Overall
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received June 12, 2024
Accepted September 11, 2024
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Most Cited
Design of Ionic Liquids for HF/HFC-245fa Supereffi cient Separation: COSMO-RS Selection and Process Assessment
Abstract
Recycling hydrofl uoric acid (HF) is a signifi cant issue within the fi eld of organofl uoride chemistry. A key obstacle in
this endeavor lies in the separation of azeotropic mixtures containing HF, such as the azeotropic mixture of HF and
1,1,1,3,3-pentafl uoropropane (HFC-245fa), which exhibit similar boiling points. This study investigates the application of
extractant distillation (ED) with ionic liquids (ILs) to achieve the separation of HF/HFC-245fa at the molecular scale, cell
dimension, and systematic level (including the optimization and analysis of ED). COSMO-RS was employed to identify
the suitable IL, with [Tf 2 N]-based ILs emerging as the most optimal extractants. Four representative [Tf 2 N]-based ILs
were chosen based on their physical properties and thermodynamic behavior, and were applied in a continuous ED process
simulation for the separation of HF/HFC-245fa using Aspen Plus, resulting in the production of 99.5 mol% HFC-245fa
and 99.5 mol% HF. The determination of the optimal operational parameters was carried out through sequential quadratic
programming, considering the purity requirements. An assessment of energy consumption analysis indicated that [C 1 Py]
[Tf 2 N] stands out as the most suitable IL for separation of HF/HFC-245fa, with heat and cooling duties of 467.82 kW and
304.80 kW, respectively. Economic analysis for the process with [C 1 Py][Tf 2 N] indicated that the annual operating costs and
equipment costs are $ 5.58 × 10 4 and $ 3.75 × 10 6 , respectively, of which the costs of IL are 93%, the total annual cost was
comparable to that of the pressure-swing distillation process, suggesting that this ED process utilizing ILs for separating
azeotropes is economically viable in terms of industrial application.