Catalytic reactors have been essential for chemical engineering process, and different designs of reactors in multi-scales have been previously studied. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) utilized in reactor designs have been gaining interest due to its cost-effective advantage in designing the actual reactors before its construction. In this work, butadiene synthesis via oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of n-butene using tubular reactor was used as a case study in the CFD model. The effects of coolant and reactor diameter were investigated in assessing the reactor performance. Based on the results of the CFD model, the conversion and selectivity were 86.5% and 59.5% respectively in a fixed bed reactor under adiabatic condition. When coolants were used in a tubular reactor, reactor temperature profiles showed that solar salt had lower temperature gradients inside the reactor than the cooling water. Furthermore, higher conversion (90.9%) and selectivity (90.5%) were observed for solar salt as compared to the cooling water (88.4% for conversion and 86.3% for selectivity). Meanwhile, reducing the reactor diameter resulted in smaller temperature gradients with higher conversion and selectivity.

Catalysis Computer Modelling Heat Transfer Kinetics Reactor Design

Park JH, Shin CH, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 683 (2015)
Park JH, Noh H, Park JW, Row KH, Jung KD, Shin CH, Res. Chem. Intermed., 37, 1125 (2011)
Rischard J, Franz R, Antinori C, Deutschmann O, AIChE J., 63(1), 43 (2017)
Lee H, Jung JC, Kim H, Chung YM, Kim TJ, Lee SJ, Oh SH, Kim YS, Song IK, Catal. Commun., 9, 1137 (2008)
Hong E, Park JH, Shin CH, Catal. Surv. Asia, 20, 23 (2016)
Huang K, Wang L, Lin S, Xu Y, Wu D, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 63, 61 (2016)
Park JH, Shin CH, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 495, 1 (2015)
Yan W, Kouk QY, Luo J, Liu Y, Borgna A, Catal. Commun., 46, 208 (2014)
Zhang JH, Wang ZB, Zhao H, Tian YY, Shan HH, Yang CH, Appl. Petrochem. Res., 5, 255 (2015)
Park S, Lee Y, Kim G, Hwang S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(12), 3417 (2016)
Ren T, Patel MK, Blok K, Energy, 33(5), 817 (2008)
Sterrett JS, McIlvried HG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 13, 54 (1974)
Makshina EV, Dusselier M, Janssens W, Degreve J, Jacobs PA, Sels BF, Chem. Soc. Rev., 43, 7917 (2014)
Wu XG, Liu HQ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(8), 2570 (1996)
Dumez FJ, Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 15, 291 (1976)
Trimm DL, Gabbay DS, Trans. Faraday Soc., 67, 2782 (1971)
Park JH, Shin CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(3), 823 (2016)
Heidari A, Hashemabadi SH, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 1389 (2014)
Hukkanen EJ, Rangitsch MJ, Witt PM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(44), 15437 (2013)
Asadi-Saghandi H, Karimi-Sabet J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(7), 1905 (2017)
Singh RI, Brink A, Hupa M, Appl. Therm. Eng., 52, 585 (2013)
Tian L, Hu GH, Du WL, Qian F, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 94(12), 2427 (2016)
Huang K, Lin S, Wang J, Luo Z, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 29, 172 (2015)
Cornelissen JT, Taghipour F, Escudie R, Ellis N, Grace JR, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(22), 6334 (2007)
Liu XH, Hu SW, Jiang YF, Li JH, Chem. Eng. J., 278, 492 (2015)
Bakshi A, Altantzis C, Glicksman LR, Ghoniem AF, Powder Technol., 316, 500 (2017)
Wgialla KM, Helal AM, Elnashaie SSEH, Math. Comput. Model., 15, 17 (1991)
Zhai Z, Wang X, Licht R, Bell AT, J. Catal., 325, 87 (2015)
Rothenberg RI, Smith JM, AIChE J., 12, 213 (1966)
Serrano-Lopez R, Fradera J, Cuesta-Lopez S, Chem. Eng. Process., 73, 87 (2013)