Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received May 8, 2018
Accepted October 12, 2019
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Flow characteristics within the wall boundary layers of swirling steam flow in a pipe comprising horizontal and inclined sections
Afrasyab Khan†
Mohd Sobri Takriff
Masli Irwan Rosli
Nur Tantiyani Ali Othman
Khairuddin Sanaullah1
Andrew Ragai Henry Rigit1
Ajmal Shah2
Atta Ullah3
Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia 1Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia 2Center of Mathematical Sciences (CMS), Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilor, Islamabad, Pakistan 3Department of Chemical Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilor, Islamabad, Pakistan
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, January 2020, 37(1), 19-36(18), 10.1007/s11814-019-0404-x
Download PDF
Abstract
Handling and utilization of steam flow efficiently to obtain various tangible industrial outcomes relies mainly upon how to optimize various flow parameters like boundary layer thickness, skewness, shear stress, and turbulent dissipation for minimum losses such as pressure and heat. Swirling steam flow, driven by a propeller through a circular duct along horizontal and inclined surfaces presents an interesting flow regime that includes the boundary layer flows close to the wall of the pipe and weak and uniform flow that prevails across the inner region of the pipe. Such flow was investigated here with a specially designed experimental facility. Convective Instabilities were observed that propagate along the axial direction in a nonlinear fashion. It was observed that the operating conditions could be optimized for measuring the shear stresses based on the intersection of the profiles under the effect of variations in the inlet pressure of steam and the rotational speed of the propeller. We found that the flow transformed from positive to negative skewness when the rotational speed of the propeller was raised from 4-14 thousand per minute at 10 bars of constant inlet steam pressure. More area came under the effect of reduced skin friction when the rotational speed of the propeller was raised. More turbulent energy was found to be dissipated when the rotational speed of the propeller was raised. It was found that yet the dissipation of the turbulent energy takes place under the joint effect of inlet pressure of steam and the rotational speed of the propeller, but the exact effect of any one of these two operating parameters still needs to be determined and requires further investigation.
References
Wallace EB, US5407305A: Continuous dense phase conveying method utilizing high pressure gas at predetermined gas pressures within a conveying pipe (1993).
Wallace EB, Continuous dense phase conveying method utilizing high pressure gas at predetermined gas pressures within a conveying pipe (1993).
Caro CG, Watkins NV, Birch PL, Yacoub M, WO2004083706A1 - Tubing and piping for multiphase flow - Google Patents, 2004.
Kato F, Onoda T, Takano T, Japanese Patent, JPH (1998).
Meroney RN, Measurements of Turbulent Boundary Layer Growth over a Longitudinally Curved Surface (1974).
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 20, 094103 (2008)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 21, 084106 (2009)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, J. Vis., 12, 195 (2009)
Mitsudharmadi H, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 17, 124102 (2005)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 25, 104104 (2013)
Mukund R, Viswanath PR, Narasimha R, Prabhu A, Crouch JD, J. Fluid Mech., 566, 97 (2006)
Tichenor NR, Humble RA, Bowersox RDW, J. Fluid Mech., 722, 187 (2013)
Swearingen JD, Blackwelder RF, J. Fluid Mech., 182, 255 (1987)
Bradshaw P, Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow, No. AGARD-AG-169. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Paris (France) (1973).
Bradshaw P, J. Fluid Mech., 63, 449 (1974)
Yang L, Zare-Behtash H, Erdem E, Kontis K, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 40, 50 (2012)
Jayaram M, Taylor MW, Smits AJ, J. Fluid Mech., 175, 343 (1987)
Flaherty W, Austin JM, Phys. Fluids, 25, 106106 (2013)
Donovan JF, Spina EF, Smits AJ, J. Fluid Mech., 259, 1 (1994)
Smith DR, Smits AJ, Exp. Fluids, 18, 363 (1995)
Franko KJ. Lele S, Phys. Fluids, 26, 024106 (2014)
Lee JH, Sung HJ, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29, 568 (2008)
Harun Z, Monty JP, Mathis R, Marusic I, J. Fluid Mech., 715, 477 (2013)
Shu S, Yang N, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 26, 31 (2018)
Shu SL, Yang N, Chem. Eng. Sci., 181, 132 (2018)
Pradhan A, Yadav S, Procedia Eng., 127, 177 (2015)
Sajjadi H, Salmanzadeh M, Ahmadi G, Jafari S, Comput. Fluids, 150, 66 (2017)
Sajjadi H, Salmanzadeh M, Ahmadi G, Jafari S, Particuology, 30, 62 (2017)
Fakhari A, Lee T, Comput. Fluids, 107, 205 (2015)
LM35 LM35 Precision Centigrade Temperature Sensors, 1999. www.ti.com.
