Articles & Issues
- Language
- korean
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received September 5, 2007
Accepted October 9, 2007
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
위험성 평가에 기반한 화학산업의 변경관리
Management of Change in the Chemical Industries Based on Risk Assessment
광운대학교 화학공학과, 139-701 서울시 노원구 월계동 447-1 1중앙대학교 기계공학부, 156-756 서울시 동작구 흑석동 221 2(주)세이프티아, 137-895 서울시 서초구 양재동 290-4 백산빌딩 6층
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University, 447-1 Wolgye-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-701, Korea 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chungang University, 221 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-756, Korea 2SafeTia Co., Ltd., 6F, Beak San Bldg., 290-4 Yangjae-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-895, Korea
jwko@kw.ac.kr
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, February 2008, 46(1), 156-163(8), NONE Epub 28 February 2008
Download PDF
Abstract
화학공장에서는 공정 이상, 장치 수명 및 경제적 환경 등에 의하여 변경이 발생하고 있다. 그리고 변경관리는 정확한 기술적 판단근거에 의한 변경 판정, 위험도 확인 및 위험성 평가 수행 등 근본적인 공정안전 기술을 바탕으로 이루어진다. 그러나 변경관리는 경험 부족, 지식 부족 및 기술인력 부족 등의 이유로 수행하기 매우 어려운 상황에 놓여있다. 본 연구에서는 화학공장 변경관리의 취약점을 파악하고 이를 적절히 보완하여 안전성을 향상할 수 있는 변경관리 체계를 구축하였다. 위험성 평가를 기반으로 하는 변경관리 절차의 정립 및 변경 여부 판단, 변경시 위험도 산정 등 변경관리 의사결정 단계들의 명확한 판단 기준 체계 정립을 통한 장치산업의 변경관리 수행 체계를 제안하였다. 이러한 안전공학 기술이 접목된 형태의 변경관리 절차를 제안하여 화학공장의 안전성 향상을 꾀하고자 하였다.
Process change and modification, which are caused by process failure, equipment life cycle and economic environment, have been generated in the chemical plants. And the MOC (management of change) base on the reasonable process safety technology such as change judgment, hazard identification by accurate technical references and risk assessment. But it is difficult to carry out the MOC because of lack of experience, shortage of knowledge and none of process safety specialists. In this study, the MOC system which could make enhancement of safety by finding and complementing weakness of MOC in chemical facilities was developed. This developed MOC system based on QRA was recommended the obvious standard for decision-making process, MOC procedure based on risk assessment and risk estimation of the process modification. The study based on the above way sought the enhancement of safety by performing Risk Based MOC for chemical plants.
Keywords
References
Giby J, Mark K, Lisa L, J. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18(4-6), 537 (2005)
AIChE,Plant Guidelines for Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety, New York (1992)
Kwon HM, Beak JB, J. KOSOS, 21(1), 72 (2006)
Lees FP, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Second edition, Butterworths (2001)
Knowlton E, Creative Checklist Hazard and Operability Studies, Chemical Manufactures Association, Process Safety Management Workshop, Arlington, Virginia (1985)
Lees FP, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Butterworths (1980)
KOSHA Code P-26-2000 (2000)
OSHA, CFR 1910.119 Management of Change, http://www.osha.gov
The Office of The Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration, 40 CFR Part 68 (1998)
ILO, MOC Guideline, http://www.ilo.org
AIChE, Dow’s Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide(7th Ed.), New York (1994)
Parker R, Otway HJ, Knight HT, The Flixborough Disaster, Report of the Court of Inquire, HM Stationery Office, London (1975)
AIChE,Plant Guidelines for Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety, New York (1992)
Kwon HM, Beak JB, J. KOSOS, 21(1), 72 (2006)
Lees FP, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Second edition, Butterworths (2001)
Knowlton E, Creative Checklist Hazard and Operability Studies, Chemical Manufactures Association, Process Safety Management Workshop, Arlington, Virginia (1985)
Lees FP, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Butterworths (1980)
KOSHA Code P-26-2000 (2000)
OSHA, CFR 1910.119 Management of Change, http://www.osha.gov
The Office of The Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration, 40 CFR Part 68 (1998)
ILO, MOC Guideline, http://www.ilo.org
AIChE, Dow’s Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide(7th Ed.), New York (1994)
Parker R, Otway HJ, Knight HT, The Flixborough Disaster, Report of the Court of Inquire, HM Stationery Office, London (1975)
