ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received September 11, 2021
Accepted December 20, 2021
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

CFD prediction of mixing performance for circular and non-circular jet mixing tanks

Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand 1Program in Food Process Engineering, School of Food Industry, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
santi_wattananusorn@hotmail.com
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, June 2022, 39(6), 1424-1435(12), 10.1007/s11814-021-1051-6
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

Our previous CFD predictions of the circular, elliptic, and square jet mixing tanks were re-analyzed to investigate the highest performance jet mixing tank design and the appropriate mixing performance criterion. So, the mixing performance indicated by overall mixing time and maximum mixing time criteria of these jet mixing tanks was compared. These CFD predictions were carefully developed by using our previous reliable jet mixing tank CFD model. For model validation, reasonable agreement between the predicted mixing times and measurements was observed. The results revealed that circular and non-circular jet flow phenomena were significantly different in the near field jet regions. Further, the elliptic jet mixing tank provided the highest mixing performance because of its highest entrainment and turbulence kinetic energy near the jet boundary. Finally, it can be concluded that the maximum mixing time criterion is a suitable mixing performance indicator.

References

Fossett H, Prosser LE, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 160, 224 (1949)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(11), 3050 (2016)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Wattananusorn S, J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng., 42(5), 428 (2019)
Brooker L, Chem. Eng., 30, 16 (1993)
Patwardhan AW, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(8), 1307 (2002)
Zughbi HD, Ahmad I, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(4), 1052 (2005)
Jaiklom N, Bumrungthaichaichan E, Wattananusorn S, Ladkrabang Eng. J., 30(4), 37 (2013)
Raja T, Kalaichelvi P, Anantharaman N, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 66(7), 522 (2007)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Jaiklom N, Namkanisorn A, Wattananusorn S, Sci. Res. Essays, 11(4), 42 (2016)
Zughbi HD, Rakib MA, Chem. Eng. Commun., 189(8), 1038 (2002)
Jorakit T, Phaiboonsilpa N, Namkanisorn A, Ponpo P, Bumrungthaichaichan E, Wattananusorn S, MATEC Web of Conferences, 192, 03019 (2018)
Sendilkumar KK, Kalaichelvi P, Perumalsamy M, Arunagiri A, Raja T, in World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2007, San Francisco, U.S.A. (2007).
Zughbi HD, Rakib MA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(4), 829 (2004)
Phapatarinan S, Bumrungthaichaichan E, Wattananusorn S, MATEC Web of Conferences, 192, 03010 (2018)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Namkanisorn A, Wattananusorn S, J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng., 41(7), 612 (2018)
Kumar D, Vaze M, in 2nd National and 1st International conference on Fluid Flow and Thermal Sciences, India, ICAFFTS-2021- MF-H178 (2021).
Gutmark EJ, Grinstein FF, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 31, 239 (1999)
Ho CM, Gutmark EJ, J. Fluid Mech., 179, 383 (1987)
Grinstein FF, Gutmark EJ, Parr T, Phys. Fluids, 7, 1483 (1995)
Zaman KBMQ, AIAA Pap., 96 (1996)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Computational fluid dynamics simulations of pump-around jet mixing tanks, Doctoral thesis, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (2019).
Mewes D, Renz R, in 7th European Conference on Mixing, Belgium, 131 (1991).
Hoffman PD, AIChE Symp. Ser., 286(88), 77 (1996)
Schimetzek R, Steiff A, Weinspach PM, IChemE Symp. Ser., 136, 391 (1995)
Spyrou M, The diffusion coefficient of water: A neutron scattering study using molecular dynamics simulations, Master thesis, University of Surrey (2009).
Quinn WR, Militzer J, Phys. Fluids, 31(5), 1017 (1988)
ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide: Release 15.0, U.S.A. (2013).
Dange S, Recirculation Boundary Conditions in ANSYS FLUENT.
Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE, J. Fluids Eng.-Trans. ASME, 130(7), 078001 (2008)
Hussain F, Husain HS, J. Fluid Mech., 208, 257 (1989)
Schadow KC, Wilson KJ, Lee MJ, J. Propuls. Power, 3(2), 145 (1987)
Mi J, Nathan GJ, Luxton RE, Exp. Fluids, 28(1), 93 (2000)
Elsayed K, Lacor C, Comput. Fluids, 68, 134 (2012)
Pechmanee P, Namkanisorn A, Wattananusorn S, Bumrungthaichaichan E, Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., 50, 529 (2021)
Bumrungthaichaichan E, Powder Technol., 396, 327 (2022)

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로