Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received February 13, 2021
Accepted August 3, 2021
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Investigation of anti-condensation strategies in the methanol synthesis reactor using computational fluid dynamics
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 71345, Iran 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, 75169, Iran
mirvakili@pgu.ac.ir, mirvakili96@gmail.com
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, October 2021, 38(10), 2020-2033(14), 10.1007/s11814-021-0916-z
Download PDF
Abstract
Flow mal-distribution in the shell side of the gas-cooled conventional reactor (CR) in the mega methanol plant is responsible for producing gas condensate in the catalytic zone. This phenomenon leads to catalyst agglomeration and efficiency reduction in the reactor. In this study, two novel and viable strategies, possible to be implemented in working reactors, are introduced to prevent condensation. In the first strategy, co-current mode (CCM), the reactant flow changes from counter-current into the co-current. In this regard, the feed inlet is replaced from the bottom of the reactor into the top. In the second strategy, changed-bed mode (CBM), the catalyst particles at the last two meters of the reactor are replaced with non-reactive ceramic balls. The results for three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in CR have been validated against previous study and industrial data, indicating close agreement. The main advantage of CCM and CBM is that the sudden temperature drop fails to occur at the end of the reactor. Consequently, the higher temperature of the products prevents water and methanol condensation. In addition, the CCM leads to a milder temperature profile throughout the shell side, which increases catalyst durability.
Keywords
References
Leonzio G, J. CO2 Utilization, 27, 2326 (2018)
Chen L, Jiang QZ, Song ZZ, Posarac D, Chem. Eng. Technol., 34(5), 817 (2011)
Sadeghi S, Vafajoo L, Kazemeini M, Fattahi M, APCBEE Procedia, 10, 84 (2014)
Mirvakili A, Rahimpour M, Appl. Therm. Eng., 91, 1059 (2015)
Mirvakili A, Bakhtyari A, Rahimpour MR, Appl. Therm. Eng., 128, 64 (2018)
Samimi F, Karimipourfard D, Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 140, 44 (2018)
Keshavarz A, Mirvakili A, Chahibakhsh S, Shariati A, Rahimpour M, Chem. Eng. Processing-Process Intensification, 158, 108176 (2020)
Nasrollahi F, Bakeri G, Ismail AF, Rahimnejad M, Imanian M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(10), 1867 (2013)
Rahimpour MR, Lotfinejad A, Chem. Eng. Process., 47(9-10), 1819 (2008)
Eksiri Z, Mozdianfard MR, Mirvakili A, Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 162, 212 (2020)
Luyben WL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(13), 6150 (2010)
Rahmatmand B, Rahimpour MR, Keshavarz P, Fuel Process. Technol., 193, 159 (2019)
Mirvakili A, Chahibakhsh S, Ebrahimzadehsarvestani M, Soroush E, Rahimpour M, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Engineers, 104, 40 (2019)
Redondo B, et al., Chem. Eng. Processing-Process Intensification, 143, 107606 (2019).
Manenti F, Leon-Garzona A, Bozzano GG, Chem. Eng. Trans, 35 (2013).
Son M, Woo Y, Kwak G, Lee YJ, Park MJ, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 145, 118776 (2019)
Pavlisic A, Hus M, Prasnikar A, Likozar B, J. Clean Prod., 275, 122958 (2020)
Hus M, Kopac D, Stefancic N, Jurkovic D, Likozar B, Catal. Sci. Technol., 7, 5900 (2017)
Kopac D, Hus M, Ogrizek M, Likozar B, J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 17941 (2017)
Balduzzi F, Bianchini A, Maleci R, Ferrara G, Ferrari L, Renew. Energy, 85, 419 (2016)
Xia B, Sun DW, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 34, 5 (2002).
Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Commun., 194(10-12), 1638 (2007)
Kopetsch H, Process and plant for producing methanol, in, Lurgi GmbH (2011).
Tijm PJA, Waller FJ, Brown DM, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221(1-2), 275 (2001)
Miieller D, Bormann A, Process and plant for producing methanol, in, LURGI GMBH (2011).
Cui X, Kær SK, Chem. Eng. J., 393, 124632 (2020)
Marlin DS, Sarron E, Sigurbjornsson O, Front. Chem., 6, 446 (2018)
Zhang J, Liu T, Huang Q, Luo Z, Lu A, Zhu L, Mater. Chem. Phys., 255, 123611 (2020)
Lakhani S, Raul A, Saha SK, Appl. Therm. Eng., 123, 458 (2017)
Dubovsky V, Ziskind G, Letan R, Appl. Therm. Eng., 31, 3453 (2011)
Ansys AF, 15.0 User’s Guide, ANSYS, Inc., United States (2013).
