Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received February 11, 2008
Accepted September 22, 2008
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Reactivity study of combustion for coals and their chars in relation to volatile content
Advanced Power Engineering Group, Power Generation Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute, Korea Electric Power Corporation, 103-16 Munji-dong, Yusung-gu, Daejeon 305-380, Korea
jmlee@kepri.re.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 2009, 26(2), 506-512(7), 10.1007/s11814-009-0086-x
Download PDF
Abstract
To determine the effect of volatile matter on combustion reactivity, the pyrolysis and combustion behavior of a set of four (R, C, M and K coals) coals and their chars has been investigated in a TGA (SDT Q600). The maximum reaction temperatures and maximum reaction rates of the coals and their chars with different heating rates (5-20 ℃/min) were analyzed and compared as well as their weight loss rates. The volatile matter had influence on decreasing the maximum reactivity temperature of low and medium rank coals (R, C and M coals), which have relatively high volatiles (9.5-43.0%), but for high rank coal (K coal) the maximum reactivity temperature was affected by reaction surface area rather than by its volatiles (3.9%). When the maximum reaction rates of a set of four coals were compared with those of their chars, the slopes of the maximum reaction rates for the medium rank coals (C and M coals) changed largely rather than those for the high and low rank coals (R and K coals) with increasing heating rates. This means that the fluidity of C and M coals was larger than that of their chars during combustion reaction. Consequently, for C and M coals, the activation energies are lower (24.5-28.1 kcal/mol) than their chars (29.3-35.9 kcal/mol), while the activation energies of R and K coals are higher (25.0-29.4 kcal/mol) than those of their chars (24.1-28.9 kcal/mol).
References
Alonso MJG, Borrego AG, Alvarez D, Menendez A, Fuel Process. Technol., 69(3), 257 (2001)
Yu J, Lucas JA, Wall TF, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33, 135 (2007)
Smith KL, Smoot LD, Fletcher TH, Fundamentals of coal combustion for clean and efficient use, Smoot LD Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 131 (1993)
Yu YH, Kim SD, Lee JM, Lee KH, Energy, 27(5), 457 (2002)
Niksa S, Liu G, Hurt RH, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 29, 425 (2003)
Bak YC, Lee SS, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 41(4), 530 (2003)
Cumming JW, McLughlin J, Thermochim Acta, 57, 253 (1982)
Crelling JC, Skorupska NM, Marsh H, Fuel, 67, 781 (1988)
Alonso MJG, Borrego AG, Alvarez D, Kalkreuth W, Menendez R, Fuel, 80, 1857 (2001)
Kissinger HE, Anal. Chem., 21, 1702 (1987)
Lee JM, Kim YJ, Lee WJ, Kim SD, Energy, 23(6), 475 (1998)
Kim DW, Lee JM, Kim JS, Kim JJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 461 (2007)
Smith SE, Neavel RC, Hippo EJ, Miller RN, Fuel, 60, 458 (1981)
Kimber GM, Gray MD, Combust Flame, 11, 360 (1967)
Berkowitz N, The chemistry of coal, Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier (1985)
Suuberg EM, Sc. D. Thesis, Dept. of Chem. Eng., MIT, USA (1977)
Howard JB, Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydro pyrolysis, Elliott MA Eds., New York, Willey (1981)
Chan ML, Parkyns ND, Thomas KM, Fuel, 70, 447 (1991)
Smith KL, The structure and reaction processes of coal, New York, Plenum Press (1994)
van Krevelen DW, Coal typology chemistry physics constitution, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier (1981)
Solomon PR, Serio MA, Suuberg EM, Prog. Energy Combust Sci., 18, 133 (1992)
Yu J, Lucas JA, Wall TF, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 33, 135 (2007)
Smith KL, Smoot LD, Fletcher TH, Fundamentals of coal combustion for clean and efficient use, Smoot LD Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 131 (1993)
Yu YH, Kim SD, Lee JM, Lee KH, Energy, 27(5), 457 (2002)
Niksa S, Liu G, Hurt RH, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 29, 425 (2003)
Bak YC, Lee SS, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 41(4), 530 (2003)
Cumming JW, McLughlin J, Thermochim Acta, 57, 253 (1982)
Crelling JC, Skorupska NM, Marsh H, Fuel, 67, 781 (1988)
Alonso MJG, Borrego AG, Alvarez D, Kalkreuth W, Menendez R, Fuel, 80, 1857 (2001)
Kissinger HE, Anal. Chem., 21, 1702 (1987)
Lee JM, Kim YJ, Lee WJ, Kim SD, Energy, 23(6), 475 (1998)
Kim DW, Lee JM, Kim JS, Kim JJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 461 (2007)
Smith SE, Neavel RC, Hippo EJ, Miller RN, Fuel, 60, 458 (1981)
Kimber GM, Gray MD, Combust Flame, 11, 360 (1967)
Berkowitz N, The chemistry of coal, Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier (1985)
Suuberg EM, Sc. D. Thesis, Dept. of Chem. Eng., MIT, USA (1977)
Howard JB, Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydro pyrolysis, Elliott MA Eds., New York, Willey (1981)
Chan ML, Parkyns ND, Thomas KM, Fuel, 70, 447 (1991)
Smith KL, The structure and reaction processes of coal, New York, Plenum Press (1994)
van Krevelen DW, Coal typology chemistry physics constitution, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier (1981)
Solomon PR, Serio MA, Suuberg EM, Prog. Energy Combust Sci., 18, 133 (1992)