ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received June 18, 2013
Accepted September 11, 2013
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Silver recovery from radiographic film processing effluents by hydrogen peroxide: Modeling and optimization using response surface methodology

1Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran 2Aras’s Dreamers of Science & Industry Company, Iran 3Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Semnan, Semnan, Iran 4Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran 5Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Ahar, Iran 6Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2014, 31(1), 74-80(7), 10.1007/s11814-013-0174-9
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

The recovery of silver from X-ray film processing effluents by precipitation using hydrogen peroxide as the precipitating agent was studied. Response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD) were applied to achieve optimum conditions. Linear, square and interactions effects between parameters to study of a second order polynomial equation were obtained. Optimum condition included the volume of H2O2 0.8 ml/min, pH=5.5, ethylene glycol 9 ml in the experimental condition. In these conditions silver recovery percentage was predicted as 92.8%. The experiment was conducted in triplicate under optimized conditions. Silver recovery percentage and average of precipitate were obtained as 91.5% and 423.19mg, respectively, which were close to the predicted amount achieved by the model.

References

Kononova ON, Kholmogorov AG, Danilenko NV, Goryaeva NG, Shatnykh KA, Kachin SV, Hydrometallurgy., 88, 189 (2007)
Syed S, Suresha S, Sharma LM, Syed AA, Hydrometallurgy., 63, 277 (2002)
Bolorunduro SA, Miner. Eng., 16, 695 (2003)
Nan J, Han D, Yang M, Cui M, Hou X, Hydrometallurgy., 84, 75 (2006)
Pranolo Y, Zhang W, Cheng CY, Hydrometallurgy., 102, 37 (2010)
Park YJ, Fray DJ, J. Hazard. Mater., 164(2-3), 1152 (2009)
Nakiboglu N, Toscal D, Nisli G, Turk. J. Chem., 27, 127 (2003)
Rivera I, Roca A, Cruells M, Patino F, Salinas E, Hydrometallurgy., 89, 89 (2007)
Sathaiyan N, Nandakumar V, Ramachandran P, J. Power Sources, 161(2), 1463 (2006)
Chen JP, Lim LL, Chemosphere., 60, 1384 (2005)
Troupis A, Hiskia A, Papaconstantinou E, Appl. Catal., B 42, 305 (2003)
Stankovic V, Outarra L, Zonnevijlle F, Comninellis C, Sep. Purif. Technol., 61(3), 366 (2008)
Adani KG, Barley RW, Pascoe RD, Miner. Eng., 18, 1269 (2005)
Aktas S, Can. Metall. Q., 47, 37 (2008)
Blais JF, Djedidi Z, Cheikh RB, Tyagi RD, Mercier G, Journal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste., 12, 135 (2008)
Tsakiridis PE, Oustadakis P, Agatzini-Leonardou S, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.03.004 (2013)
Yazici EY, Deveci H, Yazici R, Sep. Sci. Technol., 46(14), 2231 (2011)
Fourcade F, Tzedakis T, Bergel A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(15), 3507 (2003)
Shankar S, More SV, Seeta Laxman R, Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology., 6, 60 (2010)
Ortiz V, Angelica Rubio M, Lissi EA, Atmospheric Environment., 34, 1139 (2000)
Karimi A, Mahdizadeh F, Eskandarian MR, Chem. Ind. Chem.Eng. Q., 18, 89 (2012)
Eskandarian MR, Karimi A, Shabgard MR, J. Taiwan Ins.Chem. Eng., 44, 331 (2013)
Jones CW, Applications of hydrogen peroxide and derivatives, RSC Clean Technology Monographs, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, U.K., 282 (1999)
Bas AD, Yazici EY, Deveci H, Hydrometallurgy., 121-124, 1 (2012)
Bhattacharya SS, Banerjee R, Chemosphere., 73, 81 (2008)
Mohajeri L, Abdul Aziz H, Ali Zahed M, Mohajeri S, Rahman S, Mohamed K, Hasnain Isa M, Water Sci. Technol., 63, 618 (2011)
Ahmadi M, Vahabzadeh F, Bonakdarpour B, Mofarrah E, Mehranian M, J. Hazard. Mater., 123(1-3), 187 (2005)
Karimi A, Mahdizadeh F, Salari D, Vahabzadeh F, Khataee AR, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q., 18, 431 (2012)
Eskandarian MR, Mahdizadeh F, Ghalamchi L, Naghavi S, Desalin. Water Treat., 22, 1 (2013)
Djoudi W, Aissani-Benissad F, Bourouina-Bacha S, Chem. Eng. J., 133(1-3), 1 (2007)
Salehi Z, Vahabzadeh F, Sohrabi M, Fatemi S, Tawfig Zand H, Biodegradation., 21, 645 (2010)
Zarei M, Niaei A, Salari D, Khataee A, J. Hazard. Mater., 173(1-3), 544 (2010)
Anderson M, Whitcomb P, DOE simplified: practical tools for effective experimentation, 2nd Ed., Productivity Press, New York (2007)
Kumar A, Prasad B, Mishra IM, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 87(4), 637 (2009)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로