In this study, we present results of a mathematical model in which the governing equations of electroforming process were solved using a robust finite element solver (COMSOL Multiphysics). The effects of different parameters including applied current density, solution electrical conductivity, electrode spacing, and anode height on the copper electroforming process have been investigated. An electroforming experiment using copper electroforming cell was conducted to verify the developed model. The obtained results show that by increasing the applied current density, the electroforming process takes place faster, thereby resulting in a higher thickness of the electroformed layer. In addition, higher applied current density led to non-uniformity of the coated layer. It was revealed that by increasing electrolytic conductivity from 5 to 20 S/m, the electroformed layer became thicker. By considering three different anode heights, it was found that if the cathode and anode are the same height, the process will be more effective. Finally, it was concluded that there is an optimum value of anode-cathode spacing: above it, energy consumption and plating time are high; while below it, the resultant layer is non-uniform. The present study demonstrates that the developed model can accurately capture the physics of electroforming with a reasonable computational time.

Electroforming Numerical Simulation Finite Element Method Thickness Distribution Rotating Electrode

Blum W, Hogaboom GB, Principles of electroplating and electroforming, McGraw-Hill, New York (1949).
Zhai K, Du L, Wang W, Zhu H, Zhao W, Zhao W, Ultrason. Sonochem., 42, 368 (2018)
Yang L, Atanasova T, Radisic A, Deconinck J, West AC, Vereecken P, Electrochim. Acta, 104, 242 (2013)
Yang H, Kang SW, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu., 40, 1065 (2000)
Kobayashi T, Kawasaki J, Mihara K, Honma H, Electrochim. Acta, 47(1-2), 85 (2001)
Li JD, Zhang P, Wu YH, Liu YS, Xuan M, Microsyst Technol., 15, 505 (2009)
Tan YJ, Lim KY, Surf. Coat. Technol., 167, 255 (2003)
Park CW, Park KY, Results Phys., 4, 107 (2014)
Gabe DR, Plat. Surf. Finish., 82, 69 (1995)
Yang JM, Kim DH, Zhu D, Wang K, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 48, 329 (2008)
Pei HZ, Zhang J, Zhang GL, Huang P, Adv. Mater. Res., 479, 497 (2012)
Tong L, Tertiary current distributions on rotating electrodes, Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference (2011).
Belov I, Zanella C, Edstrom C, Leisner P, Mater. Des., 90, 693 (2016)
Rosales M, Perez T, Nava JL, Electrochim. Acta, 194, 338 (2016)
Perez T, Nava JL, J. Electroanal. Chem., 719, 106 (2014)
Elshenawy T, PROPELLANT-EXPLOS-PYROTECH, 41(1), 69 (2016)
Low CTJ, Roberts EPL, Walsh FC, Electrochim. Acta, 52(11), 3831 (2007)
Eisenberg M, Tobias C, Wilke C, J. Electrochem. Soc., 101, 306 (1954)
COMSOL Multiphysics, 2017. User’s Guide, Version 5.3a. Comsol Inc.
Dickinson EJ, Ekstrom H, Fontes E, Electrochem. Commun., 40, 71 (2014)
Sabooniha E, Rokhforouz MR, Ayatollahi S, Oil GasSci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies Nouvelles, 74, 78 (2019).
Rokhforouz MR, Akhlaghi Amiri HA, Adv. Water Resour., 124, 84 (2019)
Shukla A, Free M, Modeling and measuring electrodeposition parameters near electrode surfaces to facilitate cell performance optimization, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Utah (2013).
Elshenawy T, Soliman S, Hawwas A, Def. Technol., 13, 439 (2017)
Obaid N, Sivakumaran R, Lui J, Okunade A, Modelling the electroplating of hexavalent chromium, COMSOL Conference. Boston2013 (2013).
Pillai KC, Chung SJ, Moon IS, Chemosphere, 73, 1505 (2008)