We examined the feasible separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 through high pressure distillation as environmentally benign separation for structural material of nuclear power reactor. The bubble point pressures of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 mixtures were determined experimentally by using an invariable volume equilibrium cell at high pressure and temperature condition range of 2.3-5.6MPa and 440-490 ℃. The experimental bubble point pressure data were correlated with Peng-Robinson equation of state with a good agreement. Based on the vapor-liquid equilibrium properties evaluated from the experimental data, the feasibility of high pressure distillation process for the separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 was investigated with its main design condition through rigorous simulation using a commercial process simulator, ASPEN Hysys. An enhanced distillation configuration was also proposed to improve energy efficiency in the distillation process. The result showed that a heat-pump assisted distillation with a partial bottom flash could be a promising option for commercial separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 by taking into account of both energy and environmental advantages.

Zirconium Tetrachloride Hafnium Tetrachloride Nuclear Power Reactor Bubble Point Pressure Peng-Robinson Equation of State High Pressure Distillation Heat Pump

Franklink DG, Lang PM, Zirconium . Alloy Corrosion: A review based on an IAEA meeting, In Zirconium in Nuclear Industry, Ninth International Symposium, Philadelphia, 3 -32 (1991)
Sathiyamoorthy D, Shetty SM, Bose DK, Gupta CK, High Temp. Mater. Processes, 18, 213 (1999)
Annual Book of ASTM Standards: part 8, Nonferrous Metals-Nickel, Lead and Tin Alloys, Precious Metals, Primary Metals; Reactive Metals, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1976)
Moulin L, Thouvenin P, Brun P, Paper presented at the 6th international conference on zirconium in the nuclear industy, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (1982)
Branken DJ, M.S. Thesis, North-West University (2009)
Vinarov IV, Russ. Chem. Rev., 36, 522 (1967)
Tricot R, J. Nucl. Mater., 189, 277 (1992)
Moulin L, Thouvenin P, Brun P, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., 284, 37 (1984)
Lee ED, McLaughlin DF, US Patent, 4,913,778 (1990)
Nandi B, Das NR, Bhattacharyya SN, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 1, 141 (1983)
Delons L, Picard G, Tigreat D, US Patent, 6,929,786 B2 (2005)
Kroll WJ, Schleckten AW, Yerkes LA, Trans. Electrochem. Soc., 89, 263 (1946)
Denisova ND, Safronov EK, Pustil’nik AI, Bystrova ON, Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 41, 30 (1967)
Bromberg ML, US Patent, 2,852,446 (1958)
Ishikuza H, Eur. Patent, 45270 (1982)
Duarte ARC, Mooijer-van den Heuvel MM, Duarte CMM, Peters CJ, Fluid Phase Equilib., 214(2), 121 (2003)
Tangri RP, Bose DK, Gupta CK, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 40(4), 823 (1995)
Palko AA, Ryan AD, Kuhn DW, J. Phys. Chem., 62, 319 (1958)
Kim JD, Spink DR, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 19, 36 (1974)
Li H, Nersisyan HH, Park KT, Park SB, Kim JG, Lee JM, Lee JH, J. Nucl. Mater., 413, 107 (2011)
Chen CC, Mathias PM, AIChE J., 48(2), 194 (2002)
Elliot JR, Lira CT, Introductory chemical engineering thermodynamics, Prentice-Hall Inc., NJ (1999)
Kim JH, Kim MS, Fluid Phase Equilib., 238(1), 13 (2005)
Lee JM, Lee BC, Cho CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(5), 510 (2000)
Shi YH, Liu HL, Wang K, Xiao WD, Hu Y, Fluid Phase Equilib., 234(1-2), 1 (2005)
Peng DY, Robinson DB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 15, 59 (1976)
ANNAKOU O, MIZSEY P, Heat Recov. Syst. CHP, 15(3), 241 (1995)
Jana AK, Appl. Energy, 87(5), 1477 (2010)
Chew JM, Reddy CCS, Rangaiah GP, Chem. Eng. Process., 76, 45 (2014)
Long NVD, Lee M, Energy, 57, 663 (2013)
Kiss AA, Landaeta SJF, Ferreira CAI, Energy, 47(1), 531 (2012)