Fluent A, ANSYS fluent theory guide 15.0, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA, 33 (2013).
Yao ZQ, Shen HC, Gao H, J. Hydrodynamics, 25, 131 (2013)
Peter M, Fichtl MB, Ruland H, Kaluza S, Muhler M, Hinrichsen O, Chem. Eng. J., 203, 480 (2012)
Ferziger JH, Peric M, Computational methods for fluid dynamics, Springer (2002).
Chen L, Jiang QZ, Song ZZ, Posarac D, Chem. Eng. Technol., 34(5), 817 (2011)
Sadeghi S, Vafajoo L, Kazemeini M, Fattahi M, APCBEE Procedia, 10, 84 (2014)
Mirvakili A, Rahimpour M, Appl. Therm. Eng., 91, 1059 (2015)
Mirvakili A, Bakhtyari A, Rahimpour MR, Appl. Therm. Eng., 128, 64 (2018)
Samimi F, Karimipourfard D, Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 140, 44 (2018)
Keshavarz A, Mirvakili A, Chahibakhsh S, Shariati A, Rahimpour M, Chem. Eng. Processing-Process Intensification, 158, 108176 (2020)
Nasrollahi F, Bakeri G, Ismail AF, Rahimnejad M, Imanian M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(10), 1867 (2013)
Rahimpour MR, Lotfinejad A, Chem. Eng. Process., 47(9-10), 1819 (2008)
Eksiri Z, Mozdianfard MR, Mirvakili A, Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 162, 212 (2020)
Luyben WL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(13), 6150 (2010)
Rahmatmand B, Rahimpour MR, Keshavarz P, Fuel Process. Technol., 193, 159 (2019)
Mirvakili A, Chahibakhsh S, Ebrahimzadehsarvestani M, Soroush E, Rahimpour M, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Engineers, 104, 40 (2019)
Redondo B, et al., Chem. Eng. Processing-Process Intensification, 143, 107606 (2019).
Manenti F, Leon-Garzona A, Bozzano GG, Chem. Eng. Trans, 35 (2013).
Son M, Woo Y, Kwak G, Lee YJ, Park MJ, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 145, 118776 (2019)
Pavlisic A, Hus M, Prasnikar A, Likozar B, J. Clean Prod., 275, 122958 (2020)
Hus M, Kopac D, Stefancic N, Jurkovic D, Likozar B, Catal. Sci. Technol., 7, 5900 (2017)
Kopac D, Hus M, Ogrizek M, Likozar B, J. Phys. Chem. C, 121, 17941 (2017)
Balduzzi F, Bianchini A, Maleci R, Ferrara G, Ferrari L, Renew. Energy, 85, 419 (2016)
Xia B, Sun DW, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 34, 5 (2002).
Rahimpour MR, Chem. Eng. Commun., 194(10-12), 1638 (2007)
Kopetsch H, Process and plant for producing methanol, in, Lurgi GmbH (2011).
Tijm PJA, Waller FJ, Brown DM, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221(1-2), 275 (2001)
Miieller D, Bormann A, Process and plant for producing methanol, in, LURGI GMBH (2011).
Cui X, Kær SK, Chem. Eng. J., 393, 124632 (2020)
Marlin DS, Sarron E, Sigurbjornsson O, Front. Chem., 6, 446 (2018)
Zhang J, Liu T, Huang Q, Luo Z, Lu A, Zhu L, Mater. Chem. Phys., 255, 123611 (2020)
Lakhani S, Raul A, Saha SK, Appl. Therm. Eng., 123, 458 (2017)
Dubovsky V, Ziskind G, Letan R, Appl. Therm. Eng., 31, 3453 (2011)
Ansys AF, 15.0 User’s Guide, ANSYS, Inc., United States (2013).
Fluent A, ANSYS fluent theory guide 15.0, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA, 33 (2013).
Yao ZQ, Shen HC, Gao H, J. Hydrodynamics, 25, 131 (2013)
Peter M, Fichtl MB, Ruland H, Kaluza S, Muhler M, Hinrichsen O, Chem. Eng. J., 203, 480 (2012)
Ferziger JH, Peric M, Computational methods for fluid dynamics, Springer (2002).
