at a standard condition were used to validate a rigorous reactive distillation model of the ASPEN PLUS used in a simulation study. The effects of various operating parameters such as condenser temperature, feed molar flow rate, reflux ratio, heat duty and mole ratio of H2O : EtOH on the reactive distillation performance were then investigated via simulation using the ASPEN PLUS program. The results were compared between two reactive distillation columns: one packed with β-zeolite and the other with conventional Amberlyst-15. It was found that the effect of various operating parameters for both types of catalysts follows the same trend; however, the column packed with β-zeolite outperforms that with Amberlyst-15 catalyst due to the higher selectivity of the catalyst.
References
Assabumrungrat S, Kiatkittipong W, Srivitoon N, Praserthdam P, Goto S, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 34, 292 (2002)
Borade RH, Clearfield A, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 6729 (1992)
Bisowarno BH, Tade MO, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(6), 1950 (2000)
Chang JH, Yoo JK, Ahn SH, Lee KH, Ko SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(1), 28 (1998)
Cunill F, Vila M, Izquierdo JF, Iborra M, Tejero J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 564 (1993)
Matouq M, Quitain AT, Takahashi K, Goto S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(3), 982 (1996)
Norris JF, Rigby GW, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 54, 2088 (1932)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(3), 280 (1999)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(4), 539 (1999)
Seo Y, Hong WH, Hong TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(5), 556 (1999)
Sneesby MG, Tade MO, Datta R, Smith TN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1855 (1997)
Sneesby MG, Tade MO, Smith TN, J. Process Control, 9(1), 19 (1999)
Tade MO, Tian YC, Sep. Purif. Technol., 19, 85 (2000)
Yang BL, Goto S, Sep. Sci. Technol., 32(5), 971 (1997)
Yang BL, Yang SB, Yao RQ, React. Funct. Polym., 44(2), 167 (2000)
Yang B, Yang S, Wang H, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34, 1160 (2001)
Yin X, Yang B, Goto S, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 27, 1065 (1995)
Borade RH, Clearfield A, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 6729 (1992)
Bisowarno BH, Tade MO, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(6), 1950 (2000)
Chang JH, Yoo JK, Ahn SH, Lee KH, Ko SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(1), 28 (1998)
Cunill F, Vila M, Izquierdo JF, Iborra M, Tejero J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 564 (1993)
Matouq M, Quitain AT, Takahashi K, Goto S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(3), 982 (1996)
Norris JF, Rigby GW, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 54, 2088 (1932)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(3), 280 (1999)
Quitain A, Itoh H, Goto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 32(4), 539 (1999)
Seo Y, Hong WH, Hong TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(5), 556 (1999)
Sneesby MG, Tade MO, Datta R, Smith TN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1855 (1997)
Sneesby MG, Tade MO, Smith TN, J. Process Control, 9(1), 19 (1999)
Tade MO, Tian YC, Sep. Purif. Technol., 19, 85 (2000)
Yang BL, Goto S, Sep. Sci. Technol., 32(5), 971 (1997)
Yang BL, Yang SB, Yao RQ, React. Funct. Polym., 44(2), 167 (2000)
Yang B, Yang S, Wang H, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34, 1160 (2001)
Yin X, Yang B, Goto S, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 27, 1065 (1995)