Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received December 14, 2011
Accepted September 8, 2012
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Synthesis gas and char production from Mongolian coals in the continuous devolatilization process
Jong-Soo Bae1 2
Dong-Wook Lee1
Se-Joon Park1
Young-Joo Lee1
Jai-Chang Hong1
Choon Han2
Young-Chan Choi1†
1Clean Fuel Department, High Efficiency and Clean Energy Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), 71-2, Jang-dong, Yuseong, Daejeon 305-343, Korea 2Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University, 447-1, Wolgye-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-701, Korea
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, February 2013, 30(2), 321-326(6), 10.1007/s11814-012-0153-6
Download PDF
Abstract
Devolatilization of Mongolian coal (Baganuur coal (BC), Shievee Ovoo coal (SOC), and Shievee Ovoo dried coal (SOC-D)) was investigated by using bench-sized fixed-bed and rotary kiln-type reactors. Devolatilization was assessed by comparing the coal's type and dry basis, temperature, gaseous flux, tar formation/generation, devolatilization rate, char yield, heating value, and the components of the raw coal and char. In the fixed bed reactor, higher temperatures increased the rate of devolatilization but decreased char production. BC showed higher rates of devolatilization and char yields than SOC or SOC-D. Each coal showed inversely proportional devolatilization and char yields, though the relation was not maintained between the different coal samples because of their different contents of inherent moisture, ash, fixed carbon, and volatile matter. Higher temperatures led to the formation of less tar, though with more diverse components that had higher boiling points. The coal gas produced from all three samples contained more hydrogen and less carbon dioxide at higher temperatures. Cracking by multiple functional groups, steam gasification of char or volatiles, and reforming of light hydrocarbon gas increased with increasing temperature, resulting in more hydrogen. The water gas shift (WGS) reaction decreased with increasing temperature, reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide. BC and SOC, with retained inherent moisture, produced substantially higher amounts of hydrogen at high temperature, indicating that hydrogen production occurred under high-temperature steam. The continuous supply of steam from coal in the rotary kiln reactor allowed further exploration of coal gas production. Coal gas mainly comprising syngas was generated at 700-800℃ under a steam atmosphere, with production greatest at 800 ℃. These results suggest that clean char and high value-added syngas can be produced simultaneously through the devolatilization of coal at lower temperature at atmospheric pressure than the entrained-bed type gasification temperature of 1,300-1,600 ℃.
Keywords
References
Leckel D, Fuel Process. Technol., 92, 5 (2011)
Yun YS, Lee SJ, Hong JP, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 5 (2011)
Wang ZC, Shui HF, Gu XP, Gao JS, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 38, 3 (2010)
Survey of energy resources interim update 2009, World Energy Council, London (2009)
Liu Q, Hu H, Zhou Q, Zhu S, Chen G, Fuel., 83, 6 (2004)
Jesper VC, Anders F, Lars C, Fuel., 32 (1995)
Hirajima T, Chan EW, Whiteway SG, Fuel., 65, 6 (1986)
Jamaluddin AS, Truelove JS, Wall TF, Combust. Flame., 63, 3 (1986)
Matsuoka K, Ma ZX, Akiho H, Zhang ZG, Tomita A, Energy Fuels., 17, 4 (2003)
Commandre JM, Lahmidi H, Salvador S, Dupassieux N, Fuel Process. Technol., 92, 5 (2011)
Lu L, Sahajwalla V, Harris D, Energy Fuels., 14, 4 (2000)
Bergins C, Hulston J, Strauss K, Chaffee AL, Fuel, 86(1-2), 3 (2007)
Zhang Y, Kajitani S, Ashizawa M, Oki Y, Fuel., 89, 2 (2010)
Neeft JPA, Knoef HAM, Zielke U, Sjostrom K, Hasler P, Simell PA, Dorrington MA, Thomas L, Abatzoglou N, Deutch S, Greil C, Buffinga GJ, Brage C, Suomalainen M, Guideline for sampling and analysis of tar and particles in biomass producer gases, Version 3.3, Energy Project ERK6-CT1999-20002 (Tar protocol).
Liu ZS, Fuel, 84(1), 5 (2005)
Ibarra JV, Moliner RJ, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 20 (1991)
Solomon PR, Hamblen DG, Carangelo RM, Serio MA, Deshpande GV, Energy Fuels., 2, 4 (1988)
Yun YS, Lee SJ, Hong JP, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 5 (2011)
Wang ZC, Shui HF, Gu XP, Gao JS, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 38, 3 (2010)
Survey of energy resources interim update 2009, World Energy Council, London (2009)
Liu Q, Hu H, Zhou Q, Zhu S, Chen G, Fuel., 83, 6 (2004)
Jesper VC, Anders F, Lars C, Fuel., 32 (1995)
Hirajima T, Chan EW, Whiteway SG, Fuel., 65, 6 (1986)
Jamaluddin AS, Truelove JS, Wall TF, Combust. Flame., 63, 3 (1986)
Matsuoka K, Ma ZX, Akiho H, Zhang ZG, Tomita A, Energy Fuels., 17, 4 (2003)
Commandre JM, Lahmidi H, Salvador S, Dupassieux N, Fuel Process. Technol., 92, 5 (2011)
Lu L, Sahajwalla V, Harris D, Energy Fuels., 14, 4 (2000)
Bergins C, Hulston J, Strauss K, Chaffee AL, Fuel, 86(1-2), 3 (2007)
Zhang Y, Kajitani S, Ashizawa M, Oki Y, Fuel., 89, 2 (2010)
Neeft JPA, Knoef HAM, Zielke U, Sjostrom K, Hasler P, Simell PA, Dorrington MA, Thomas L, Abatzoglou N, Deutch S, Greil C, Buffinga GJ, Brage C, Suomalainen M, Guideline for sampling and analysis of tar and particles in biomass producer gases, Version 3.3, Energy Project ERK6-CT1999-20002 (Tar protocol).
Liu ZS, Fuel, 84(1), 5 (2005)
Ibarra JV, Moliner RJ, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 20 (1991)
Solomon PR, Hamblen DG, Carangelo RM, Serio MA, Deshpande GV, Energy Fuels., 2, 4 (1988)