Based on ultrasonic sound pressure attenuation, the ultrasonic pulse transmission method is proposed for measuring gas holdup in gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flows. Two ultrasonic transducers are positioned on opposite sides of a vertical upward pipe with an inner diameter of 20 mm. To obtain the relationship between ultrasonic attenuation and gas holdup, the mean value of the first pulse sequence of ultrasonic signals is first extracted as the measured signal. We used the quick closing valve method to obtain the gas holdup as the set value. Second, the relationship between the gas holdup and measured ultrasonic signals was established. The experiment result shows that the ultrasonic attenuation rate is significantly different at low and high gas holdups, as indicated by the bubble size images with a high-speed camera. We also investigated the ultrasonic field distribution using numerical simulation. The bubble size has an important effect on the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient, which provides a further physical explanation and reference for the experimental phenomena.

Gas-liquid Two-phase Bubbly Flow Gas Holdup Ultrasonic Measurement Method High-speed Camera Sound Field Simulation

Lee J, Yasin M, Park S, Chang IS, Ha KS, Lee EY, Lee J, Kim C, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(6), 1060 (2015)
Rodriguez OMH, Oliemans RVA, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 32, 324 (2006)
Takeda Y, Ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiler for fluid flow, Springer, Berlin (2012).
Xu LJ, Xu LA, Flow Meas. Instrum., 8, 150 (1998)
Cong JS, Wang XM, Chen DH, Xu DL, Che CX, Ma SL, Chinese J. Geophys., 51, 193 (2008)
Rahiman MHF, Zakaria Z, Rahim RA, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering, Kuala Lumpur (2008).
Xu LA, Leonard D, Green RG, J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 18, 612 (1985)
Soong Y, Gamwo IK, Blackwell AG, Harke FW, Schehl RR, Zarochak MF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35, 1811 (1996)
Stolojanu V, Prakash A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52, 4228 (1997)
Rahiman MHF, Rahim RA, Rahim RA, Ayob NMN, Mohamad EJ, Zakaria Z, Sens. Actuators B-Chem., 184, 103 (2013)
Supardan MD, Masuda Y, Maezawa A, Uchida S, Chem. Eng. J., 130, 129 (2007)
Murakawa H, Kikura H, Aritomi M, Flow Meas. Instrum., 19, 3 (2008)
Carvalho RDM, Venturini OJ, Tanahashi EI, Neves F, Franca FA, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 33, 1077 (2009)
Ito D, Kikura H, Aritomi M, Mori M, J. Phys. Conference Series, 147, 1 (2009)
Chakraborty S, Keller E, Talley J, Srivastav A, Ray A, Kim S, Meas. Sci. Technol., 20, 28 (2009)
Schmerr LW, Song SJ, Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems: models and measurements, Springer, Berlin (2007).
Stravs AA, Von Stockar U, Chem. Eng. Sci., 40, 1172 (1985)
Bensler HP, Delhaye JM, Favreau C, Proceedings of the ANS National Heat Transfer Conference (1987).
Warsito, Ohkawa M, Kawata N, Uchida S, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54, 4719 (1999)
Hendee WR, Ritenour ER, Medical imaging physics, Wiley, New York (2002).
Tapp HS, Peyton AJ, Kemsley EK, Wilson RH, Sens. Actuators B-Chem., 92, 22 (2003)
Xu LJ, Xu LA, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (1997).
Rahiman MHF, Rahim HA, Ayob NMN, Rahim RA, Design and development of ultrasonic process tomography, InTech Open Access Publisher (2012).
Li DM, Zhai LS, Jin ND, Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Hefei, China (2012).
Zhai LS, Jin ND, Gao ZK, Wang ZY, Li DM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 94, 277 (2013)
Berenger JP, J. Comput. Phys., 114, 193 (1994)
Niwa N, Choonpa Keisoku, Shokodo Press, Tokyo (1982).
Zun I, Nucl. Eng. Des., 118, 157 (1990)