Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received March 17, 2005
Accepted May 26, 2005
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Pervaporation of Flavors with Hydrophobic Membrane
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
krlee@kangwon.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, September 2005, 22(5), 735-739(5), 10.1007/BF02705791
Download PDF
Abstract
Using a pervaporation process, a surface-modified hydrophobic membrane was used for recovery of esters which are volatile organic flavor compounds; ethyl acetate (EA), propyl acetate (PA), and butyl acetate (BA). A surfacemodified tube-type membrane was used to evaluate the effects of the feed concentration (0.15-0.60 wt%) and feed temperature (30-50 ℃) on the separation of EA, PA, and BA from dilute aqueous solutions. The permeation flux increased with the increasing feed ester concentration and operating temperature. EA, PA, and BA in the permeate were concentrated up to 9.13-32.26, 11.44-34.95, and 14.96-36.37 wt%, respectively. The enrichment factors for the 0.15-0.60 wt% feed solution of EA and BA were in the range of 48.5-62.8 and 97.7-101.5, respectively. Phase separation occurred in the permeate stream because the ester concentration in the permeate was above the saturation limit. This meant that selectivity of the membrane was high enough for the recovery of esters from dilute aqueous solution, even though the enrichment factor of the membrane was lower than that of non-porous PDMS membrane. The fluxes of EA, PA, and BA at 0.60 wt% (6,000 ppm) feed concentration and 40 ℃ were 254, 296, and 318 g/m2·hr, which are much higher than those obtained with polymer membranes. In the case of non-porous PDMS at feed concentrations of 90-4,800 ppm and at 45 ℃, it was reported that the permeate flux of EA was 1.1-5.8 g/m2·h. Compared to non-porous PDMS, the surface-modified membrane investigated in this study showed a much higher flux and enough selectivity of esters.
Keywords
References
Baudot A, Marin M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(11), 4458 (1999)
Baudot A, Marin M, Trans. IchemE C (Food Bioprod. Process), 75, 117 (1997)
Baudot A, Souchon I, Marin M, J. Membr. Sci., 158(1-2), 167 (1999)
Beaumelle D, Marin M, Chem. Eng. Process., 33(6), 449 (1994)
Baker RW, Wijmans JG, Athayde AL, Daniels R, Ly JH, Le M, J. Membr. Sci., 137(1-2), 159 (1997)
Charalambous G, Inglett GE, Flavor of Foods and Beverages, Chemistry and Technology, New York (1978)
Chang JH, Yoo JK, Ahn SH, Lee KH, Ko SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(1), 28 (1998)
Feng XS, Huang RY, J. Membr. Sci., 118(1), 127 (1996)
Heath HB, Pharm B, Flavor Technology, AVI, London (1978)
Ho CT, Tan CT, Tong CH, Flavor Technology, Physical Chemistry, Modification, and Process, American Chemical Society (1995)
Olsson J, Tragardh G, J. Membr. Sci., 187(1-2), 23 (2001)
Rajagopalan N, Cheryan M, J. Membr. Sci., 104(3), 243 (1995)
Song KH, Song JH, Lee KR, Sep. Purif. Technol., 30(2), 169 (2003)
Song KM, Hong YK, Yu J, Hong WH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(2), 290 (2002)
Sampranpiboon P, Jiraratananon R, Uttapap D, Feng X, Huang RYM, J. Membr. Sci., 173(1), 53 (2000)
Yeom CK, Dickson JM, Brook MA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 13(5), 482 (1996)
Won JM, Bae SY, Ha BH, Kim HT, Dumazawa H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 13(3), 324 (1996)
Baudot A, Marin M, Trans. IchemE C (Food Bioprod. Process), 75, 117 (1997)
Baudot A, Souchon I, Marin M, J. Membr. Sci., 158(1-2), 167 (1999)
Beaumelle D, Marin M, Chem. Eng. Process., 33(6), 449 (1994)
Baker RW, Wijmans JG, Athayde AL, Daniels R, Ly JH, Le M, J. Membr. Sci., 137(1-2), 159 (1997)
Charalambous G, Inglett GE, Flavor of Foods and Beverages, Chemistry and Technology, New York (1978)
Chang JH, Yoo JK, Ahn SH, Lee KH, Ko SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(1), 28 (1998)
Feng XS, Huang RY, J. Membr. Sci., 118(1), 127 (1996)
Heath HB, Pharm B, Flavor Technology, AVI, London (1978)
Ho CT, Tan CT, Tong CH, Flavor Technology, Physical Chemistry, Modification, and Process, American Chemical Society (1995)
Olsson J, Tragardh G, J. Membr. Sci., 187(1-2), 23 (2001)
Rajagopalan N, Cheryan M, J. Membr. Sci., 104(3), 243 (1995)
Song KH, Song JH, Lee KR, Sep. Purif. Technol., 30(2), 169 (2003)
Song KM, Hong YK, Yu J, Hong WH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(2), 290 (2002)
Sampranpiboon P, Jiraratananon R, Uttapap D, Feng X, Huang RYM, J. Membr. Sci., 173(1), 53 (2000)
Yeom CK, Dickson JM, Brook MA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 13(5), 482 (1996)
Won JM, Bae SY, Ha BH, Kim HT, Dumazawa H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 13(3), 324 (1996)