Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received October 4, 2010
Accepted August 3, 2011
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Influence of operating temperature on CO2-NH3 reaction in an aqueous solution
Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 program), KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Korea 1Department of Chemical Engineering Education, Chungnam National University, 79, Daehang-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-764, Korea 2Chemical Research Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 71-2, Jang-dong, Yusong-gu, Daejeon 305-343, Korea
jnkim@kier.re.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, April 2012, 29(4), 478-482(5), 10.1007/s11814-011-0203-5
Download PDF
Abstract
Although aqueous ammonia solution has been focused on the removal of CO2 from flue gas, there have been very few reports regarding the underlying analysis of the reaction between CO2 and NH3. In this work, we explored the reaction of CO2-NH3-H2O system at various operating temperatures: 40℃ , 20℃ , and 5℃ . The CO2 removal efficiency and the loss of ammonia were influenced by the operating temperatures. Also, infrared spectroscopy measurement was used in order to understand the formation mechanism of ion species in absorbent, such as NH2COO6(-), HCO3^(-), CO32^(-), and NH4+, during CO2, NH3, and H2O reaction. The reactions of CO2-NH3-H2O system at 20 ℃ and 40 ℃ have similar reaction routes. However, a different reaction route was observed at 5 ℃ compared to the other operating temperatures, showing the solid products of ammonium bicarbonates, relatively. The CO2 removal efficiency and the formation of carbamate and bicarbonate were strongly influenced by the operating temperatures. In particular, the analysis of the formation carbamate and bicarbonate by infrared spectroscopy measurement provides useful information on the reaction mechanism of CO2 in an aqueous ammonia solution.
References
Yeh AC, Bai H, Sci. Total Environ., 228, 121 (1999)
Bonenfant D, Mimeault M, Hausler R, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(14), 3179 (2003)
Bai HL, Yeh AC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(6), 2490 (1997)
Huang HP, Chang SG, Dorchak T, Energy Fuels, 16(4), 904 (2002)
Lee BD, Kim DM, Cho J, Park SW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22, 818 (2009)
Seo Y, Jo SH, Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Ryu CK, Yi CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 457 (2007)
Lee DH, Choi WJ, Moon SJ, Ha SH, Kim IG, Oh KJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(2), 279 (2008)
Kim YJ, You JK, Hong WH, Yi KB, Ko CH, Kim JN, Sep. Sci. Technol., 43(4), 766 (2008)
Yeh JT, Resnik KP, Rygle K, Pennline HW, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(14-15), 1533 (2005)
Kozak F, Petig A, Morris E, Rhudy R, Thimsen D, Energy Procedia., 1, 1419 (2009)
Pilot scale of CO2 capture, www.powerspan.com.
Park H, Jung YM, You JK, Hong WH, Kim JN, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112(29), 6558 (2008)
You JK, Park H, Yang SH, Hong WH, Shin W, Kang JK, Yi KB, Kim JN, J. Phys. Chem. B, 112(14), 4323 (2008)
Park SY, Yi KB, Ko CH, Park JH, Kim JN, Hong WH, Energy Fuels., 24, 3704 (2010)
Li XN, Hagaman E, Tsouris C, Lee JW, Energy Fuels, 17(1), 69 (2003)
Meng L, Burris S, Bui H, Pan WP, Anal. Chem., 77, 5947 (2005)
Mani F, Peruzzini M, Stoppioni P, Green Chem., 8, 995 (2006)
Guennoun Z, Pietri N, Couturier-Tamburelli I, Aycard JP, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110(24), 7738 (2006)
Khanna RK, Moore MH, Spectrochim. Acta A., 55, 961 (1999)
Wen NP, Brooker MH, J. Phys. Chem., 99(1), 359 (1995)
Hisatsune IC, Can. J. Chem., 62, 945 (1984)
Bonenfant D, Mimeault M, Hausler R, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(14), 3179 (2003)
Bai HL, Yeh AC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(6), 2490 (1997)
Huang HP, Chang SG, Dorchak T, Energy Fuels, 16(4), 904 (2002)
Lee BD, Kim DM, Cho J, Park SW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22, 818 (2009)
Seo Y, Jo SH, Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Ryu CK, Yi CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 457 (2007)
Lee DH, Choi WJ, Moon SJ, Ha SH, Kim IG, Oh KJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(2), 279 (2008)
Kim YJ, You JK, Hong WH, Yi KB, Ko CH, Kim JN, Sep. Sci. Technol., 43(4), 766 (2008)
Yeh JT, Resnik KP, Rygle K, Pennline HW, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(14-15), 1533 (2005)
Kozak F, Petig A, Morris E, Rhudy R, Thimsen D, Energy Procedia., 1, 1419 (2009)
Pilot scale of CO2 capture, www.powerspan.com.
Park H, Jung YM, You JK, Hong WH, Kim JN, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112(29), 6558 (2008)
You JK, Park H, Yang SH, Hong WH, Shin W, Kang JK, Yi KB, Kim JN, J. Phys. Chem. B, 112(14), 4323 (2008)
Park SY, Yi KB, Ko CH, Park JH, Kim JN, Hong WH, Energy Fuels., 24, 3704 (2010)
Li XN, Hagaman E, Tsouris C, Lee JW, Energy Fuels, 17(1), 69 (2003)
Meng L, Burris S, Bui H, Pan WP, Anal. Chem., 77, 5947 (2005)
Mani F, Peruzzini M, Stoppioni P, Green Chem., 8, 995 (2006)
Guennoun Z, Pietri N, Couturier-Tamburelli I, Aycard JP, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110(24), 7738 (2006)
Khanna RK, Moore MH, Spectrochim. Acta A., 55, 961 (1999)
Wen NP, Brooker MH, J. Phys. Chem., 99(1), 359 (1995)
Hisatsune IC, Can. J. Chem., 62, 945 (1984)