Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received August 17, 2012
Accepted December 16, 2012
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Enhanced production of carboxymethylcellulase by Cellulophaga lytica LBH-14 in pilot-scale bioreactor under optimized conditions involved in dissolved oxygen
1Department of Medical Bioscience, Graduate School of Dong-A University, Busan 604-714, Korea 2BK21 Bio-Silver Program of Dong-A, Busan 604-714, Korea 3College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hebei 430070, China 4Department of Biotechnology, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University, Busan 604-714, Korea
jwlee@dau.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2013, 30(5), 1105-1110(6), 10.1007/s11814-012-0219-5
Download PDF
Abstract
The optimal conditions for the production of carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) by Cellulophaga lytica LBH-14 at flask scale has been previously reported. In this study, we optimized the parameters involved in dissolved oxygen in 7 and 100 L bioreactors for pilot-scaled production of CMCase by C. lytica LBH-14. The optimal conditions of agitation speed and aeration rate for cell growth in 7 L bioreactors were 395 rpm and 0.98 vvm, whereas those for production of CMCase were 357 rpm and 0.55 vvm. The optimal inner pressures for cell growth and production of CMCase by C. lytica LBH-14 in 100 L bioreactors were 0.00 and 0.06MPa, respectively. The production of CMCase under an optimized inner pressure was 1.38 times higher than that without an inner pressure. The maximal production of CMCase by C. lytica under optimized conditions at pilot scale using rice bran and ammonium chloride was 153.6U/mL, which was 1.39 times higher than that at flask scale.
Keywords
References
Yi JC, Sandra JC, John AB, Shu TC, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 553 (1999)
Tomas-Pejo E, Garcia-Aparicio M, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Ballesteros M, Bioresour. Technol., 100(2), 890 (2009)
Wei GY, Gao W, Jin IH, Yoo SY, Lee JH, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 14, 828 (2009)
Alam MZ, Muyibi SA, Wahid R, Bioresour. Technol., 99(11), 4709 (2008)
Chen H, He Q, Liu L, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 16, 867 (2011)
Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol.Bioprocess Eng., 16, 542 (2011)
Kim HJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 21, 1083 (2011)
Rahulan R, Dhar KS, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A, Bioresour. Technol., 102(17), 8171 (2011)
Thiry M, Cinogolani D, Trends Biotechnol., 20, 103 (2002)
Junker BH, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 97(6), 347 (2004)
Gao W, Kim YJ, Chung CH, Li J, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 20, 1433 (2010)
Gao W, Lee EJ, Lee SU, Li J, Chung CH, Lee JW, J.Microbiol. Biotechnol., 22, 1415 (2012)
Jo KI, Lee YJ, Kim BK, Lee BH, Chung CH, Nam SW, Kim SK, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 13, 182 (2008)
Kim BK, Lee BH, Lee YJ, Jin IH, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 44(6-7), 411 (2009)
Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(3), 384 (2012)
Lejeune R, Baron GV, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 43(2), 249 (1995)
Lee BH, Kim BK, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46(1), 38 (2010)
Lee YJ, Kim HJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol.Bioprocess Eng., 17, 227 (2012)
Bajaj IB, Singhal RS, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 635 (2010)
Elibol M, Ozer D, Process Biochem., 36, 325 (2000)
Li D, Fu X, Kim SM, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 314 (2010)
Tomas-Pejo E, Garcia-Aparicio M, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Ballesteros M, Bioresour. Technol., 100(2), 890 (2009)
Wei GY, Gao W, Jin IH, Yoo SY, Lee JH, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 14, 828 (2009)
Alam MZ, Muyibi SA, Wahid R, Bioresour. Technol., 99(11), 4709 (2008)
Chen H, He Q, Liu L, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 16, 867 (2011)
Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol.Bioprocess Eng., 16, 542 (2011)
Kim HJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 21, 1083 (2011)
Rahulan R, Dhar KS, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A, Bioresour. Technol., 102(17), 8171 (2011)
Thiry M, Cinogolani D, Trends Biotechnol., 20, 103 (2002)
Junker BH, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 97(6), 347 (2004)
Gao W, Kim YJ, Chung CH, Li J, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 20, 1433 (2010)
Gao W, Lee EJ, Lee SU, Li J, Chung CH, Lee JW, J.Microbiol. Biotechnol., 22, 1415 (2012)
Jo KI, Lee YJ, Kim BK, Lee BH, Chung CH, Nam SW, Kim SK, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 13, 182 (2008)
Kim BK, Lee BH, Lee YJ, Jin IH, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 44(6-7), 411 (2009)
Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(3), 384 (2012)
Lejeune R, Baron GV, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 43(2), 249 (1995)
Lee BH, Kim BK, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46(1), 38 (2010)
Lee YJ, Kim HJ, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol.Bioprocess Eng., 17, 227 (2012)
Bajaj IB, Singhal RS, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 635 (2010)
Elibol M, Ozer D, Process Biochem., 36, 325 (2000)
Li D, Fu X, Kim SM, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 314 (2010)