CORPORATION MS, Pressure Sensor: PCB Model 113B27, PCB Piezotronics (2019).
Subsea Technology and Equipments - Oil&Gas Portal, www.Oil-Gasportal.Com. (n.d.).
King MK, Rothfus RR, Kermode RI, AIChE J., 15, 837 (1969)
Stanton TE, Marshall D, Bryant CN, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 97, 413 (1920)
Dzunic J, Petkovic MS, Petkovic LD, Appl. Math. Comput., 217, 7612 (2011)
Petkovic MS, Neta B, Petkovic LD, Dzunic J, Appl. Math. Comput., 226, 635 (2014)
Sharma JR, Arora H, Appl. Math. Comput., 273, 924 (2016)
Swanee PK, Jain AK, J. Hydraul. Div., 102(5), 657 (1976)
Lester TG, ASHRAE J., 44, 41 (2002)
Zhang X, Sun X, Xin X, Adv. Water Resour. Hydraul. Eng., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2163 (2009).
Baker DW, Proceeding Symp. Flow-Its Meas. Control Sci. Ind., 301 (1974).
Senoo Y, Nagata T, Bull. JSME, 15, 1514 (1972)
Benson T, Dynamic Pressure of a Moving Fluid Element, pp. 1, NASA (2014).
Gibson CH, Stegen GR, Williams RB, J. Fluid Mech., 41, 153 (1970)
Wyngaard JC, J. Fluid Mech., 48, 763 (1971)
Antonia RA, Van Atta CW, J. Fluid Mech., 67, 273 (1975)
Mestayer PG, Gibson CH, Coantic MF, Patel AS, Phys. Fluids, 19, 1276 (1976)
Sreenivasan KR, Antonia RA, Phys. Fluids, 20, 1986 (1977)
So RMC, Mellor GL, An experimental investigation of turbulent boundary layers along curved surfaces, NASA (1972).
Ramaprian BR, Shivaprasad BG, J. Fluid Mech., 85, 273 (1978)
Smits AJ, Eaton JA, Bradshaw P, J. Fluid Mech., 94, 243 (1979)
Winoto SH, Mitsudharmadi H, Shah DA, J. Vis., 8, 315 (2005)
Meroney RN, Bradshaw P, AIAA J., 13, 1448 (1975)
Zarbi G, Reynolds AJ, Fluid Dyn. Res., 7, 151 (1991)
Kolmogorov A, The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers, Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR (1941).
Kida S, Orszag SA, J. Sci. Comput., 5, 85 (1990)
Wallace EB, Continuous dense phase conveying method utilizing high pressure gas at predetermined gas pressures within a conveying pipe (1993).
Caro CG, Watkins NV, Birch PL, Yacoub M, WO2004083706A1 - Tubing and piping for multiphase flow - Google Patents, 2004.
Kato F, Onoda T, Takano T, Japanese Patent, JPH (1998).
Meroney RN, Measurements of Turbulent Boundary Layer Growth over a Longitudinally Curved Surface (1974).
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 20, 094103 (2008)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 21, 084106 (2009)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, J. Vis., 12, 195 (2009)
Mitsudharmadi H, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 17, 124102 (2005)
Tandiono T, Winoto SH, Shah DA, Phys. Fluids, 25, 104104 (2013)
Mukund R, Viswanath PR, Narasimha R, Prabhu A, Crouch JD, J. Fluid Mech., 566, 97 (2006)
Tichenor NR, Humble RA, Bowersox RDW, J. Fluid Mech., 722, 187 (2013)
Swearingen JD, Blackwelder RF, J. Fluid Mech., 182, 255 (1987)
Bradshaw P, Effects of streamline curvature on turbulent flow, No. AGARD-AG-169. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development Paris (France) (1973).
