ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received April 15, 2016
Accepted October 12, 2016
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Comparison of electrostatic charge and beta attenuation mass monitors for continuous airborne PM10 monitoring under field conditions

Research Unit of Electrostatic Applications in Energy and Environment (RUEE), College of Integrated Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Chiang Mai 50220, Thailand 1Center of Excellent on Energy, Economic and Ecological Management (3E), Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, December 2016, 33(12), 3330-3336(7), 10.1007/s11814-016-0288-y
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

An electrostatic PM10 mass monitor (EPMM) used for wireless continuous airborne particulate matter monitoring was developed and evaluated in our previous work. However, differences in measured PM10 mass concentrations between the electrostatic charge and the beta ray attenuation methods due to the frequent occurrence of high humidity and temperature in the ambient air in Thailand’s have not been extensively studied in our previous work; and in the literature, it would be necessary to compare the output of the EPMM against the beta ray attenuation mass monitor. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the EPMM simultaneously with a commercially available FH62C14 Beta gauge continuous ambient particulate monitor, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., for PM10 measurements at ambient condition in the field. The measurements were made at Yupparaj Wittayalai School, Si Phum, Mueang, Chiang Mai, Thailand from November 16-23, 2015. They showed that the averages of PM10 mass concentrations measured by the EPMM linearly correlate very well with the PM10 mass concentrations measured by the FH62C14. The slopes were 0.9620 and 1.0649 for 1 and 24-hour, respectively, and R2 of 0.8634 and 0.9889 for 1 and 24-hour, respectively. Finally, this comparison proved to be particularly useful in the refinement and design of the EPMM.

References

EPA, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter,Final Rule, Federal Register, 62, 38651 (1997).
Dockery DW, III. Pope CA, Xu X, Spen-gler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG, Speizer FE, New Eng. J. Med., 329, 1753 (1993)
Federal Register, National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, 40 CFR Part 50.7, Section 8.2, Vol. 62, No. 138, July 18 (1997).
Babich P, Wang PY, Allen G, Sioutas C, Koutrakis P, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 32(4), 309 (2000)
Koch W, Dunkhorst W, Lodding H, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 31(2), 231 (1999)
Lippmann M, Xiong JQ, Li W, Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 15(1), 57 (2000)
Misra C, Geller MD, Shah P, Sioutas C, Solomon PA, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 51(9), 1309 (2001)
Patashnick H, Rupprecht EG, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 41(8), 1079 (1991)
Lee JH, Hopke PK, Holsen TM, Lee DW, Jaques PA, Sioutas C, Ambs JL, J. Aerosol Sci., 36(1), 95 (2005)
Intra P, Yawootti A, Tippayawong N, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(12), 2205 (2013)
TSI Incorporated, Instruction Manual for Electrical Aerosol Detector Model 3070A, Minnesota, U.S.A. (2002).
Khedo KK, Perseedoss R, Mungur A, Int. J. Wireless and Mobile Networks, 2(2), 31 (2010)
Park D, Kwon SB, Cho Y, Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal., 1(1), 15 (2013)
Yawootti A, Intra P, Tippayawong N, Sampattagul S, J. Electrost., 78(1), 46 (2015)
Intra P, Yawootti A, Vinitketkumnuen U, Tippayawong N, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(8), 1044 (2012)
Intra P, Tippayawong N, J. Elec. Eng. Tech., 8(5), 1175 (2013)
Hinds WC, Aerosol Technology, Wiley, New York, U.S.A. (1999).
Intra P, Tippayawong N, Particul. Sci. Technol., 33(33), 57 (2015)
Thermo Scientific Inc., Instruction Manual for Thermo Scientific Model FH62C14 Beta Gauge Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitor, U.S.A. (2014).
Ayers GP, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2423 (2001)
US EPA, Revisions to the national ambient air quality standards for particulate matter, 40 CFR Part 50, Federal Register, 52: 24634, July 1 (1987).
Liu CN, Awasthi A, Hung YH, Gugamsetty B, Tsai CJ, Wu YC, Chen CF, Atmos. Environ., 75, 341 (2013)
Speer RE, Barnes HM, Brown R, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 27, 50 (1997)
Young PM, Sung A, Traini D, Kwok P, Chiou H, Chan HK, Pharmaceut. Res., 24(5), 963 (2007)
Liu CN, Lin SF, Tsai CJ, Wu YC, Chen CF, Atmos. Environ., 109, 79 (2015)
Liu CN, Lin SF, Tsai CJ, Wu YC, Chen CF, Atmos. Environ., 85, 48 (2014)
Yawootti A, Intra P, Tippayawong N, Rattanadecho P, J. Electrost., 77, 116 (2015)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로