Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELLING OF NON-NEWTONIAN FLUID FLOW IN A COAT-HANGER DIE
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, April 1995, 12(2), 236-243(8), 10.1007/BF02705652
Download PDF
Abstract
The three-dimensional model of isothermal flow of power-law fluid in a coat-hanger die has been developed using finite element method. The shape of coat-hanger die used in the present model was determined according to the previous analytical design equation which is based on one-dimensional flow model in the manifold and the slot. Because uniform flow rate across the die outlet is most important to achieve uniform thickness of extruded polymer sheet or film, flow rate distribution is mainly examined to determine the valid process condition for the design equation as the design parameters are changed. The effects of fluid property in terms of power-law index and process parameters not considered in one-dimensional design equation such as die inlet size and the presence of land were analyzed. Results show that the manifold angle is the most influencing design parameter on flow rate distribution. When the material of different power-law index from design value is processed, the change of power-law index affects the uniformity of flow rate appreciably.
Keywords
References
Arpin B, Lafleur PG, Vergnes B, Polym. Eng. Sci., 32, 206 (1992)
Booy ML, Polym. Eng. Sci., 22, 432 (1982)
Carley JF, J. Appl. Phys., 25, 1118 (1954)
Carley JF, Mod. Plast., 33, 127 (1956)
Fortin M, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 1, 347 (1981)
Gutfinger C, Broyer E, Tadmor Z, Polym. Eng. Sci., 15, 383 (1975)
Hood P, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 10, 379 (1976)
Huang CC, Tsay SY, Wang Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 33, 709 (1993)
Klein I, Klein R, SPE J., 29, 33 (1973)
Lee KY, Liu TJ, Polym. Eng. Sci., 29, 1066 (1989)
Liu TJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 22, 183 (1983)
Liu TJ, Hong CN, Chen KC, Polym. Eng. Sci., 28, 1517 (1988)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 19, 169 (1979)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 20, 212 (1980)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 20, 716 (1980)
Booy ML, Polym. Eng. Sci., 22, 432 (1982)
Carley JF, J. Appl. Phys., 25, 1118 (1954)
Carley JF, Mod. Plast., 33, 127 (1956)
Fortin M, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 1, 347 (1981)
Gutfinger C, Broyer E, Tadmor Z, Polym. Eng. Sci., 15, 383 (1975)
Hood P, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 10, 379 (1976)
Huang CC, Tsay SY, Wang Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 33, 709 (1993)
Klein I, Klein R, SPE J., 29, 33 (1973)
Lee KY, Liu TJ, Polym. Eng. Sci., 29, 1066 (1989)
Liu TJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 22, 183 (1983)
Liu TJ, Hong CN, Chen KC, Polym. Eng. Sci., 28, 1517 (1988)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 19, 169 (1979)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 20, 212 (1980)
Matsubara Y, Polym. Eng. Sci., 20, 716 (1980)