Overall
- Language
- korean
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received October 30, 2022
Revised December 28, 2022
Accepted January 13, 2023
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Most Cited
감가압법으로 주입한 피마자유-처리 목재의 내후성 평가
Weatherproof-properties Evaluation of Castor Oil-impregnated Wood Using a Vacuum-pressure Method
Abstract
본 연구는 천연 목재방부제로서 피마자유(castor oil, CSO)의 적용 가능성을 평가하기 위하여 수행하였다. 이를 위하
여 CSO를 감가압법으로 국내외 목재수종에 주입한 후, 주입능, 용탈성, 내후성 등을 조사하였다. CSO 주입능은 수종
별 해부학적 구조의 차이로 인하여 솔송, 잎갈, 단풍, 신갈나무 순으로 측정되었으나, 모든 수종에서 목재 내로 효과적
으로 주입되었다. 용탈성의 경우, 잎갈나무를 제외하고 주입능이 높은 수종에서 용탈되는 양이 많았다. CSO의 점도 저
하를 위한 에탄올의 첨가는 주입능 및 용탈성에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 중량감소율을 이용하여 조사한 CSO-주입/용
탈 시편의 목재부후균에 대한 내후성은 대조구와 비교하여 대부분의 처리목에서 매우 우수하였다. 특히 갈색부후균인
Fomitopsis palustris에 대하여 CSO만으로 구성된 약액(CSO-2)을 처리한 대부분의 처리목에서 부후가 발생하지 않거
나, 매우 낮은 중량감소율를 보였다. 이는 주입된 CSO가 용탈과정에서 목재 내에 잔류하여 발생한 결과로서 X-ray
microscope 관찰을 통하여 CSO의 잔류를 확인할 수 있었다. 한편 CSO-2를 주입한 후, 2주간 염수에 용탈시킨 스트립
형태의 시편은 모든 절삭방향에서 길이 변화가 거의 일어나지 않았다. 또한 CSO-2 주입/용탈 시편을 야외에 2주간 노
출시킨 후, 측정한 중량증가율과 길이팽윤율도 대조구 시편과 비교하여 매우 낮아 내수성이 크게 향상된 것을 확인하
였다. 따라서 CSO는 목재부후균의 생장 억제뿐만 아니라 치수안정 효과까지 제공함으로서 다양한 실내외 환경에서 천
연 목재방부제로서 적용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.
This study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of castor oil (CSO) as a natural wood preservative.
CSO was treated into wood blocks prepared with domestic and imported wood species using a vacuum-pressure method,
and then treatability, leachability and decay resistance of the CSO-treated wood blocks were examined. Although CSO
was penetrated effectively into wood blocks of all wood species, the CSO-treatability was the highest in Western hemlock, followed by Japanese larch (LA), soft maple and Mongolian oak due to the difference of its anatomical structure.
Except for LA, the more retained, the more leached during a saline water-immersing process for 48h. The use of ethanol
added to reduce the viscosity of CSO affected negatively the treatability and leachability of wood blocks. Decay
resistance, which was evaluated by the weight loss of wood blocks exposed against Fomitopsis palustris (FOP) and
Trametes versicolor, of the CSO-treated/leached wood blocks was superior to that of control. Especially, most of wood
blocks treated with preserving solution composed of only CSO (CSO-2) did not decayed and showed a very low weight
loss against FOP. The decay resistance results from CSO retained in wood blocks after leaching. The retention of CSO
could identify using the observation of X-ray microscope. Length of wood strips, which were treated with CSO-2 and
then immersed in saline water for 2 weeks, hardly changed in all cutting directions. In addition, weight gain and lengthswelling rate of the wood strips were extremely low compared to those of control. These results indicate that moisture
resistance of the wood strips was improved by the CSO treatment. It is concluded that the treatment of CSO using a
vacuum-pressure method provides the decay resistance and dimensional stability of wood, and thus CSO can be used as
a natural wood preservative on various indoor and outdoor circumstances.
