A two-phase flow configuration in which the gas phase flows upwards while the liquid phase flows downwards is referred to as a counter-current flow pattern. This flow configuration cannot be preserved if any flow rate exceeds a criterion known as the counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) or flooding. Since the CCFL is important to chemical engineers, it has long been studied via experimental and analytical approaches. Most of the previous CCFL experiments in annular channels have been carried out with a small diameter annulus and large gap-to-diameter ratio annulus. The present experiment examines the CCFL in narrow annular channels having gap sizes of 1, 2, 3, and 5 mm. The outer diameter of the annular passage is 500 mm. At a gap size of 1 mm, it was visually observed that a CCFL locally occurred in some region of the periphery while the other region remained in a counter-current flow configuration. The region under partial CCFL condition expanded with an increase in the air flow rate, finally reaching a global CCFL. The air flow rate for the global CCFL was roughly 15% larger than that for initiation of a partial CCFL. This difference in air flow rate between the initiation of a partial CCFL and the global CCFL was reduced as the gap size increased. When the gap size was 5 mm, the partial CCFL was not observed, but onset of flooding led to a global CCFL. Because of the existence of a transient period, the CCFL was experimentally defined as the situation where net water accumulation is sustained. The measured CCFL data are presented in the form of a Wallis’ type correlation. Two length scales, hydraulic diameter and average circumference, were examined as the characteristic length scale. The average circumference appeared to better fit the experimental data, including results reported elsewhere. A new correlation using the average circumference as the characteristic length scale is suggested based on the experimental measurements of the present work and previous reports.

Flooding CCFL Annular Narrow Gap Counter-current Flow Characteristic Length

Imura H, Kusuda H, Funatsu S, Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 79 (1977)
Han DH, Hong WH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(3), 324 (1998)
Cho SY, Lee YY, Kim SJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(3), 313 (1995)
Mayinger F, Weiss P, Wolfert K, Nucl. Eng. Des., 145, 47 (1993)
Lee SC, Mo C, Nam SC, Lee JY, Thermal-hydraulic behaviours and flooding of ECC in DVI systems, KAERI/CM-045/95, KAERI (1995)
Cheng LY, Counter-current flow limitation in thin rectangular channels, BNL-44836, BNL (1990)
Mishima K, Nishihara H, Nucl. Eng. Des., 86, 165 (1985)
Sudo Y, Kaminaga M, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 15, 755 (1989)
Jeong JH, Lee SJ, Park RJ, Kim SB, J. of Korean Nuclear Society, 34(4), 396 (2002)
Celata GP, Farello GE, Furrer M, Cumo M, Flooding experiments in a rectangular geometry, RT/TERM/85/3, ENEA (1985)
Osakabe M, Kawasaki Y, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 15, 747 (1989)
Ruggles AE, Countercurrent flow limited heat flux in the high flux isotope reactor (HFIR) fuel element, ORNL/TM-9662, ORNL (1990)
Mishima K, Boiling burnout at low flow rate and low pressure conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyoto Univ. (1984)
Lee SY, Nuclear Technology, 104, 64 (1993)
Richter HJ, Wallis GB, Speers MS, Effect of scale on twophase countercurrent flow flooding, NUREG/CR-0312, NRC (1979)
Koizumi Y, Nishida H, Ohtake H, Miyashita T, Proceedings of NURETH-8, 1, 48 (1997)
Ragland WA, Minkowycz WJ, France DM, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 10(2), 103 (1989)
Richter HJ, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 7, 647 (1981)
Nakamura H, Koizumi Y, Anoda Y, Tasaka K, Proceedings of 27th National Heat Transfer Symposium of Japan, 964 (1990)
Glaeser H, Nucl. Eng. Des., 133, 259 (1992)
McQuillan KW, Whalley PB, Hewitt GF, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 11(6), 741 (1985)
Roesler S, Groll M, Proc. of 1991 National Heat Transfer Conference, Minnesota, 91 (1991)
Ueda T, Suzuki S, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 4, 157 (1978)
Jeong JH, Park RJ, Kim SB, Heat Mass Transf., 34, 321 (1998)
Osakabe M, Futamata H, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 22(5), 883 (1996)