Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received August 14, 2009
Accepted November 3, 2009
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Multiple effects of operating variables on heat transfer in three-phase slurry bubble columns
School of Bio and Applied Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Korea 1Synfuel Research Group, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 305-343, Korea
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 2010, 27(3), 1015-1020(6), 10.1007/s11814-010-0155-1
Download PDF
Abstract
Characteristics of heat transfer were investigated in pressurized slurry bubble column reactors whose diameter was either 0.051, 0.076, 0.102 or 0.152 m (ID) and 1.5 m in height, respectively. Effects of gas velocity (U(G)), solid contents (S(C)), pressure (P), liquid viscosity (μ(L)) and column diameter (D) on the heat transfer coefficient (h) between the immersed vertical heater and the column were determined. Multiple effects such as U(G) and D, P and D, μ(L) and D, and S(C) and D on the value of heat transfer coefficient were discussed. Temperature fluctuations were also measured and analyzed by adapting chaos theory, which was used to explain the effects of operating variables on the heat transfer in the column. The heat transfer coefficient increased with increasing gas velocity, pressure or solid content in the slurry phase, but decreased with increasing liquid viscosity or column diameter. The decrease trend of h with increasing column_x000D_
diameter was somewhat sensitive when the gas velocity was relatively high (U(G)≥12 cm/s). The effects of column diameter on the h value became almost linear when the operating pressure (P=4-10 kgf /cm2), liquid viscosity (μ(L)=20-38 mPa·s) or solid content in the slurry phase (S(C)=10-20 wt%) was relatively high and gas velocity was relatively low, within these experimental conditions. The heat transfer coefficient was well correlated in terms of dimensionless groups as well as operating variables.
Keywords
References
Fan LS, Gas-liquid-solid fluidization engineering, Butterworth,Boston (1989)
Deckwer WD, Bubble column reactor, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1992)
Kim SD, Kang Y, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(21-22), 3639 (1997)
Drahos J, Bradka F, Puncochar M, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 4069 (1992)
Fan LT, Kang Y, Neogi D, Yashima M, AIChE J., 39, 513 (1993)
Cho YJ, Kim SJ, Nam SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(21-22), 6107 (2001)
Kim SD, Kang Y, Kwon HK, AIChE J., 32, 1397 (1986)
Krishna R, Deswart JW, Ellenberger J, Martina GB, Maretto C, AIChE J., 43(2), 311 (1997)
Shin IS, Son SM, Kim UY, Kang Y, Kim SD, Jung H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 587 (2009)
Krishna R, Sie ST, Fuel Process. Technol., 64(1-3), 73 (2000)
Behkish A, Lemoine R, Sehabiague L, Oukaci R, Morsi BI, Chem. Eng. J., 128(2-3), 69 (2007)
Maretto C, Krishna R, Catal. Today, 52(2-3), 279 (1999)
Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim KI, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(2), 411 (2000)
Kang SH, Son SM, Kang Y, Bae JW, Jun KW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(4), 897 (2008)
Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(21), 4887 (1999)
Kim JS, Woo KJ, Kang Y, Nam CH, Kim SD, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34(2), 185 (2001)
Son SM, Shin IS, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(5), 866 (2007)
Kim UY, Son SM, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(5), 892 (2007)
Son SM, Lee KI, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, AIChE J., 53(11), 3011 (2007)
Kim JS, Woo KJ, Kang Y, Nam CH, Kim SD, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34(2), 185 (2001)
Grassberger P, Procaccia I, Physica. D., 9, 189 (1983)
Deckwer WD, Bubble column reactor, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1992)
Kim SD, Kang Y, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(21-22), 3639 (1997)
Drahos J, Bradka F, Puncochar M, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 4069 (1992)
Fan LT, Kang Y, Neogi D, Yashima M, AIChE J., 39, 513 (1993)
Cho YJ, Kim SJ, Nam SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(21-22), 6107 (2001)
Kim SD, Kang Y, Kwon HK, AIChE J., 32, 1397 (1986)
Krishna R, Deswart JW, Ellenberger J, Martina GB, Maretto C, AIChE J., 43(2), 311 (1997)
Shin IS, Son SM, Kim UY, Kang Y, Kim SD, Jung H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 587 (2009)
Krishna R, Sie ST, Fuel Process. Technol., 64(1-3), 73 (2000)
Behkish A, Lemoine R, Sehabiague L, Oukaci R, Morsi BI, Chem. Eng. J., 128(2-3), 69 (2007)
Maretto C, Krishna R, Catal. Today, 52(2-3), 279 (1999)
Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim KI, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(2), 411 (2000)
Kang SH, Son SM, Kang Y, Bae JW, Jun KW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(4), 897 (2008)
Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(21), 4887 (1999)
Kim JS, Woo KJ, Kang Y, Nam CH, Kim SD, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34(2), 185 (2001)
Son SM, Shin IS, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(5), 866 (2007)
Kim UY, Son SM, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(5), 892 (2007)
Son SM, Lee KI, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, AIChE J., 53(11), 3011 (2007)
Kim JS, Woo KJ, Kang Y, Nam CH, Kim SD, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 34(2), 185 (2001)
Grassberger P, Procaccia I, Physica. D., 9, 189 (1983)