Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received September 22, 2019
Accepted December 1, 2019
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Si3N4 etch rates at various ion-incidence angles in high-density CF4, CHF3, and C2F6 plasmas
Institute of NT-IT Fusion Technology, Ajou University, 206 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea 1Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, 206 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea
changkoo@ajou.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, February 2020, 37(2), 374-379(6), 10.1007/s11814-019-0449-x
Download PDF
Abstract
The behavior of Si3N4 etching with ion-incidence angle in high-density CF4, CHF3, and C2F6 plasmas was investigated to understand the effect of discharge chemistry on the etch characteristics of Si3N4. The normalized etch yield (NEY) plots suggest that for all plasmas considered herein, physical sputtering is more prevalent than ion-assisted chemical etching as the Si3N4 etching mechanism. In the cases of the CF4 and C2F6 plasmas, the NEYs at an ion-incidence angle of 60° were greater than unity because the thickness and the fluorine-to-carbon (F/C) ratio of the steadystate fluorocarbon films (st-st FC films) on the Si3N4 surfaces decreased and increased, respectively, as the ion-incidence angle was increased from 0° to 60°. In contrast, the NEY at this angle in the CHF3 plasma was close to unity, as a result of a small change (or a very marginal decrease) in the thickness and the F/C ratio of the st-st FC film. Additionally, the NEY at an ion-incidence angle of 60° was higher in C2F6 plasma compared to CF4 plasma because the changes in the thickness and the F/C ratio of the st-st FC film were greater in the C2F6 plasma than those in the CF4 plasma.
References
Li YX, French PJ, Wolffenbuttel RF, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 13(5), 2008 (1995)
Choi JH, Kim SJ, Kim HT, Cho SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1348 (2018)
Kastenmeier BEE, Matsuo PJ, Oehrlein GS, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(6), 3179 (1999)
Schaepkens M, Oehrlein GS, Hedlund C, Jonsson LB, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 16(6), 3281 (1998)
Ito M, Kamiya K, Hori M, Goto T, J. Appl. Phys., 91, 3452 (2002)
Schaepkens M, Standaert TEFM, Rueger NR, Sebel PGM, Oehrlein GS, Cook JM, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(1), 26 (1999)
Barklund AM, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 10, 1212 (1992)
Barklund AM, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 11, 1226 (1993)
Cho SW, Kim CK, Lee JK, Moon SH, Chae H, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 30, 051301 (2012)
Cho SW, Kim JH, Kang DW, Lee K, Kim CK, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol., 3, Q215 (2014)
Cho SW, Kim JH, Bak JG, Kim CK, ECS Solid State Lett., 4, 85 (2015)
Kim JH, Cho SW, Park CJ, Chae H, Kim CK, Thin Solid Films, 637, 43 (2017)
Kim JH, Cho SW, Kim CK, Chem. Eng. Technol., 40(12), 2251 (2017)
Kim JH, Park JS, Kim CK, Thin Solid Films, 669, 262 (2019)
Standaert TEFM, Hedlund C, Joseph EA, Oehrlein GS, Dalton TJ, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 22(1), 53 (2004)
Cho BO, Hwang SW, Lee GR, Moon SH, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 18(6), 2791 (2000)
Hamblen DP, Cha-Lin A, J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, 1816 (1988)
Rueger NR, Beulens JJ, Schaepkens M, Doemling MF, Mirza JM, Standaert TE, Oehrlein GS, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 15(4), 1881 (1997)
Schaepkens M, Standaert TEFM, Rueger NR, Sebel PGM, Oehrlein GS, Cook JM, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(1), 26 (1999)
Choi JH, Kim SJ, Kim HT, Cho SM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1348 (2018)
Kastenmeier BEE, Matsuo PJ, Oehrlein GS, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(6), 3179 (1999)
Schaepkens M, Oehrlein GS, Hedlund C, Jonsson LB, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 16(6), 3281 (1998)
Ito M, Kamiya K, Hori M, Goto T, J. Appl. Phys., 91, 3452 (2002)
Schaepkens M, Standaert TEFM, Rueger NR, Sebel PGM, Oehrlein GS, Cook JM, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(1), 26 (1999)
Barklund AM, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 10, 1212 (1992)
Barklund AM, Blom HO, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 11, 1226 (1993)
Cho SW, Kim CK, Lee JK, Moon SH, Chae H, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 30, 051301 (2012)
Cho SW, Kim JH, Kang DW, Lee K, Kim CK, ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol., 3, Q215 (2014)
Cho SW, Kim JH, Bak JG, Kim CK, ECS Solid State Lett., 4, 85 (2015)
Kim JH, Cho SW, Park CJ, Chae H, Kim CK, Thin Solid Films, 637, 43 (2017)
Kim JH, Cho SW, Kim CK, Chem. Eng. Technol., 40(12), 2251 (2017)
Kim JH, Park JS, Kim CK, Thin Solid Films, 669, 262 (2019)
Standaert TEFM, Hedlund C, Joseph EA, Oehrlein GS, Dalton TJ, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 22(1), 53 (2004)
Cho BO, Hwang SW, Lee GR, Moon SH, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 18(6), 2791 (2000)
Hamblen DP, Cha-Lin A, J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, 1816 (1988)
Rueger NR, Beulens JJ, Schaepkens M, Doemling MF, Mirza JM, Standaert TE, Oehrlein GS, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 15(4), 1881 (1997)
Schaepkens M, Standaert TEFM, Rueger NR, Sebel PGM, Oehrlein GS, Cook JM, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(1), 26 (1999)