ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received August 12, 2021
Accepted October 12, 2021
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

Reactive force-field simulation of the effect of heating rate on pyrolysis behavior of lignite

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China 1Department of Power Operation, Huaneng Qinbei Power Generation Co. Ltd., Jiyuan, 454650, China
rlx888@126.com
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 2022, 39(3), 576-585(10), 10.1007/s11814-021-0981-3
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

With the help of ReaxFF-MD simulations, the non-isothermal pyrolysis behavior of lignite, especially the effect of heating rate on pyrolysis products, has been investigated in detail. The results demonstrate that increasing the heating rate is very helpful for the production of tar at lower heating rates. By contrast, at relatively high heating rates, further increasing the heating rate has less effect on the distribution of pyrolysis products. Moreover, the evolution tendencies of char and tar at lower heating rates are different from those at the relatively higher heating rates, which exist as remarkable turning points in the high temperature region. This is probably because the reaction time is longer at_x000D_ lower heating rates, and the possibilities of condensation and further decomposition of tar are much greater at high temperatures. Additionally, the relationship between system energy and reaction mechanism was revealed. The results indicate that with the same reaction mechanism, the system energies of non-isothermal pyrolysis are approximately equal and hardly affected by the heating rate. Finally, taking 2 K/ps as an example, the secondary reaction mechanism of tar was further analyzed, and some possible secondary reaction pathways were proposed.

References

Xin HH, Wang H, Kang WJ, Di CC, Qi XY, Zhong XX, Wang DM, Liu FM, Fuel, 259, 116226 (2020)
Yang YM, Liu JZ, He X, Wang ZH, Zhou JH, Cen KF, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34, 1250 (2017)
Ding L, Zhou ZJ, Dai ZH, Yu GS, Appl. Energy, 155, 660 (2015)
Liu P, Zhang DX, Wang LL, Zhou Y, Pan TY, Lu XL, Appl. Energy, 163, 254 (2016)
Liu SC, Zhao HY, Liu XY, Li YH, Zhao GF, Wang YG, Zeng M, Fuel, 279, 118485 (2020)
Zhu LL, Zhong ZP, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37, 10 (2020)
Niu ZY, Liu GJ, Yin H, Zhou CC, Wu D, Yousaf B, Wang CM, Energy Convers. Manag., 124, 180 (2016)
Ye CP, Huang HJ, Li XH, Li WY, Feng J, Fuel, 207, 85 (2017)
Yu WH, Han S, Lei ZP, Zhang K, Yan JC, Li ZK, Shui HF, Kang SG, Wang ZC, Ren SB, Pan CX, Fuel, 244, 22 (2019)
Lin XC, Wang CH, Ideta K, Miyawaki J, Nishiyama Y, Wang YG, Yoon S, Mochida I, Fuel, 118, 257 (2014)
Zhan JH, Wu RC, Liu XX, Gao SQ, Xu GW, Fuel, 134, 283 (2014)
Li XX, Mo Z, Liu J, Guo L, Mol. Simul., 41, 13 (2015)
Zhao L, Gao JS, Xu CM, Petrol. Sci. Technol., 24, 1395 (2006)
Li GY, Ding JX, Zhang H, Hou CX, Wang F, Li YY, Liang YH, Fuel, 154, 243 (2015)
Zheng M, Li XX, Wang MJ, Guo L, Fuel, 253, 910 (2019)
Liang YH, Wang F, Zhang H, Wang JP, Li YY, Li CY, Fuel Process. Technol., 147, 1 (2016)
Liu Q, Liu SX, Lv YD, Hu P, Huang YJ, Kong MQ, Li GX, Fuel, 287, 119484 (2021)
Chen B, Diao ZJ, Lu HY, Fuel, 116, 7 (2014)
Zheng M, Li XX, Nie FG, Guo L, Energy Fuels, 31, 3675 (2017)
Zhang TT, Li XX, Qiao XJ, Zheng M, Guo L, Song WL, Lin WG, Energy Fuels, 30, 3140 (2016)
Chenoweth K, van Duin ACT, Goddard WA, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 1040 (2008)
Newsome DA, Sengupta D, Foroutan H, Russo MF, van Duin ACT, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 16111 (2012)
Senftle TP, Hong S, Islam MM, Kylasa SB, Zheng YX, Shin YK, Junkermeie C, Engel-Herbert R, Janik MJ, Aktulga HM, Verstraelen T, Grama A, van Duin ACT, Npj Comput. Mater, 2, 15011 (2016)
van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 9396 (2001)
Van Duin ACT, Strachan A, Stewman S, Zhang QS, Xu X, Goddard WA, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 3803 (2003)
Xu F, Pan S, Liu CG, Zhao D, Liu H, Wang Q, Liu Y, RSC Adv., 7, 41512 (2017)
Li ZK, Wei XY, Yan HL, Zong ZM, Fuel, 153, 176 (2015)
Zheng M, Li XX, Nie FG, Guo L, Mol. Simul., 43, 13 (2017)
Xu F, Liu H, Wang Q, Pan S, Zhao D, Liu Y, Fuel, 256, 115884 (2019)
Ma TZ, Hu TT, Jiang DD, Zhang JL, Li W, Han Y, ?rmeci B, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35, 4 (2018)
Zheng M, Wang Z, Li XX, Qiao XJ, Song WL, Guo L, Fuel, 177, 130 (2016)
Castro-Marcano F, Kamat AM, Russo MF, van Duin AC, Mathews JP, Combust. Flame, 159, 1272 (2012)
Chen C, Zhao LL, Wang JF, Lin SC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
Li YY, Li GY, Zhang H, Wang JP, Li AQ, Liang YH, Fuel, 193, 331 (2017)
Akhtar J, Amin NS, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 16, 5101 (2012)
Xu F, Liu H, Wang Q, Pan S, Zhao D, Liu Q, Liu Y, Fuel Process. Technol., 195, 106147 (2019)
Tian B, Qiao YY, Tian YY, Liu Q, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 121, 376 (2016)
Hu JH, Si YH, Yang HP, Shao JG, Wang XH, Lei TZ, Agblevor FA, Chen HP, Energy Convers. Manag., 152, 229 (2017)
Hong D, Guo X, Fuel, 210, 58 (2017)
Morgan TJ, Kandiyoti R, Chem. Rev., 114, 3 (2014)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로