Articles & Issues
- Language
- korean
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received July 27, 2014
Accepted September 22, 2014
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
W/O 에멀젼의 주요 구성 성분들이 모사 헤미셀룰로오스 가수분해액에 있는 초산의 제거에 미치는 영향
Effects of Main Constituents of W/O Emulsion on Removal of Acetic Acid in a Simulated Hemicellulosic Hydrolysate
군산대학교 나노화학공학과, 573-701 전라북도 군산시 대학로 558
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kunsan National University, 558 Daehak-ro, Gunsan, Chonbuk 573-701, Korea
lee40f@kunsan.ac.kr
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, December 2014, 52(6), 789-795(7), 10.9713/kcer.2014.52.6.789 Epub 1 December 2014
Download PDF
Abstract
초산은 묽은 산에 의해 처리되어 얻어진 헤미셀룰로오스 가수분해액 중 가장 양이 많을 뿐만 아니라 중대한 에탄올발효 저해물질이다. 그 가수분해액으로부터 초산을 선택적으로 제거하는데 최적인 분리시스템을 찾기 위하여 모사 헤미셀룰로오스 가수분해액으로 자일로스, 초산과 황산의 혼합물이 선택되었다. 이러한 목적을 이루기 위해 에멀젼형 액막법이 모사 헤미셀룰로오스 가수분해액으로부터 초산을 제거하는데 적용되었다. W/O 에멀젼의 주요 구성 성분들, 즉 아민계 추출제 종류, 계면활성제 조성, 첨가제 종류와 회수제의 종류 및 농도가 모사 헤미셀룰로오스 가수분해액에 있는 초산, 자일로스와 황산의 추출에 미치는 영향이 조사되었다. 특별한 실험 조건에서, 초산의 추출율은 95% 이상이었고, 자일로스의 손실은 미미하였는데, 이것은 현 에멀젼형 액막법이 경제성이 높은 공정이 될 수 있다는 것을 의미한다.
Acetic acid is the most abundant and serious ethanol fermentation inhibitor in dilute-acid hemicellulosic hydrolysates. A mixture of xylose, acetic acid and sulfuric acid was chosen as a simulated hemicellulosic hydrolysate so as to find an optimal separation system to selectively remove acetic acid from the hydrolysates. In order to attain the purpose, emulsion liquid membrane was applied to removal of acetic acid from the simulated hemicellulosic hydrolysate._x000D_
The effects of main constituents of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion, such as amine extractant type, surfactant composition, additive type, and type and concentration of stripping agent, on extraction of acetic acid, xylose, and sulfuric acid in the simulated hemicellulosic hydrolysate were investigated. Under specific experimental conditions, degree of extraction of acetic acid was higher than 95% while loss of xylose was insignificant, which means that the current emulsion liquid membrane can be an economically feasible process.
Keywords
References
Grzenia DL, Schell DJ, Wickramasinghe SR, J. Membr. Sci., 322(1), 189 (2008)
Na BI, Lee JW, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 52(2), 226 (2014)
Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Lopes S, Parajo JC, Pereira H, Girio FM, Process Biochem., 40, 1215 (2005)
Carvalho GBM, Mussatto SI, Candido EJ, Silva JBAE, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 81(2), 152 (2006)
de Mancilha IM, Karim MN, Biotechnol. Prog., 19(6), 1837 (2003)
Villarreal MLM, Prata AMR, Felipe MGA, Silva JBAE, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(1), 17 (2006)
Lee SC, Sep. Purif. Technol., 118, 540 (2013)
Weng YH, Wei HJ, Tsai TY, Chen WH, Wei TY, Hwang WS, Wang CP, Huang CP, Sep. Purif. Technol., 67(1), 95 (2009)
Zhou FL, Wang CW, Wei J, J. Membr. Sci., 429, 243 (2013)
Sainio T, Turku I, Heinonen J, Bioresour. Technol., 102(10), 6048 (2011)
Nam HG, Mun S, Process Biochem., 47, 725 (2012)
Lee SC, Bioresour. Technol., 169, 692 (2014)
Lee SC, J. Membr. Sci., 381(1-2), 237 (2011)
Lee SC, Hyun KS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(7), 1454 (2013)
Mok YS, Lee KH, Lee WK, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 65(4), 309 (1996)
O’Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE, The Merck Index, 13th ed., Merck & Co., NJ (2001)
Lee SC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(2), 207 (2008)
Skelland AHP, Meng XM, J. Membr. Sci., 158(1-2), 1 (1999)
Na BI, Lee JW, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 52(2), 226 (2014)
Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Lopes S, Parajo JC, Pereira H, Girio FM, Process Biochem., 40, 1215 (2005)
Carvalho GBM, Mussatto SI, Candido EJ, Silva JBAE, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 81(2), 152 (2006)
de Mancilha IM, Karim MN, Biotechnol. Prog., 19(6), 1837 (2003)
Villarreal MLM, Prata AMR, Felipe MGA, Silva JBAE, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(1), 17 (2006)
Lee SC, Sep. Purif. Technol., 118, 540 (2013)
Weng YH, Wei HJ, Tsai TY, Chen WH, Wei TY, Hwang WS, Wang CP, Huang CP, Sep. Purif. Technol., 67(1), 95 (2009)
Zhou FL, Wang CW, Wei J, J. Membr. Sci., 429, 243 (2013)
Sainio T, Turku I, Heinonen J, Bioresour. Technol., 102(10), 6048 (2011)
Nam HG, Mun S, Process Biochem., 47, 725 (2012)
Lee SC, Bioresour. Technol., 169, 692 (2014)
Lee SC, J. Membr. Sci., 381(1-2), 237 (2011)
Lee SC, Hyun KS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(7), 1454 (2013)
Mok YS, Lee KH, Lee WK, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 65(4), 309 (1996)
O’Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE, The Merck Index, 13th ed., Merck & Co., NJ (2001)
Lee SC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(2), 207 (2008)
Skelland AHP, Meng XM, J. Membr. Sci., 158(1-2), 1 (1999)