Keywords
References
2. Singh, T. and Singh, A. P., “A Review on Natural Products as Wood Protectant,” Wood Sci. Tech., 46(5), 851-870(2012).
3. González-Laredo, R. F., Rosales-Castro, M., Rocha-Guzmán, N.E., Gallegos-Infante, J. A., Moreno-Jiménez, M. R. and Karchesy,J. J., “Wood Preservation Using Natural Products,” Madera Bosques,21, 63-76(2015).
4. Šimůnková, K., Hýsek, Š., Reinprecht, L., Šobotník, J., Lišková,T. and Pánek, M., “Lavender Oil as Eco-friendly Alternative to Protect Wood against Termites without Negative Effect on Wood Properties,” Sci. Rep., 12, 1909(2022).
5. Sonderegger, W., Glaunsinger, M., Mannes, D., Volkmer, T. and Niemz, P., “Investigations into the Influence of Two Different Wood Coatings on Water Diffusion Determined by Means of Neutron Imaging,” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 73(6), 793-799(2015).
6. Hýsek, Š., Fidan, H., Pánek, M., Böhm, M. and Trgala, K., “Water Permeability of Exterior Wood Coatings: Waterborne Acrylate Dispersions for Windows,” J. Green Build., 13(3), 1-16(2018).
7. Meyer, L. and Brischke, C., “Fungal Decay at Different Moisture Levels of Selected European-grown Wood Species,” Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 103, 23-29(2015).
8. Terziev, N. and Panov, D., Plant Oils as Green Substances for Wood Protection. Minimising the Environmental Impact of the
Forest Products Industries, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 143-149(2011).
9. Humar, M. and Lesar, B., “Efficacy of Linseed- and Tung-oiltreated Wood against Wood-decay Fungi and Water Uptake,” Int.
Biodeter. Biodegr., 85, 223-227(2013).
10. Patachia, S. and Croitoru, C. Biopolymers for Wood Preservation.In Biopolymers and Biotech Admixtures for Eco-Efficient Construction Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 305-332(2016).
11. Oyewole, O. I., Owoseni, A. A. and Faboro, E. O., “Studies on Medicinal and Toxicological Properties of Cajanus cajan, Ricinus communis and Thymus vulgaris Leaf Extracts,” Res. J. Med. Plant,4, 2004-2006(2010).
12. Laredo, R. F. G., Castro, M. R., Guzmán, N. E. R., Infante, J. A.G., Moreno-Jiménez, M. R. and Karchesy, J. J., “Wood Preservation Using Natural Products,” Madera Bosques, 21, 63-76(2015).
13. Ibach, R. E. “Wood Handbook-Wood as an Engineering Material,” Gen. Tech. Replications. FPL-GTR-113. 463(1999).
14. Archer, K. and Lebow, S., In: J.C.F. Walker (Ed.), Primary Wood Processing: Principles and Practice: Wood Preservation, Springer Dordrecht, New York, 297-338(2006).
15. Kim, I. J., Nam, S. Y., Kim, M. J., Rho, C. W., Lee, J. G., Yun,T., Song, H. L. and Kim, H. S., “Growth Characteristics of Castor Bean (Ricinus communis L.) Collections,” Korean J. Plant Res.,22(1), 1-4(2009).
16. Grand View Research, Castor Oil & Derivatives Market Size,Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Sebacic Acid, 12-HAS),By Application (Lubricants, Surface Coatings, Biodiesel), By Region,And Segment Forecasts, 2022 - 2030(2022), https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/castor-oil-derivatives-industry(Assessed at Oct 04, 2022).
17. Momoh, A. O., Oladunmoye, M. K. and Adebolu, T. T., “Evaluation of the Antimicrobial and Phytochemical Properties of Oil from Castor Seeds (Ricinus communis Linn),” Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 1(10), 21-27(2012).
