ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received December 2, 2020
Accepted March 10, 2021
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

CO and C3H6 oxidation over La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 catalysts: Influence of preparation solvent

1Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071003, P. R. China 2MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China 3Advanced Research Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, QiLu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Science), Jinan 250353, Shandong Province, P. R. China
liping@ncepu.edu.cn
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, May 2021, 38(5), 945-951(7), 10.1007/s11814-021-0781-9
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

High surface area powders, La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 (LSCO), were prepared by a hard template method with a template of SBA-15. In the preparation process, the solvent was ethanol, the mixture of ethanol and water, and water, respectively. Characterizations were performed to understand the properties of the catalysts. When the solvent is a mixture of ethanol and water, the prepared LSCO has the most easily extracted surface adsorbed oxygen in the H2 atmosphere, exhibiting the best light-off performances for CO oxidation. However, the LSCO prepared in ethanol solvent has the best lattice oxygen mobility, resulting in the best light-off performance for C3H6 oxidation. Moreover, the LSCO prepared in ethanol also shows the best catalytic activity for both CO and C3H6 oxidation under the conditions of simulated diesel exhaust. Furthermore, Pd was impregnated on the LSCO, which was prepared by a sol-gel method and a hard template method, separately; the later one shows higher CO and C3H6 catalytic oxidation activity.

References

Xu JN, Lu GZ, Guo Y, Guo YL, Gong XQ, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 535, 1 (2017)
Kim CH, Qi GS, Dahlberg K, Li W, Science, 327(5973), 1624 (2010)
Russell A, Epling WS, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 53(4), 337 (2011)
Tang WX, Xiao W, Wang SB, Ren Z, Ding J, Gao PX, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 226, 585 (2018)
Auvray X, Olsson L, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 168-169, 342 (2015)
Pinto D, Glisenti A, Catal. Sci. Technol., 9, 2749 (2019)
Glisenti A, Vittadini A, Catalysts, 9, 312 (2019)
Ziaei-Azad H, Khodadadi A, Esmaeilnejad-Ahranjani P, Mortazavi Y, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 102(1-2), 62 (2011)
Li P, Yang QY, Zhang H, Yao MX, Yan F, Fu D, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 45(20), 11802 (2020)
Cimino S, Lisi L, De Rossi S, Faticanti M, Porta P, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 43(4), 397 (2003)
Kucharczyk B, Tylus W, Catal. Today, 90(1-2), 121 (2004)
Chen J, Shen M, Wang X, Wang J, Su Y, Zhao Z, Catal. Commun., 37, 105 (2013)
Chen J, Shen M, Wang X, Qi G, Wang J, Li W, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 134-135, 251 (2013)
Onrubia JA, Pereda-Ayo B, De-La-Torre U, Gonzalez-Velasco JR, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 213, 198 (2017)
Ponce S, Pena MA, Fierro JLG, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 24(3-4), 193 (2000)
Teng F, Han W, Liang SH, Gaugeu BG, Zong RL, Zhu YF, J. Catal., 250(1), 1 (2007)
Zhang C, Hua W, Wang C, Guo Y, Guo Y, Lu G, Baylet A, Giroir-Fendler A, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 134-135, 310 (2013)
Mota N, Alvarez-Galvan MC, Navarro RM, Al-Zahrani SM, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 113-114, 271 (2012)
Xiao P, Zhu J, Li H, Jiang W, Wang T, Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Li J, Chemcatchem, 6, 1774 (2014)
Landau MV, Titelman L, Vradman L, Wilson P, Chem. Commun., 5, 594 (2003)
Wang XG, Landau MV, Rotter H, Vradman L, Wolfson A, Erenburg A, J. Catal., 222(2), 565 (2004)
Li P, Chen X, Li Y, Schwank JW, Catal. Today, 364, 7 (2021)
Li P, Chen X, Ma L, Bhat A, Li Y, Schwank JW, Catal. Sci. Technol., 9, 1165 (2019)
Lupescu JA, Schwank JW, Dahlberg KA, Seo CY, Fisher GB, Peczonczyk SL, Rhodes K, Jagner MJ, Haack LP, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 183, 343 (2016)
Ma L, Seo CY, Chen X, Sun K, Schwank JW, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 222, 444 (2018)
Luo J, Meng M, Zha Y, Guo L, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 15293 (2008)
Ma L, Seo CY, Chen X, Sun K, Schwank JW, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 222, 444 (2018)
Li P, Chen X, Li Y, Schwank JW, Catal. Today, 327, 90 (2018)
Li P, Dong R, Jiang X, Zhang S, Liu T, Wang R, Yan F, Fu D, J. Electroanal. Chem., 873, 114513 (2020)
Ma L, Seo CY, Chen XY, Li JH, Schwank JW, Chem. Eng. J., 350, 419 (2018)
Aghabararnejad M, Patience GS, Chaouki J, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 92(11), 1903 (2014)
Hosokawa S, Tada R, Shibano T, Matsumoto S, Teramura K, Tanaka T, Catal. Sci. Technol., 6, 7868 (2016)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로