Articles & Issues
- Language
- English
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received February 26, 2009
Accepted May 10, 2009
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
Comparison of gamma ray and electron beam irradiations on the degradation of carboxymethylcellulose
Advanced Radiation Technology Institute, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeongeup 580-185, Korea 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 302-799 Korea
sjwlee@kaeri.re.kr
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, November 2009, 26(6), 1825-1828(4), 10.1007/s11814-009-0279-3
Download PDF
Abstract
Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) is used for a variety of applications due to its superior properties of high viscosity at a low concentration. In this study, the difference between a gamma ray (GR) irradiation from Co-60 and an electron beam (EB) irradiation with 10 MeV Energy on the viscosity change in CMC solution was compared. At the same irradiation doses, the viscosity of the CMC solution was more severely decreased by GR. Electron spin resonance spectroscopy revealed that the radicals in the CMC were more generated by GR, but there was no difference in the_x000D_
Fourier transform infrared spectra of both irradiated CMC solutions. Also, the degree of substitution in CMC was not changed by both irradiation events. From these results, it can be concluded that EB irradiation could better minimize the decrease in the viscosity of the solution with CMC for the sterilization than GR.
References
Sanford PA, Baird J, Industrial utilization of polysaccharides in: The polysaccharides, Ed. Aspinall GA, Academic Press, New York, 411 (1983)
Yang XH, Zhu WL, Cellulose, 14, 409 (2007)
Santa-Comba A, Pereira A, Lemos R, Santos D, Amarante J, Pinto M, J. Bio. Mater. Res., 55, 396 (2001)
von Sonntag C, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 67, 353 (2003)
Fei I, Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 78(2), 278 (2000)
Liu P, Zhai M, Li J, Peng J, Wu J, Phys. Chem., 63, 525 (2002)
Abramyan EA, Industrial electron accelerators and applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999)
Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81(12), 3030 (2001)
Capitani D, Porro F, Segre AL, Carbohyd. Res., 42, 283 (2000)
Ershov BG, Russian Chemical Reviews, 67, 315 (1998)
Wach RA, Mitomo H, Nagasawa N, Yoshii F, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 68, 771 (2003)
Ikada Y, Nakamura K, Ogata S, Makino K, Tajima K, Endoh N, Hayashi T, Fujita S, Fujisawa A, Masuda S, Oonish H, J. Polym. Sci., 37, 159 (2000)
Franco AP, Merce ALR, React. Funct. Polym., 66, 667 (2006)
Yang XH, Zhu WL, Cellulose, 14, 409 (2007)
Santa-Comba A, Pereira A, Lemos R, Santos D, Amarante J, Pinto M, J. Bio. Mater. Res., 55, 396 (2001)
von Sonntag C, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 67, 353 (2003)
Fei I, Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 78(2), 278 (2000)
Liu P, Zhai M, Li J, Peng J, Wu J, Phys. Chem., 63, 525 (2002)
Abramyan EA, Industrial electron accelerators and applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999)
Wach RA, Mitomo H, Yoshii F, Kume T, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81(12), 3030 (2001)
Capitani D, Porro F, Segre AL, Carbohyd. Res., 42, 283 (2000)
Ershov BG, Russian Chemical Reviews, 67, 315 (1998)
Wach RA, Mitomo H, Nagasawa N, Yoshii F, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 68, 771 (2003)
Ikada Y, Nakamura K, Ogata S, Makino K, Tajima K, Endoh N, Hayashi T, Fujita S, Fujisawa A, Masuda S, Oonish H, J. Polym. Sci., 37, 159 (2000)
Franco AP, Merce ALR, React. Funct. Polym., 66, 667 (2006)