Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received May 6, 2008
Accepted December 15, 2008
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Simulation of DME synthesis from coal syngas by kinetics model
Division of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon 443-749, Korea 1Institute for Advanced Engineering, Wonchun-dong, Suwon 443-749, Korea
htkim@ajou.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2009, 26(3), 641-648(8), 10.1007/s11814-009-0107-9
Download PDF
Abstract
DME (Dimethyl Ether) has emerged as a clean alternative fuel for diesel. There are largely two methods for DME synthesis. A direct method of DME synthesis has been recently developed that has a more compact process than the indirect method. However, the direct method of DME synthesis has not yet been optimized at the face of its performance: yield and production rate of DME. In this study it is developed a simulation model through a kinetics model of the ASPEN plus simulator, performed to detect operating characteristics of DME direct synthesis. An overall DME_x000D_
synthesis process is referenced by experimental data of 3 ton/day (TPD) coal gasification pilot plant located at IAE in Korea. Supplying condition of DME synthesis model is equivalently set to 80 N/m3 of syngas which is derived from a coal gasification plant. In the simulation it is assumed that the overall DME synthesis process proceeds with steadystate, vapor-solid reaction with DME catalyst. The physical properties of reactants are governed by Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) EOS in this model. A reaction model of DME synthesis is considered that is applied with the LHHW_x000D_
(Langmuir-Hinshelwood Hougen Watson) equation as an adsorption-desorption model on the surface of the DME catalyst. After adjusting the kinetics of the DME synthesis reaction among reactants with experimental data, the kinetics of the governing reactions inner DME reactor are modified and coupled with the entire DME synthesis reaction. For validating simulation results of the DME synthesis model, the obtained simulation results are compared with experimental_x000D_
results: conversion ratio, DME yield and DME production rate. Then, a sensitivity analysis is performed by effects of operating variables such as pressure, temperature of the reactor, void fraction of catalyst and H2/CO ratio of supplied syngas with modified model. According to simulation results, optimum operating conditions of DME reactor are obtained in the range of 265-275 ℃ and 60 kg/cm2. And DME production rate has a maximum value in the range of 1-1.5 of H2/CO ratio in the syngas composition.
Keywords
References
Goo YH, Han MW, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 42, 44 (2003)
Fujimoto K, Asami K, Shikada T, Tominaga H, Chemistry Letters, 2051 (1984)
Ohno Y, Omiya M, 12th ICCS-November 2003 Coal Conversion into DME (2003)
DME handbook, Ohmsha (2006)
Villa P, Frozatti, Buzzi-Ferraris G, Garone G, Pasquon I, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 24, 12 (1985)
Klier K, Chatikavanij V, Herman RG, Simons GW, Journal of Catalyst (1982)
Seyfert W, Luft G, Dhem-Ing-Tech., 57, 482 (1980)
Dybkjaer I, NATO conference on chemical reactor design and technology, Canada (1988)
Nie ZG, Liu HW, Liu DH, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 14, 22 (2005)
Zhang HT, Cao FH, Liu DH, Journal of East China University of Sci. & Tech., 27, 198 (2001)
Sun Q, Liu CW, Pan W, Zhu QM, Deng JF, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 171(2), 301 (1998)
Soave G, Chemical Engineering Science, 27, 1197 (1972)
Graaf GH, Sijtsema PJJM, Stamhuis EJ, Joosten GEH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 41, 2883 (1986)
ASPEN plus 2006 Manual, ASPEN Tech (2006)
Yoo YD, Lee SJ, Yun Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(2), 350 (2007)
Peng XD, Toseland BA, Tijm PJA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(13-14), 2787 (1999)
Fujimoto K, Asami K, Shikada T, Tominaga H, Chemistry Letters, 2051 (1984)
Ohno Y, Omiya M, 12th ICCS-November 2003 Coal Conversion into DME (2003)
DME handbook, Ohmsha (2006)
Villa P, Frozatti, Buzzi-Ferraris G, Garone G, Pasquon I, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 24, 12 (1985)
Klier K, Chatikavanij V, Herman RG, Simons GW, Journal of Catalyst (1982)
Seyfert W, Luft G, Dhem-Ing-Tech., 57, 482 (1980)
Dybkjaer I, NATO conference on chemical reactor design and technology, Canada (1988)
Nie ZG, Liu HW, Liu DH, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 14, 22 (2005)
Zhang HT, Cao FH, Liu DH, Journal of East China University of Sci. & Tech., 27, 198 (2001)
Sun Q, Liu CW, Pan W, Zhu QM, Deng JF, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 171(2), 301 (1998)
Soave G, Chemical Engineering Science, 27, 1197 (1972)
Graaf GH, Sijtsema PJJM, Stamhuis EJ, Joosten GEH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 41, 2883 (1986)
ASPEN plus 2006 Manual, ASPEN Tech (2006)
Yoo YD, Lee SJ, Yun Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(2), 350 (2007)
Peng XD, Toseland BA, Tijm PJA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(13-14), 2787 (1999)