ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received March 25, 2022
Accepted July 19, 2022
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Study on temperature characteristics of gasoline engine particulate filters during fuel cut-off

School of Vehicles and Energy, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China 1Suzhou Automotive Research Institute of Tsinghua Univresity, Suzhou 215000, China
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, December 2022, 39(12), 3434-3441(8), 10.1007/s11814-022-1237-6
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

Based on the bench test of a 1.5 L gasoline engine equipped with a catalytic gasoline engine particulate filter (CGPF), the fuel cut-off regeneration characteristics of the next generation with small pore size GPF and the common GPF under different soot loading and temperatures were studied. The results showed that after the fuel was cutoff during the regeneration process, the center temperature of the sample rose exponentially, and as the regeneration time extended, the temperature gradually became flat. The temperature distribution inside the carrier was such that the inlet temperature was low at the axial position, and the temperature near the outlet was high, the radial position showed a trend of high temperature in the middle and low temperature at the edge, and the temperature difference between the edge and the center of the carrier was large. The maximum temperature inside the GPF increased with the increase in soot loading, and the maximum temperature gradient also increased. When the soot loading reached 6 g/L and the fuel cut-off regeneration was conducted at 650 ℃, the maximum and maximum temperature gradient inside the GPF exceeded the tolerance limit of the GPF, and the inside of the carrier was damaged to varying degrees. Therefore, these parameters should be controlled during regeneration.

References

Mamakos A, Martini G, Marotta A, Manfredi U, J. Aerosol Sci., 63, 115 (2013)
Gong C, Si X, Liu F, Fuel, 303, 121262 (2021)
Liu X, Chanko T, Lambert C, Maricq M, SAE Int. Technical Paper, 2018-01-1259 (2018).
Du J, Sun WC, Guo L, Xiao SL, Tan MZ, Li GL, Fan LY, Energy Conv. Manag., 100, 300 (2015)
Zhong WJ, Xuan TM, He ZX, Wang Q, Li D, Zhang X, Huang YY, Energy Conv. Manag., 121, 241 (2016)
Liang B, Ge YS, Tan JW, Han XK, Gao LP, Hao LJ, Ye WT, Dai PP, J. Aerosol Sci., 57, 21 (2013)
Zhang MM, Hong W, Xie FX, Su Y, Liu HT, Zhou ST, Energy Conv. Manag., 164, 344 (2018)
Ko JY, Kim KJ, Chung WY, Myung CL, Park S, Fuel, 238, 363 (2019)
Bonatesta F, Chiappetta E, Rocca L, Appl. Energy, 124, 366 (2014)
Zhong WJ, Tamilselvan P, Wang Q, He ZX, Feng H, Yu X, Energy, 153, 349 (2018)
Distaso E, Amirante R, Tamburrano P, Reite D, Energy Conv. Manag., 184, 24 (2019)
Wang JJ, Yan FW, Fang N, Yan D, Zhang GQ, Wang Y, Yang WL, Energies, 13, 1 (2020)
Xie FX, Hong W, Su Y, Zhang MM, Jiang BP, Energy Conv. Manag., 142, 69 (2017)
Choi S, Oh K, Lee C, Energy, 77, 327 (2014)
Piqueras P, Sanchis E, Herreros J, Tsolakis A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 234, 116437 (2021)
Saito C, Nakatani T, Miyairi Y, Yuuki K, Vogt C, Technical Paper, 2011-01-0814 (2011).
Badshah H, Kittelson D, Northrop W, SAE Int. J. Engines, 9, 1775 (2016)
Tandon P, Heibel A, Whitmore J, Kekre N, Chithapragada K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 4715 (2010)
Meng ZW, Chen Z, Tan J, Wang W, Zhan ZL, Huang JF, Fang J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 248, 117114 (2022)
Chan T, Saffaripour M, Liu FS, Hendren J, Thomson K, Kubsh J, Brezny R, Rideout G, Emission Control Sci. Technol., 2, 75 (2016)
Zuo QS, Tang YY, Chen W, Zhang JP, Shi L, Xie Y, Fuel, 265, 117001 (2020)
Bermudez V, Serrano JR, Piqueras P, Garcia O, Appl. Energy, 140, 234 (2015)
Landi G, Sarli V, Lisi L, Topics Catal, 64, 270 (2021)
Palma V, Meloni E, Fuel, 181, 421 (2016)
Stępień Z, Ziemiański L, Żak G, Wojtasik M, Jeczmionek L, Burnus Z, Fuel, 161, 278 (2015)
Sarli VD, Benedetto AD, AIChE J., 64, 1714 (2018)
Sarli VD, Landi G, Benedetto AD, Lisi L, Topics Catal., 64, 256 (2021)
Soltani S, Andersson R, Andersson B, Fuel, 220, 453 (2018)
Boger T, Rose D, Nicolin P, Gunasekaran N, Glasson T, Emission Control Sci. Technol., 1, 49 (2015)
Feng X, Liu H, Li W, He S, Lu Z, SAE Technical Paper, 2019- 01-0968 (2019).
Nicolin P, Rose D, Kunath F, Boger T, SAE Int. J. Engines, 8, 1253 (2015)
Konstandopoulos AG, Kostoglou M, Housiada P, SAE Technical Paper, 110, 609 (2001)
Kurien C, Srivastava AK, Gandigudi N, Anand K, J. Energy Inst., 93, 463 (2020)
Belot I, Vidal D, Greiner R, Votsmeier M, Hayes RE, Bertrand F, Chem. Eng. J., 406, 127040 (2021)
Benajes J, García A, Monsalve-Serrano J, Balloul I, Pradel G, Energy Conv. Manag., 123, 381 (2016)
Meng ZW, Chen C, Li JS, Fang J, Tan J, Qin Y, Jiang Y, Qin ZH, Bai WL, Liang K, Fuel, 262, 116589 (2020)
Gong J, Stewart ML, Zelenyuk A, Strzelec A, Viswanathan S, Rothamer DA, Foster DE, Rutland CJ, Chem. Eng. J., 338, 15 (2018)
Nakayama H, Banno Y, Mochizuki H, Hara H, Takayama A, Nagata M, Sasaki Y, Yoneyama S, Topics Catal., 62, 419 (2019)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로