18. Ahmed, S., Fatima, R., Nisar, M. S. and Hassan, B., “Evaluation of Castor Bean Oil on Acacia Nilotica as Wood Preservative against
Odontotermes obesus (Ramb.) (Termitidae: Isoptera),” Int. Wood Prod. J., 5(1), 5-10(2014).
19. Adenaiya, A. O., Ogunsaqwo, O. Y. and Onakpoma, I., Weight Loss and Compressive Strength of Castor Oil-treated Pinus caribaea
(Morelet) Wood Exposed to Fungi,” Pro Ligno 12(4), 41-52(2016).
20. Ahmed, S., Fatima, R. and Babar Hassan, B., “Evaluation of Different Plant Derived Oils as Wood Preservatives against Subterranean Termite Odontotermes obesus”, Maderas-Cienc Technol.,22(1), 109-120(2020).
21. Var, A. A., Yalçin, M., Yalçin, Ö. Ü. and Demir, M., Effects of Hot-cold Oil Treatment on Biological Resistance and Physical Properties of Brutia Pine Sapwood,” Maderas-Cienc Technol.,23(42), 1-12(2021).
22. American Society for Testing and Materials, “Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Woodbase Materials,” ASTM D 4442-07(2005).
23. Effland, M. J., “Modified Procedure to Determine Acid-insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp,” Tappi, 6(10), 143e4(1977).
24. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. “Analytical Methods for Chemical Composition. 15th ed., Arlington, Academic Press,Inc.(1990).
25. American Society for Testing and Materials, “Standard Test Method for Ash in Biomass,” ASTM E 1755-01(2005).
26. Korean Industrial Standard, “Laboratory Test Method of Natural Decay Resistance of Wood,” KS F 2213(2018).
27. DeBell, D. S., Singleton, R., Gartner, B. L. and Marshall, D. D.,“Wood Density of Young-growth Western Hemlock: Relation to Ring Age, Radial Growth, Stand Density, and Site Quality,” Can. J. For. Res., 34, 2433-2442(2004).
28. Hwang, W. and Kim, N., “Utilization of Domestic Small Timbers:Shrinkage and Swelling of Alkali-treated Woods,” J. Kor. For.Energy, 18(2), 70-77(1999).
29. Park, Y., Han, Y., Park, J., Chang, Y., Yang, S., Chung, H., Kim.,K. and Yeo, H., “Evaluation of Physico-Mechanical Properties and Durability of Larix kaempferi Wood Heat-Treated by Hot Air,” J. Kor. Wood Sci. Technol., 43(3), 334-343(2015).
30. Meier, E., “Difference Between Hard Maple and Soft Maple,” (2022) https://www.wood-database.com/wood-articles/differences-betweenhard-maple-and-soft-maple/ [Assessed at August 12, 2022]
31. Nicholas, D. D. and Siau, J. F., Wood Deterioration and its Prevention by Preservatives Treatments: Factors Influencing the Treatability of Wood, Syracuse University Press, New York, 2,299-343(1973).
32. Schnabel, T., Barbu, M. C., Tudor, E. M. and Petutschnigg, A.,“Changing in Larch Sapwood Extractives Due to Distinct Ionizing Radiation Sources,” Materials (Basel), 14(7), 1613(2021).
33. Rayirath, P., “Some Aspects of Western Hemlock Air Permeability,” Master Thesis, The University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Colombia(2009).
34. Kedrov, G. B., “Functioning Wood,” Wulfenia, 19, 57-95(2012).
35. Luostarinen, K., Tracheid Wall Thickness and Lumen Diameter in Different Axial and Radial Locations in Cultivated Larix sibirica Trunks,” Silva Fenn., 46(5), 707-716(2012).
36. Mori, T., Sudo, S., Kawagishi, H. and Hirai, H., “Biodegradation of Diuron in Artificially Contaminated Water and Seawater by Wood
Colonized with the White-rot Fungus Trametes versicolor”, J.Wood Sci., 64, 690-696(2018).