A disc-type Pd-Au membrane module was considered, and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to describe the actual flow dynamics and the distribution of H2 flux over the membrane. When the membrane size was increased to develop a module with a large separation capacity, the feed flow rate per unit membrane area decreased, indicating loss of utilization of the membrane area. To increase the utilization, the sizes of the feed inlet tube and retentate tube were varied (cases 1 and 2, respectively). The CFD simulation showed that the feed flow rates per unit membrane area increased by ca. 8% and 10%, respectively, whereas a change in the geometry from circular to a rectangle with rounded edges (case 3) resulted in an increase of approximately 19%. A change in the ratio of the edges (case 4) had a slight influence on the separation performance. The distribution of H2 flux where the geometries in cases 1-3 were combined clearly revealed that most of the membrane area was used to permeate H2; as a result, the number of membranes decreased by approximately 88% upon increasing their size, while the total membrane area remained the same. This indicated improved utilization of the membrane. The proposed approach is expected to be useful for acquiring valuable information on the design of a membrane module with a large separation capacity.

Disc-type Membrane Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Membrane Geometry Hydrogen Flux Scale-up

Steeneveldt R, Berger B, Torp TA, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 84(A9), 739 (2006)
Scholes CA, Smith KH, Kentish SE, Stevens GW, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 739 (2010)
Mansourizadeh A, Ismail AF, J. Hazard. Mater., 171(1-3), 38 (2009)
Dai ZD, Ansaloni L, Deng LY, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55(20), 5983 (2016)
Ahmad NA, Leo CP, Ahmad AL, Mohammad AW, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(8), 4855 (2016)
Brunetti A, Scura F, Barbieri G, Drioli E, J. Membr. Sci., 359(1-2), 115 (2010)
Kenarsari SD, Yang D, Jiang G, Zhang S, Wang J, Russel AGl Wei Q, Fan M, RSC Adv., 3, 22739 (2013)
Bernardo P, Drioli E, Golemme G, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(10), 4638 (2009)
Ward TL, Dao T, J. Membr. Sci., 153(2), 211 (1999)
Gielens FC, Knibbeler RJJ, Duysinx PFJ, Tong HD, Vorstman MAG, Keurentjes JTF, J. Membr. Sci., 279(1-2), 176 (2006)
Liu LY, Li LJ, Ding ZW, Ma RY, Yang ZR, J. Membr. Sci., 264(1-2), 113 (2005)
Jaffrin MY, J. Membr. Sci., 324(1-2), 7 (2008)
Hwang KR, Lee CB, Ryi SK, Park JS, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37(8), 6626 (2012)
Hwang KR, Lee SW, Ryi SK, Kim DK, Kim TH, Park JS, Fuel Process. Technol., 106, 133 (2013)
Boon J, Pieterse JAZ, van Berkel FPF, van Delft YC, Annaland MV, J. Membr. Sci., 496, 344 (2015)
Chen WH, Syu WZ, Hung CI, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(22), 14734 (2011)
Takaba H, Nakao S, J. Membr. Sci., 249(1-2), 83 (2005)
Grahn M, Hedlund J, J. Membr. Sci., 471, 328 (2014)
Ramirez-Santos AA, Castel C, Favre E, J. Membr. Sci., 526, 191 (2017)
Shafiee A, Arab M, Lai ZP, Liu ZW, Abbas A, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(42), 19081 (2016)
Spallina V, Pandolfo D, Battistella A, Romano MC, Annaland MV, Gallucci F, Energy Conv. Manag., 120, 257 (2016)
Boon J, Pieterse JAZ, Dijkstra JW, Van Delft YC, Veenstra P, Nijmeijer P, Jansen D, Energy Procedia, 37, 1020 (2013)
Xie F, Liu J, Wang J, Chen W, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(7), 2169 (2016)
Shin DY, Hwang KR, Park JS, Park MJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(7), 1414 (2015)
Ryi SK, Park JS, Hwang KR, Lee CB, Lee SW, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(21), 13769 (2011)
Choi JH, Park MJ, Kim JN, Ko Y, Lee SH, Baek I, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(6), 1187 (2013)
Brenner SC, Scott LR, The mathematical theory of finite element methods, 2nd Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York (2002).
Ryi SK, Park JS, Hwang KR, Lee CB, Lee SW, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 38(18), 7605 (2013)
Guazzone F, Engwall EE, Ma YH, Catal. Today, 118(1-2), 24 (2006)
Liang WQ, Hughes R, Chem. Eng. J., 112(1-3), 81 (2005)
Hwang KR, Lee SW, Oh DK, Lee CB, Park JS, J. Alloy. Compd., 685, 337 (2016)
Hwang KR, Lee CB, Ryi SK, Park JS, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37(8), 6626 (2012)