Steam-methane reforming (SMR) reaction was studied using a tubular reactor packed with NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst to obtain synthesis gases with H2/CO ratios optimal for the production of synthetic diesel fuel from steamhydrogasification of carbonaceous materials. Pure CH4 and CH4-CO2 mixtures were used as reactants in the presence of steam. SMR runs were conducted at various operation parameters. Increasing temperature from 873 to 1,023 K decreased H2/CO ratio from 20 to 12. H2/CO ratio decreased from 16 to 12 with pressure decreasing from 12.8 to 1.7_x000D_ bars. H2/CO ratio also decreased from about 11 to 7 with steam/CH4 ratio of feed decreasing from 5 to 2, the lowest limit to avoid severe coking. With pure CH4 as the feed, H2/CO ratio of synthesis gas could not be lowered to the optimal range of 4-5 by adjusting the operation parameters; however, the limitation in optimizing the H2/CO ratio for synthetic diesel fuel production could be removed by introducing CO2 to CH4 feed to make CH4-CO2 mixtures. This effect can be primarily attributed to the contributions by CO2 reforming of CH4 as well as reverse water-gas shift reaction, which led to lower H2/CO ratio for the synthesis gas. A simulation technique, ASPEN Plus, was applied to verify the consistency between experimental data and simulation results. The model satisfactorily simulated changes of H2/CO ratio versus the operation parameters as well as the effect of CO2 addition to CH4 feed.

Steam-methane Reforming Operation Parameters CO2 Addition to CH4 Feed ASPEN Simulator Optimal H2/CO Ratio

Leiby SM, PEP Report No. 212, SRI International, Menlo park (1994)
Xu J, Froment GF, AIChE J., 35, 88 (1989)
Lee DK, Baek IH, Yoon WL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(4), 931 (2004)
Spath PL, Dayton DC, Technical Report, NREL/TP-510-34929 (2003)
Waszczuk P, Wieckowski A, Zelenay P, Gottesfeld S, Coutanceau C, Leger JM, Lamy C, J. Electroanal. Chem., 511(1-2), 55 (2001)
Semin GL, Belyaev VD, Demin AK, Sobyanin VA, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 181(1), 131 (1999)
Pena MA, Gomez JP, Fierro JL, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 144(1-2), 7 (1996)
Lee SJ, Mukerjee S, Ticianelli EA, McBreen J, Electrochim. Acta, 44(19), 3283 (1999)
Murthy M, Esayian M, Hobson A, MacKenzie S, Lee WK, Van Zee JW, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148(10), A1141 (2001)
Anderson RB, The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Academic Press, New York (1984)
Dry ME, in: Anderson JR, Boudart M, Catalysis Science and Technology, 1, 159 (1981)
Terblanche K, Hydrocarbon Engineering, March/April, 2 (1997)
Jeon SK, Hackett CE, Norbeck JM, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 62, 81 (2003)
Jeon SK, Park C, Hackett C, Norbeck E, Fuel, 86, 2817 (2007)
Bradford MCJ, Vannice MA, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 41(1), 1 (1999)
Effendi A, Zhang ZG, Hellgardt K, Honda K, Yoshida T, Catal. Today, 77(3), 181 (2002)
Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S, AIChE J., 45(2), 248 (1999)
Zhang ZL, Verykios XE, Macdonald SM, Affrossman S, J. Phys. Chem., 100(2), 744 (1996)
Snoeck J, Froment G, Fowles M, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 1, A7, 1 (2003)
Gonzalez O, Lujano J, Pietri E, Goldwasser M, Catalysis Today, 107, 436 (2005)
Twigg MV, Catalyst handbook, Wolfe, London (1989)
Seo YS, Shirley A, Kolaczkowski ST, J. Power Sources, 108(1-2), 213 (2002)
Hardiman KM, Ying TT, Adesina AA, Kennedy EM, Dlugogorski BZ, Chem. Eng. J., 102(2), 119 (2004)
Rostrnp-Nielsen JR, Anderson JR, Boudart M, Catalysis Science and Technology, 5, 1 (1984)
Alstrup I, J. Catal., 109, 241 (1988)