Offshore plants have many inherent constraints and risks compared to onshore plants, and it is crucial to optimize the operation of the offshore plant by adhering to constraints. Previous studies proposed a framework of utility systems that operate under various conditions. However, few studies have addressed the optimization of utility systems during the operating life cycle. To fill in this gap, we propose a new methodology for the design and optimization of the utility systems in the offshore plants. The utility systems are designed and optimized in Aspen Utilities Planner, considering the full life cycle of the oil and gas wells. For this, we first developed steady-state models of the topside processes based on every feasible operating scenario throughout the full life cycle. Then the utility consumption data was extracted from the simulation results and analyzed. The power system was designed using Aspen Utilities Planner (AUP), and it was optimized to maximize the thermal efficiency of the utility system, satisfying power demand for all the scenarios. The optimized results illustrate the significant saving of the operating cost and reduction of CO2 emission rate. Our studies suggest a generic framework to design utility systems in offshore plants.

Modeling Offshore Plant Optimization Topside Process Utility System

IEA, World Energy Outlook 2019, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris (2019).
IEA, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris (2019).
Vo TK, Kim WS, Kim JS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37(7), 1206 (2020)
Romeo LM, Bolea I, Escosa JM, Appl. Therm. Eng., 28, 1039 (2008)
Rao AB, Rubin ES, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4467 (2002)
Muis ZA, Hashim H, Manan ZA, Taha FM, Douglas PL, Renew. Energy, 35(11), 2562 (2010)
Williams LM, Smulders LH, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (1982).
Vilela P, Heo SK, Hwangbo SH, Yoo CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37(7), 1116 (2020)
Tica A, Gueguen H, Dumur D, Faille D, Davelaar F, Appl. Energy, 98, 256 (2012)
Riboldi L, Nord LO, Energy Conv. Manag., 148, 860 (2017)
Vidoza JA, Andreasen JG, Haglind F, dos Reis MML, Gallo W, Energy, 176, 656 (2019)
Nguyen TV, Modelling, analysis and optimisation of energy systems on offshore platforms, DTU Mechanical Engineering (2014).
Cho YH, Kwon SJ, Hwang SW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(1), 20 (2018)
Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics, MaGraw-Hill Education, New York (2018).
Towler G, Sinnott RK, Chemical engineering design principles, practice and economics of plant and process design, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2013).
Jeong HJ, Norman D, Zhang D, Eng. Sci., 4, 43 (2013)
Diban P, Foo DCY, Energy, 146, 98 (2017)
Gerrard GT, Offshore electrical engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2013).
Kehlhofer R, Hannemann F, Rukes B, Stirnimann F, Combined-cycle gas & steam turbine power plants, PennWell, Tulsa (2009).
Ohji A, Haraguchi M, Advances in steam turbines for modern power plants, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (2017).
Saddiq HA, Perry S, Ndagana SF, Mohammed A, J. Sci. Eng. Res., 6, 925 (2015)
Saravanamuttoo HIH, Rogers GFC, Cohen H, Gas turbine theory, Pearson Education, London (2001).
Bolland O, Thermal power generation, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, NTNU, 101 (2008).
Rajesh R, Kishore PS, Int. J. Eng. Manage. Res., 8, 229 (2018)
Chakrabarti S, Handbook of offshore engineering, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2005).
Devold H, Oil and gas production handbook an introduction to oil and gas production, transport, refining and petrochemical industry, lulu.com, Morrisville (2013).
Rahim MA, J. Energy Eng., 138, 136 (2012)
Narasimharao V, Kumar R, Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Technol., 2, 190 (2015)
Brady MF, Materials at HTs, 18, 223 (2001)
Valdes M, Rapun JL, Appl. Therm. Eng., 21, 1149 (2001)
Nord LO, Bolland O, Appl. Therm. Eng., 54, 85 (2013)
Boyce MP, Gas turbine engineering handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2012).
Varbanov PS, Doyle S, Smith R, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 82(5), 561 (2004)