We evaluated the effect of particle size and associated dynamics on a hydrocyclone separation process in order to understand the movement of the particle trajectories inside the hydrocyclone via numerical analysis, with particles of acid hydrolysis residues discharged in TiO2 production via the sulfate method as a case study. The values obtained from the numerical simulation were successfully compared with those from experimental tests in the literature, allowing a description of the dynamics of the particles, their acting forces, and their relevant properties together with separation efficiency. The results showed that particle motion is jointly controlled by the drag force, the pressure gradient force and the centrifugal force. With increasing particle size, the influence of the drag force is weakened, whereas that of the centrifugal force and pressure gradient is strengthened. Factors including particle density, slurry viscosity, and inlet slurry flow rate also contribute to a clear and useful understanding of particle motion behavior in the hydrocyclone as a method for improving the separation efficiency.

Hydrocyclone Separation Characteristic Particle Motion Computational Fluid Dynamic

Belardi G, Piga L, Quaresima S, Shehu N, Int. J. Miner. Process., 53(3), 145 (1998)
Svarovsky L, Hydrocyclones[M], Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London (1984).
Plitt LR, CIM Bull., 69, 114 (1976)
Wang B, Yu AB, AIChE J., 56(7), 1703 (2010)
Wang B, Yu AB, Miner. Eng., 19(10), 1022 (2006)
Yoshida H, Takashina T, Fukui K, Iwanaga T, Powder Technol., 140(1-2), 1 (2004)
Noroozi S, Hashemabadi SH, Chem. Eng. Technol., 32(12), 1885 (2009)
Vieira LGM, Silva DO, Barrozo MAS, Chem. Eng. Technol., 39(8), 1406 (2016)
Tang B, Xu Y, Song X, Sun Z, Yu J, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 27, 1645 (2017)
Vieira LGM, Barrozo MAS, Miner. Eng., 57, 50 (2014)
Tang B, Xu YX, Song XF, Sun Z, Yu JG, Chem. Eng. J., 278, 504 (2015)
Mokni I, Dhaouad H, Bournot P, Mhiri H, Chem. Eng. Sci., 122, 500 (2015)
Kilavuz FS, Gulsoy OY, Int. J. Miner. Process., 98(3-4), 163 (2011)
Silva NKG, Silva DO, Vieira LGM, Barrozo MAS, Powder Technol., 286, 305 (2015)
Ghodrat M, Kuang SB, Yu AB, Vince A, Barnett GD, Barnett PJ, Miner. Eng., 62, 74 (2014)
Wang B, Yu AB, Chem. Eng. J., 135(1-2), 33 (2008)
Vieira LGM, Damasceno JJR, Barrozo MAS, Chem. Eng. Process., 49(5), 460 (2010)
Chu LY, Chen WM, Lee XZ, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(1), 207 (2002)
Bai Z, Wang H, Tu S, Petrol. Sci. Technol., 28, 575 (2010)
Hwang K, Wu W, Qian S, Nagase Y, Sep. Sci. Technol., 15, 3777 (2008)
Hwang KJ, Hwang YW, Yoshida H, Shigemori K, Powder Technol., 232, 41 (2012)
Zhao LX, Jiang MH, Xu BR, Zhu BJ, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 90(12), 2129 (2012)
Fu P, Wang F, Yang X, Ma L, Cui X, Wang H, Sci. Technol., 51, 1587 (2017)
Liu PK, Chu LY, Wang J, Yul YF, Chem. Eng. Technol., 31(3), 474 (2008)
Cui R, Wang G, Li M, Trans. Noferrous Met. Soc. China, 25, 2422 (2015)
Cui B, Wei D, Gao S, Liu W, Feng Y, Trans. Noferrous Met. Soc. China, 24, 2642 (2014)
Wang ZB, Chu LY, Chen WM, Wang SG, Chem. Eng. J., 138(1-3), 1 (2008)
Chang YF, Ilea CG, Aasen OL, Hoffmann AC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(18), 4203 (2011)
Nageswararao K, Chem. Eng. J., 80(1-3), 251 (2000)
Patil DD, Rao TC, Miner. Metall. Process., 18, 4 (2001)
Hwang K, Hsueh W, Nagase Y, Dry Technol., 26, 1002 (2008)
Kozołub P, Klimanek A, Białecki RA, Adamczyk WP, Particuology, 31, 170 (2016)
Adamczyk WP, Myohanen K, Hartge EU, Ritvanen J, Klimanek A, Hyppanen T, Bialecki RA, Energy, 143, 219 (2018)
Xu YX, Song XF, Sun Z, Tang B, Li P, Yu JG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(15), 5470 (2013)
Morsi SA, Alexander AJ, J. Fluid Mech., 55, 193 (1972)
Hsieh KT, Phenomenological Model of the Hydrocyclone[D]. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, U.S.A.(1988).