Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received April 14, 2009
Accepted July 27, 2009
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Optimal operation of the integrated district heating system with multiple regional branches
Department of Chemical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Seoul National University of Technology, Seoul 135-743, Korea
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2010, 27(1), 6-18(13), 10.1007/s11814-009-0348-7
Download PDF
Abstract
This paper presents an optimal management model for structural and operational optimization of an integrated district heating system (DHS) with multiple regional branches. A DHS consists of energy suppliers and consumers, district heating pipelines and heat storage facilities in a region. The integrated DHS considered in this paper consists of 11 regional DHS branches. In the optimal management system, production and consumption of heat, transport and storage of heat at each regional DHS are taken into account. The optimal management system is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP), where the objective is to minimize the overall cost or to maximize the profits of the integrated DHS by generating electricity while satisfying the operation constraints of heat units and networks, as well as fulfilling heating demands from consumers. Evaluation of the operation cost is based on daily operations for two months (during August and December) at each DHS located in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do in Korea. Results of numerical simulations show the increase of energy efficiency due to the introduction of the present optimal_x000D_
operation system.
Keywords
References
Benonysson A, Bohn B, Ravn HF, Energy Conversion and Management, 36, 297 (1995)
Aringhieri R, Malucelli F, Annals of Operations Research, 120, 173 (2003)
Sjodin J, Henning D, Appl. Energy, 78(1), 1 (2004)
Soderman J, Pettersson F, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, 1400 (2006)
Carrion M, Arroyo J, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21, 1371 (2006)
Naser AT, Husam A, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 9, 235 (2007)
Delarue E, D’haeseleer W, Advanced priority listing versus mixed integer programming in solving the unit commitment problem, Submitted to Energy (2007)
Afshar K, Ehsan M, Fotuhi-firuzabad M, Amjady N, Appl. Math. Comput., 196, 752 (2008)
Aringhieri R, Malucelli F, Annals of Operations Research, 120, 173 (2003)
Sjodin J, Henning D, Appl. Energy, 78(1), 1 (2004)
Soderman J, Pettersson F, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, 1400 (2006)
Carrion M, Arroyo J, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 21, 1371 (2006)
Naser AT, Husam A, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 9, 235 (2007)
Delarue E, D’haeseleer W, Advanced priority listing versus mixed integer programming in solving the unit commitment problem, Submitted to Energy (2007)
Afshar K, Ehsan M, Fotuhi-firuzabad M, Amjady N, Appl. Math. Comput., 196, 752 (2008)