|
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.39, No.2, 398-407, 2022
Ultrasound-negative pressure cavitation extraction of paclitaxel from Taxus chinensis
An ultrasound-negative pressure cavitation extraction method was developed to remarkably improve the recovery efficiency of paclitaxel from Taxus chinensis. The paclitaxel yield was 94-100% through ultrasound-negative pressure cavitation extraction with an extraction time of 3 to 8min. In particular, most paclitaxel could be recovered within 3min of extraction at ultrasonic power of 380W/negative pressure of -260mmHg. Observation of the biomass surface with SEM before and after extraction showed that as the ultrasonic power and negative pressure increased, the surface was more disrupted. In addition, a pseudo-second order model was suitable for the kinetic analysis, and intraparticle diffusion played a dominant role in the overall extraction rate according to the intraparticle diffusion model. As the ultrasonic power and negative pressure increased, the extraction rate constant (6.8816-11.6105mL/mg·min), the effective diffusion coefficient (1.550 x 10-12-11.528 x 10-12m2/s), and the mass transfer coefficient (2.222 x 10-7-5.149 x 10-7 m/s) increased.
[References]
- Zhu L, Chen L, Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 24, 40, 2019
- Caillaud M, Patel NH, White A, et al., Brain Behav. Immun., 93, 172, 2021
- Jang YS, Kim JH, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 24, 529, 2019
- Ghorbani M, Pourjafar F, Saffari M, Asgari Y, Meta Gene, 26, 100800, 2020
- Sun T, Liu Y, Li M, Yu H, Piao H, Mol. Cell. Probes, 53, 101602, 2020
- Modarresi-Darreh B, Kamali K, Kalantar SM, Dehghanizadeh H, Aflatoonian B, Eurasia J. Biosci., 2, 413, 2018
- Pyo SH, Choi HJ, Han BH, J. Chromatogr. A, 1123, 15, 2006
- Kang HJ, Kim JH, Process Biochem., 99, 316, 2020
- Seo HW, Kim JH, Process Biochem., 87, 238, 2019
- Kim JH, Lim CB, Kang IS, Hong SS, Lee HS, Korean J. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 15, 337, 2000
- Kim GJ, Kim JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(6), 1023, 2015
- Kang HJ, Kim JH, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 25, 86, 2020
- Kang HJ, Kim JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36(12), 1965, 2019
- Yoo KW, Kim JH, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 23, 532, 2018
- Kim JH, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 58(2), 273, 2020
- Chen G Bu F, Chen X, Li C, Wang S, Kan J, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 112, 655, 2018
- Rakshit M, Srivastav PP, J. Food Process. Preserv., 45, e15078, 2020
- Tang W, Wang B, Wang M, Wang M, J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants, 25, 100331, 2021
- Upadhyay R, Nachiappan G, Mishra HN, Food Sci. Biotechnol., 24, 1951, 2015
- Filianty F, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 443, 012104, 2020
- Roohinejad S, Koubaa M, Barba FJ, Greiner R, Orlien V, Lebovka NI, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 52, 98, 2016
- Soria AC, Villamiel M, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 21, 323, 2010
- Tan Z, Li Q, Wang C, Zhou W, Yang Y, Wang H, Yi Y, Li F, Molecules, 22, 1483, 2017
- Kang HJ, Kim JH, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 24, 513, 2019
- Langergren S, Svenska BK, Veter. Hand., 24, 1, 1898
- Rakotondramasy-Rabesiaka L, Havet JL, Porte C, Fauduet H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 54(2), 253, 2007
- Ho YS, Harouna-Oumarou HA, Fauduet H, Porte C, Sep. Purif. Technol., 45(3), 169, 2005
- Weber WJ, Morris JC, J. Sanit. Eng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 89, 31, 1963
- Krishnan RY, Rajan KS, Sep. Purif. Technol., 157, 169, 2016
- Krishnan RY, Chandran MN, Vadivel V, Rajan KS, Sep. Purif. Technol., 170, 224, 2016
- Rakotondramasy-Rabesiaka L, Havet JL, Porte C, Fauduet H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 76(2), 126, 2010
- Wang G, Cui Q, Yin LJ, Li Y, Gao MZ, Meng Y, Li J, Zhang SD, Sep. Purif. Technol., 44, 115805, 2020
- Panda D, Manickam S, Appli. Sci., 9, 766, 2019
- Li S, Wang A, Liu L, Tian G, Xu F, Food Sci. Biotechnol., 28, 759, 2019
- Wang T, Guo N, Wang SX, Kou P, Zhao CJ, Fu YJ, Food Bioprod. Process., 108, 69, 2018
- Dular M, Pozar T, Zevnik J, Petkovsek R, Wear, 418-419, 13, 2019
- Kavitha D, Namasivayam C, Bioresour. Technol., 98(1), 14, 2007
|