Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received March 8, 2014
Accepted April 16, 2014
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Solvent screening for the separation of ethylbenzene and p-xylene by extractive distillation
Yukwon Jeon1
Sung Wook Row1 2
Gichun Lee1
Sang Sun Park1
Young-Jong Seo3
Young Hwan Chu4
Yong-Gun Shul1†
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-749, Korea 2GS Engineering & Construction, 33 Jong-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul 110-130, Korea 3The 4th Research Team, Daedeck Research Institute, Lotte Chemical Corp., Jang-dong #24-1, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-726, Korea 4Department of New Energy · Resource Engineering, College of Science & Engineering, Sangji University, 124, Sangjidae-gil, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 220-702, Korea
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, October 2014, 31(10), 1824-1830(7), 10.1007/s11814-014-0115-2
Download PDF
Abstract
Extractive distillation is one of the most effective processes for the separation of ethylbenzene and p-xylene. The goal was to find single solvents or combinations of multi-solvents with good properties while minimizing the ratio of solvent to feed. The distillations were performed at equilibrium to determine the relative volatility of ethylbenzene to p-xylene with the extractive solvents under isothermal condition. For a single extraction solvent, 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene_x000D_
had the highest relative volatility at 1.123. In some cases, combinations of two or three solvents were used as well as different ratios of solvent to feed to investigate the synergy effect of the mixture solvents. The binary solvent mixture of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and maleic anhydride (2 : 1) had the best performance with a relative volatility of 1.228 at the solvent/feed ratio of 1 : 1. Some of the solvents were further studied at different solvent/feed (S/F) ratios. Selected solvents generally tended to have higher relative volatilities at high S/F ratios, but the operation cost will increase. Therefore, it is important to find the proper conditions to optimize the S/F ratio for extractive distillation from the industrial point of view.
References
Monton JB, Llopis FJ, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 39(1), 50 (1994)
Seko M, Takeuchl H, Inada T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 21, 656 (1982)
Alaerts L, Kirschhock CEA, Maes M, van der Veen MA, Finsy V, Depla A, Martens JA, Baron GV, Jacobs PA, Denayer JFM, De Vos DE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 4293 (2007)
Gu ZY, Jiang DQ, Wang HF, Cui XY, Yan XY, J. Phys. Chem., 114, 311 (2010)
Jongmans MTG, Maassen JIW, Luijks AJ, Schuur B, de Haan AB, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 56(9), 3510 (2011)
Rodrigues WL, Mattedi S, Abreu JCN, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 22, 453 (2005)
Berg L, US Patent, 4,299,668 (1981)
Diaz C, Dominguez A, Tojo J, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 47(4), 867 (2002)
Rodrigues WL, Mattedi S, Abreu JCN, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 50(4), 1134 (2005)
Lek-utaiwan P, Suphanit B, Douglas PL, Mongkolsiri N, Comput. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1088 (2011)
Yin W, Ding SH, Xia SQ, Ma PS, Huang XJ, Zhu ZS, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(9), 3274 (2010)
Jongmans MTG, Schuur B, de Haan AB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(18), 10800 (2011)
Berg L, Kober PJ, AIChE J., 26, 862 (1980)
Berg L, AIChE J., 29, 694 (1983)
Berg L, Yeh AI, US Patent, 4,673,465 (1987)
Cassol CC, Umpierre AP, Ebeling G, Ferrera B, Chiaro SSX, Dupont J, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 8(7), 593 (2007)
Benjamin SU, Hsu CY, US Patent, 5,476,981 (1995)
Seko M, Takeuchl H, Inada T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 21, 656 (1982)
Alaerts L, Kirschhock CEA, Maes M, van der Veen MA, Finsy V, Depla A, Martens JA, Baron GV, Jacobs PA, Denayer JFM, De Vos DE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 4293 (2007)
Gu ZY, Jiang DQ, Wang HF, Cui XY, Yan XY, J. Phys. Chem., 114, 311 (2010)
Jongmans MTG, Maassen JIW, Luijks AJ, Schuur B, de Haan AB, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 56(9), 3510 (2011)
Rodrigues WL, Mattedi S, Abreu JCN, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 22, 453 (2005)
Berg L, US Patent, 4,299,668 (1981)
Diaz C, Dominguez A, Tojo J, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 47(4), 867 (2002)
Rodrigues WL, Mattedi S, Abreu JCN, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 50(4), 1134 (2005)
Lek-utaiwan P, Suphanit B, Douglas PL, Mongkolsiri N, Comput. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1088 (2011)
Yin W, Ding SH, Xia SQ, Ma PS, Huang XJ, Zhu ZS, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(9), 3274 (2010)
Jongmans MTG, Schuur B, de Haan AB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(18), 10800 (2011)
Berg L, Kober PJ, AIChE J., 26, 862 (1980)
Berg L, AIChE J., 29, 694 (1983)
Berg L, Yeh AI, US Patent, 4,673,465 (1987)
Cassol CC, Umpierre AP, Ebeling G, Ferrera B, Chiaro SSX, Dupont J, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 8(7), 593 (2007)
Benjamin SU, Hsu CY, US Patent, 5,476,981 (1995)