Bradshaw P, J. Fluid Mech., 63, 449 (1974)
Yang L, Zare-Behtash H, Erdem E, Kontis K, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 40, 50 (2012)
Jayaram M, Taylor MW, Smits AJ, J. Fluid Mech., 175, 343 (1987)
Flaherty W, Austin JM, Phys. Fluids, 25, 106106 (2013)
Donovan JF, Spina EF, Smits AJ, J. Fluid Mech., 259, 1 (1994)
Smith DR, Smits AJ, Exp. Fluids, 18, 363 (1995)
Franko KJ. Lele S, Phys. Fluids, 26, 024106 (2014)
Lee JH, Sung HJ, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29, 568 (2008)
Harun Z, Monty JP, Mathis R, Marusic I, J. Fluid Mech., 715, 477 (2013)
Shu S, Yang N, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 26, 31 (2018)
Shu SL, Yang N, Chem. Eng. Sci., 181, 132 (2018)
Pradhan A, Yadav S, Procedia Eng., 127, 177 (2015)
Sajjadi H, Salmanzadeh M, Ahmadi G, Jafari S, Comput. Fluids, 150, 66 (2017)
Sajjadi H, Salmanzadeh M, Ahmadi G, Jafari S, Particuology, 30, 62 (2017)
Fakhari A, Lee T, Comput. Fluids, 107, 205 (2015)
LM35 LM35 Precision Centigrade Temperature Sensors, 1999. www.ti.com.
CORPORATION MS, Pressure Sensor: PCB Model 113B27, PCB Piezotronics (2019).
Subsea Technology and Equipments - Oil&Gas Portal, www.Oil-Gasportal.Com. (n.d.).
King MK, Rothfus RR, Kermode RI, AIChE J., 15, 837 (1969)
Stanton TE, Marshall D, Bryant CN, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 97, 413 (1920)
Dzunic J, Petkovic MS, Petkovic LD, Appl. Math. Comput., 217, 7612 (2011)
Petkovic MS, Neta B, Petkovic LD, Dzunic J, Appl. Math. Comput., 226, 635 (2014)
Sharma JR, Arora H, Appl. Math. Comput., 273, 924 (2016)
Swanee PK, Jain AK, J. Hydraul. Div., 102(5), 657 (1976)
Lester TG, ASHRAE J., 44, 41 (2002)
Zhang X, Sun X, Xin X, Adv. Water Resour. Hydraul. Eng., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2163 (2009).
Baker DW, Proceeding Symp. Flow-Its Meas. Control Sci. Ind., 301 (1974).
Senoo Y, Nagata T, Bull. JSME, 15, 1514 (1972)
Benson T, Dynamic Pressure of a Moving Fluid Element, pp. 1, NASA (2014).
Gibson CH, Stegen GR, Williams RB, J. Fluid Mech., 41, 153 (1970)
Wyngaard JC, J. Fluid Mech., 48, 763 (1971)
Antonia RA, Van Atta CW, J. Fluid Mech., 67, 273 (1975)
Mestayer PG, Gibson CH, Coantic MF, Patel AS, Phys. Fluids, 19, 1276 (1976)
Sreenivasan KR, Antonia RA, Phys. Fluids, 20, 1986 (1977)
So RMC, Mellor GL, An experimental investigation of turbulent boundary layers along curved surfaces, NASA (1972).
Ramaprian BR, Shivaprasad BG, J. Fluid Mech., 85, 273 (1978)
Smits AJ, Eaton JA, Bradshaw P, J. Fluid Mech., 94, 243 (1979)
Winoto SH, Mitsudharmadi H, Shah DA, J. Vis., 8, 315 (2005)
Meroney RN, Bradshaw P, AIAA J., 13, 1448 (1975)
Zarbi G, Reynolds AJ, Fluid Dyn. Res., 7, 151 (1991)
Kolmogorov A, The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers, Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR (1941).
Kida S, Orszag SA, J. Sci. Comput., 5, 85 (1990)
