ISSN: 0256-1115 (print version) ISSN: 1975-7220 (electronic version)
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Overall

Language
English
Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Publication history
Received February 6, 2023
Accepted August 9, 2023
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

Most Cited

Techno-economic Analysis and Life Cycle Impact Assessment for the Valorisation of Kraft Lignin and Low-Voltage Hydrogen Production

School of Chemical Engineering , University of Ulsan
jdonghwi@ulsan.ac.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 2024, 41(3), 665-680(16), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00072-x

Abstract

This study presents a comparative techno-economic analysis and life cycle impact assessment of hydrogen production from

the kraft lignin depolymerization (KLD) with those produced from alkaline electrolysis cell (AEC) and proton exchange

membrane electrolysis (PEM). This process happens in a continuous modular fl ow reactor by using the phosphomolybdic

acid as a redox-active catalyst and includes depolymerizing the kraft lignin, producing vanillin, acetovanillone, and hydrogen

under a low-voltage condition. For the techno-economic analysis, fi rst, the processes were modelled by using the Aspen Plus

V12.1 software and then the results were transferred to Aspen Process Economic Analyzer V12 for economic evaluation. In

the next step, the life cycle impact assessment was proposed by using the openLCA V1.11.0 software along with the Environmental

Footprint database (MID-Point indicator), and 18 impacts were investigated. According to the techno-economic

analysis, KLD exhibits a total capital cost that surpasses that of AEC and PEM by more than 18% and 11%, respectively.

Furthermore, KLD’s equipment cost exceeds that of AEC and PEM by approximately 0.5% and 7%, respectively, and necessitates

additional components. On the other hand, the life cycle assessment revealed that KLD yields lesser environmental

impacts than AEC, while PEM exhibits the most exemplary environmental performance.

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
TEL. No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 상단으로