Thermal regeneration of spent granular activated carbon (GAC) using sintering, air-activation, and deoxygenation was investigated to determine the potential of this method for overcoming the drawbacks of thermal regeneration. The conditions for each step were optimized. The physicochemical properties of four regenerated GACs were assessed using BET, SEM, and FT-IR analysis. The suitability of the regenerated GACs for liquid-phase applications was assessed by phenol adsorption, using adsorption isotherms, kinetics, and thermodynamics. Sintering increased the micropore area and volume of regenerated GAC by 19% and 16%, respectively, and controlled excessive burn-off, reducing it by 19%. Air-activation has economic advantages because the reaction time is 80% less than that for steamactivation. Deoxygenation improved the maximum adsorption capacity by 7%, although the number of micropores was reduced. Regenerated GAC by sintering, air-activation, and deoxygenation was best for liquid-phase applications; the results show that these steps help to overcome the drawbacks of thermal regeneration.

Thermal Regeneration Sintering Air-activation Deoxygenation Phenol Adsorption

Sabio E, Gonzalez E, Gonzalez JF, Gonzalez-Garcia CM, Ramiro A, Ganan J, Carbon, 42, 2285 (2004)
San Miguel G, Lambert SD, Graham NJD, Water Res., 35, 2740 (2001)
Cazetta AL, Junior OP, Vargas AMM, da Silva AP, Zou X, Asefa T, Almeida VC, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 101, 53 (2013)
Narbaitz RM, McEwen J, Water Res., 46, 4852 (2012)
Lai B, Zhou YX, Yang P, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 88(3), 474 (2013)
Roman S, Ledesma B, Alvarez-Murillo A, Gonzalez JF, Fuel Process. Technol., 116, 358 (2013)
Franz M, Arafat HA, Pinto NG, Carbon, 38, 1807 (2000)
Mazyck DW, Cannon FS, Carbon, 38, 1785 (2000)
Mazyck DW, Cannon FS, Carbon, 40, 241 (2002)
Cannon FS, Carbon, 32, 1285 (1994)
McLaughlin H, Int. Sugar J., 107, 112 (2005)
Ryoo KS, Kim TD, Kim YH, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 23, 817 (2002)
Roman S, Ledesma B, Alvarez-Murillo A, Gonzalez JF, Fuel Process. Technol., 116, 358 (2013)
Pendleton P, Wu SH, Badalyan A, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 246(2), 235 (2002)
KSM 1802, Test methods for activated carbon, Korea Industrial Standards, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (2009)
Zhang ZY, Qu WW, Peng JH, Zhang LB, Ma XY, Zhang ZB, Li W, Desalination, 249(1), 247 (2009)
Hameed BH, Rahman AA, J. Hazard. Mater., 160(2-3), 576 (2008)
Din ATM, Hameed BH, Ahmad AL, J. Hazard. Mater., 161(2-3), 1522 (2009)
Srivastava VC, Swamy MM, Mall ID, Prasad B, Mishra IM, Colloids Surf., A., 272, 89 (2006)
McCafferty ND, Callow ME, Hoggett L, Holden B, Leadbeater BSC, Water Res., 34, 2199 (2000)
Clifford D, Subramonian S, Sorg TJ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 1072 (1986)
Moulijn JA, van Diepen AE, Kapteijn F, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 212(1-2), 3 (2001)
Bartholomew CH, Appl. Catal. A-Gen., 212, 17 (2001)
Yang JH, Shih SM, Lin PH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(6), 2553 (2012)
San Miguel G, Lambert SD, Graham NJD, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 40(3), 185 (2003)
Yan R, Liang DT, Tsen L, Wong YP, Lee YL, Fuel, 83(17-18), 2401 (2004)
Savova D, Apak E, Ekinci E, Yardim F, Petrov N, Budinova T, Razvigorova M, Minkova V, Biomass Bioenerg., 21(2), 133 (2001)
Duan XH, Srinivasakannan C, Qu WW, Xin W, Peng JH, Zhang LB, Chem. Eng. Process., 53, 53 (2012)
Lai B, Zhang YH, Chen ZY, Yang P, Zhou YX, Wang JL, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 144, 816 (2014)
Lai B, Zhou YX, Yang P, Chem. Eng. J., 200, 10 (2012)
Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH, Org. Geochem., 37, 1477 (2006)
Yoon IH, Meng XG, Wang C, Kim KW, Bang S, Choe E, Lippincott L, J. Hazard. Mater., 164(1), 87 (2009)
Swiatkowski A, Pakula M, Biniak S, Walczyk M, Carbon, 42, 3057 (2004)
Azizian S, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 276(1), 47 (2004)
Dursun AY, Kalayci CS, J. Hazard. Mater., 123(1-3), 151 (2005)
Bilgili AS, J. Hazard. Mater., 137(1), 157 (2006)