Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received July 20, 2022
Revised October 4, 2022
Accepted October 26, 2022
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamics of discarded Bakelite
Abstract
bstractThe thermal degradation kinetics of discarded Bakelite was studied by using different model fitting, modelfree methods (Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS), Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), Friedman (FRM), Starink (STR), Li and Tang (LTA), Vyazovkin (VYZ), Avrami (AVM)) and Master plot (MP), for computing the kinetics triplets (A, Ea, and n) and also predict a suitable mechanism. The thermal degradation experiment of the sample was carried out from ambient to 1,000 o C at five different heating rates 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 o C/min. under inert gas N2 atmosphere. The thermal degradation of discarded Bakelite shows an order-based F5 - model mechanism with the activation energy (Ea) of 213 KJ/mol, and the accuracy of the Ea was also proved by KAS, FWO, and VYZ iso-conversional method. The ordered-based model for the reaction mechanism was also explained by the master plot (MP). Based on the results of the non-linear method (VYZ), the mean error percentage of Ea, which is tested for various linear ways, was found toincrease in the following order: FWO<KAS<STR<FRM<LTA and ranged from 0.115% to 23.492% for the degradation of discarded Bakelite. The change in free energy (G), change in enthalpy (H), and change in entropy (S) are 560.743 KJ/mol, 100.835 KJ/mol, and 820.989×103 JK1 mol1 ,respectively. The complete kinetic and thermodynamics analysis of the thermal degradation would help to design a process for the conversion of these wastes to high-valued carbonaceous products.
References
2. L. Xu, Q. q. Zhong, Q. Dong, L. y. Zhang and Z. Fang, J. Anal.Appl. Pyrol., 142, 104663 (2019).
3. Phenolic Resins Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Novolac, Resol), By Application (Wood Adhesives,Molding, Insulation, Laminates, Paper Impregnation, Coatings),And Segment Forecasts, 2020-2025, Report ID: 978-1-68038-271-6,https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/phenolicresins-market/segmentation,date of access:08/09/2022.
4. N. Usahanunth and S. Tuprakay, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 6, 120(2017).
5. T. Horikawa, K. Ogawa, K. Mizuno, J. Hayashi and K. Muroyama,Carbon, 41, 465 (2003).
6. T. Yamamoto, T. Ohmori and Y. Kim, Carbon, 48, 912 (2010).
7. E. Fitzer, W. Schaefer and S. Yamada, Carbon, 7, 643 (1969).
8. M. Xie, H. Dong, D. Zhang, X. Guo and W. Ding, Carbon, 49,2459 (2011).
9. M. Sobera and J. Hetper, J. Chromatogr. A, 993, 131 (2003).
10. P. Kasar and M. Ahmaruzzaman, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 78, 426 (2019).
11. W. M. Bishop and W. J. Minkowycz, AIAA J., 11(4), 438 (1973).
12. H. Jiang, J. Wang, S. Wu, B. Wang and Z. Wang, Carbon, 48, 352(2010).
13. A. Sahoo, S. Kumar and K. Mohanty, Renew. Energy, 165, 261(2021).
14. Z. Li, W. Zhou, L. Yang, P. Chen, C. Yan, C. Cai, H. Li, L. Li and Y.Shi, Polymer, 11, 1 (2019).
15. M. V. Alonso, M. Oliet, J. C. Domınguez, E. Rojo and F. Rodrıguez, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 105, 349 (2011).
16. M. A. Serio, S. Charpenay, R. Bassilakis and P. Solomon, Conference: ACS Divsion of Fuel Chemistry Preprints; Atlanta, GA, 36(2)664 (1991)
17. R. Chen, X. Xu, S. Lu, Y. Zhang and S. Lo, Energy Convers. Manag.,165, 555 (2018).
18. L. Costa, L. R. d. Montelera, G. Camino, E. D. Weil and E. M. Pearce,Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 56, 23 (1997).
19. K. Ouchi, Carbon, 4, 59 (1966).
20. J. Wang, H. Jiang and N. Jiang, Thermochim. Acta, 496, 136 (2009).
21. H. W. Wong, J. Peck, R. E. Bonomi, J. Assif, F. Panerai, G. Reinisch, J. Lachaud and N. N. Mansour, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 112,122 (2015)