Articles & Issues
- Language
- korean
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received June 19, 2017
Accepted July 18, 2017
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
일체형 완속교반침전조와 섬유여과기를 이용한 반류수 인 제어시스템의 경제성 연구
Economic Assesment of Phosphorus Control System for Reject Water using a Integral Type Slow Mixing/Sedimentation Tank and Fiber Filter
㈜케이이피, 46078 부산광역시 기장군 기장읍 죽성로 282-1 1동서대학교 에너지생명공학부, 47011 부산광역시 사상구 주례로 47
KEEP Co., LTD, 282-1, Jukseong-ro, Gijang-eup, Gijang, Busan, 46078, Korea 1Division of Energy and Bio Engineering, Dongseo University, 47, Jurye-ro, Sasang-gu, Busan, 47011, Korea
jgjang@gdsu.dongseo.ac.kr
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, December 2017, 55(6), 822-829(8), 10.9713/kcer.2017.55.6.822 Epub 5 December 2017
Download PDF
Abstract
하수처리장에서의 총 인 저감을 위한 방안으로 완속교반/침전 섬유여과시스템을 적용하여 하수 방류수와 반류수를 제어하는 방법에 대해 비교·검토하였다. 물질수지를 통해 인의 최종 농도를 강화된 기준치인 0.2 mg/L로 낮추기 위해서는 약 92.4 kg T-P/day를 제거해야 되는 것으로 분석되었으며, 이를 위한 총 인 제거효율은 하수 방류수는 96%, 반류수(탈수여액)은 69.2% 이상이 되어야 한다. 총 인 제거 목표치를 달성하기 위한 시스템 운영비용을 검토하였으며, 하수방류수를 처리하는 것보다 유량은 적으나 고농도의 인을 함유한 반류수를 처리하는 것이 약품비용은 약 1/2.4, 전력비용은 약 1/120 정도로 절감되는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 반류수 처리를 위해 개발시스템인 완속교반/침전 섬유여과 시스템과 일반적인 응집침전시스템을 적용하는 경우에 대한 경제성을 검토하였으며, 완속교반/침전 섬유여과시스템이 일반적인 응집침전시스템에 비해 설치면적이 약 1/7로 작고 약품소요량 및 전력비를 포함한 연간운전비용은 약 1/1.7소요되어 개발시스템이 보다 경제성이 있는 것으로 평가되었다.
As a method to reduce the total phosphorus in sewage treatment plant, we applied the integral type slow mixing/sedimentation fiber filtration system to compare the control methods for the sewage effluent and the reject water. It was analyzed that about 92.4 kg T-P/day should be removed in order to satisfy the final concentration of phosphorus of 0.2 mg T-P/L, which is reinforced effluent standard. Therefore the total phosphorus removal efficiency should be 96% for sewage effluent and 69.2% for reject water (dehydrated filtrate) respectively. The system operation cost to achieve the target of total phosphorus removal efficiency was assessed. It has been found that the treatment cost of the reject water containing high concentration of phosphorus with a low flow rate is reduced to about 1/2.4 of the coagulant cost and about 1/120 of the electricity cost, compared to that of the sewage effluent treatment. Also the economics of the integral type slow mixing/sedimentation fiber filtration system and the general coagulation and sedimentation system were compared. It was evaluated that the development system was more economical because the installation area of the integral type slow mixing/sedimentation fiber filtration system was about 1/7 smaller than that of the general coagulation and sedimentation system, and the annual operation cost including the required amount of coagulant and electricity cost of the development system was lowered about 1/1.7 than that of the general system.
Keywords
References
Ministry of Environment, Korea, Guidelines for TMDL management (2004).
Ministry of Environment, Korea,『SEWERAGE ACT』and 『ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION ACT』 (2010).
Han River Water Management Committee, National Institute of Environmental Research, Han River Environment Research Center(2008).
Ministry of Environment, 3~4, 95~101(2005).
US. EPA REGION 10, April, Advanced treatment to achieve concentration of phosphorus(2007).
Rittmann BE, McCarty PL, Environmental Biotechnology, McGraw Hill Korea, 579~590(2002).
Neethling JB, Stensel HD, Sandino J, Tsuchihashi R, Clark D, Pramanik A, WEFTEC 2013, 423-438(2013).
Jeyanayagam S, Florida Water Resources Journal: January (2005).
John Bratby, 2nd. Ed., IWA Publishing, London-Seattle, 119-149(2006).
Hwang EJ, Cheon HC, Korean Journal of KSEE, 31(8), 673 (2009)
Jang JG, Lee SH, Park JT, Jo MC, Kim MR, Kim JS, KSWST J. Water Treatment, 22(2), 89 (2014)
Kim MH, Kim MR, Cheon YJ, Kim GH, Kim JS, Jang JG, Proceedings of the Kor. Environ. Sci. Soc. Conf., October, Daegu(2016).
Park KY, Lee K, Kim J, J. Korean Inst. Chem. Engineers, 32(5), 742 (1994)
Ministry of Environment, Korea,『SEWERAGE ACT』and 『ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM CONSERVATION ACT』 (2010).
Han River Water Management Committee, National Institute of Environmental Research, Han River Environment Research Center(2008).
Ministry of Environment, 3~4, 95~101(2005).
US. EPA REGION 10, April, Advanced treatment to achieve concentration of phosphorus(2007).
Rittmann BE, McCarty PL, Environmental Biotechnology, McGraw Hill Korea, 579~590(2002).
Neethling JB, Stensel HD, Sandino J, Tsuchihashi R, Clark D, Pramanik A, WEFTEC 2013, 423-438(2013).
Jeyanayagam S, Florida Water Resources Journal: January (2005).
John Bratby, 2nd. Ed., IWA Publishing, London-Seattle, 119-149(2006).
Hwang EJ, Cheon HC, Korean Journal of KSEE, 31(8), 673 (2009)
Jang JG, Lee SH, Park JT, Jo MC, Kim MR, Kim JS, KSWST J. Water Treatment, 22(2), 89 (2014)
Kim MH, Kim MR, Cheon YJ, Kim GH, Kim JS, Jang JG, Proceedings of the Kor. Environ. Sci. Soc. Conf., October, Daegu(2016).
Park KY, Lee K, Kim J, J. Korean Inst. Chem. Engineers, 32(5), 742 (1994)