ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received August 24, 2004
Accepted June 20, 2005
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Effect of Different Reduction Methods on the Efficiencies in the Chemical Decontamination Processes

Research Institute for Innovation in Sustainable Chemistry, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan 1Nuclear Power Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI), 103-16 Munji-Dong, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon 305-380, Korea 2Gwangju Branch, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), 300 Yongbong-Dong, Buk-Gu, Gwangju 500-757, Korea
hjlee68@paran.com
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, November 2005, 22(6), 865-872(8), 10.1007/BF02705666
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

Chemical decontamination is considered to be an effective method for reduction of radiation level by dissolution of radioactive corrosion products and metal oxidizing films existing in the primary system of a nuclear power plant. In this study, the process efficiencies of two chemical decontamination processes (Methods 1 and 2) having different reduction steps were investigated through the operation of a semi-pilot scale decontamination equipment as a continuous work. The reduction step for Method 1 employed an adsorbent with an oxygen source, while a reductant (oxalic acid) was used in the reduction step for Method 2. The dissolution and removal efficiencies of metal species and organic compounds in Method 2 were higher than those in Method 1, implying that oxalic acid in the reduction step increased the process efficiency, their complexes of metal species easily being removed in the decomposition/cleanup step. It was shown that the process employing chemical reduction showed higher dissolution and removal efficiencies rather than the process by the physical adsorption on the adsorbent surface through decontamination processes with different reduction step.

References

Ayres JA, Decontamination of Nuclear Reactors and Equipment, Ronald Press, New York (1970)
Choi W, Kim S, Cho S, Yoo HI, Kim MH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(6), 898 (2001)
Dastgheib SA, Rockstraw DA, Carbon, 39, 1849 (2001) 
Faur-Brasquet C, Kadiruvelu K, Le Chloirec P, Carbon, 40, 2387 (1996) 
Frim JA, Rathman JF, Weavers LK, Water Res., 37, 3155 (2003) 
Gregg SJ, Sing KSW, Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, Academic Press, London (1982)
Juang RS, Wang YC, Water Res., 37, 845 (2003) 
Kahlili NR, Campbell M, Sandi G, Golas J, Carbon, 38, 1905 (2000) 
Kim HJ, Moon H, Park HC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2(2), 181 (1985)
Kim K, Lee HJ, Choi M, Kang DW, Inoue S, Nucl. Eng. Des., 229, 91 (2004) 
Kim K, Lee HJ, Kang DW, Inoue S, Nucl. Eng. Des., 223, 329 (2003) 
Kim MH, Lee EK, Jun JH, Han GY, Kong SJ, Lee BK, Lee TJ, Yoon KJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 835 (2003)
Kim SJ, Shim WG, Kim TY, Moon H, Kim SJ, Cho SY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(6), 967 (2002)
Kong SH, Kwon CI, Kim MH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(2), 293 (2003)
Lee HJ, Kang DW, Chi J, Lee DH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(3), 503 (2003)
Lee HJ, Kang DW, Lee YJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 895 (2004)
Lucking F, Koser H, Jank M, Ritter A, Water Res., 32, 2607 (1998) 
Moon JK, Byun KH, Park SY, Oh WZ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 14(6), 521 (1997)
Nowack B, Sigg L, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 177(1), 106 (1996) 
Nowack B, Lutzenkirchen J, Behra P, Sigg L, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2397 (1996) 
Ocken H, Decontamination Handbook, EPRI Report TR-112352, EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), Palo Alto (1999)
Ravikmar JX, Gurol MD, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 394 (1994) 
Ridge AC, Sedlak DL, Water Res., 38, 921 (2004) 
Seco A, Marzal P, Gabaldon C, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 68(1), 23 (1997) 
Song JH, Yeon KH, Cho J, Moon SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(1), 108 (2005)
Toles CA, Marshall WE, Jones MM, Carbon, 35, 1407 (1997) 
Varrin R, Jr., Characterization of PWR Steam Generator Deposits, EPRI Report TR-106048, EPRI, Palo Alto (1996)
Varga K, Baradlai P, Hirschberg G, Nemeth Z, Oravetz D, Schunk J, Tilky P, Electrochim. Acta, 46(24-25), 3783 (2001) 
Warhurst AM, Fowler GD, McConnachie GL, Pollard SJT, Carbon, 35, 1039 (1997) 
Wood CJ, Spalaris CN, Sourcebook for Chemical Decontamination of Nuclear Power Plants, EPRI Special Report NP-6433, EPRI, Palo Alto (1989)
Yim MS, Ocken H, Prog. Nucl. Energy, 39, 31 (2001) 

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로