A leaching kinetics was conducted for the purpose of recovery of praseodymium in sulfuric acid (H2SO4) from REE slag concentrated by the smelting reduction process in an arc furnace as a reactant. The concentration of H2SO4 was fixed at an excess ratio under the condition of slurry density of 1.500 g slag/L, 0.3 mol H2SO4, and the effect of temperatures was investigated under the condition of 30 to 80 oC. As a result, praseodymium oxide (Pr6O11) existing in the slag was completely converted into praseodymium sulfate (Pr2(SO4)3·8H2O) after the leaching of 5 h. On the basis of the shrinking core model with a shape of sphere, the first leaching reaction was determined by chemical reaction mechanism. Generally, the solubility of pure REEs decreases with the increase of leaching temperatures in sulfuric acid, but REE slag was oppositely increased with increasing temperatures. It occurs because the ash layer included in the slag is affected as a resistance against the leaching. By using the Arrhenius expression, the apparent activation energy of the first chemical reaction was determined to be 9.195 kJmol-1. In the second stage, the leaching rate is determined by the ash layer diffusion mechanism. The apparent activation energy of the second ash layer diffusion was determined to be 19.106 kJmol-1. These relative low activation energy values were obtained by the existence of unreacted ash layer in the REE slag.

Leaching REE Slag Shrinking Core Model Praseodymium Oxide Praseodymium Sulfate Sulfuric Acid

IUPAC, Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, IUPAC Recommendations 2005(“Red book”), RSC Publishing, Cambridge (UK), ISBN: 0-85404-438-8 (2005)
Antolini E, Perez J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(24), 15752 (2011)
Yu Z, Chen M, Rare Earth Elements and Their Applications, Metallurgical Industry Press (1995)
Massari S, Ruberti M, Resources Policy, 38, 36 (2013)
Aarabi-Karasgani M, Rashchi F, Mostoufi N, Vahidi E, Hydrometallurgy, 102, 14 (2010)
Dehghan R, Noaparast M, Kolahdoozan M, Hydrometallurgy, 96, 275 (2009)
El-Nadi YA, Hydrometallurgy, 119-120, 23 (2012)
Kim CJ, Yoon HS, Chung KW, Lee JY, Kim SD, Shin SM, Lee SJ, Joe AR, Lee SI, Yoo SJ, Kim SH, Hydrometallurgy, 146, 133 (2014)
Yoon HS, Kim CJ, Chung KW, Lee SJ, Joe AR, Shin YH, Lee SI, Yoo SJ, Kim JG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(4), 706 (2014)
Kostova I, Curr. Med. Chem., 5, 591 (2005)
Kul M, Topkaya Y, Karakaya I, Hydrometallurgy, 93, 129 (2008)
Liu K, Chen Q, Yin Z, Hu H, Ding Z, Hydrometallurgy, 125, 125 (2012)
Manhique AJ, Focke WW, Carvalho M, Hydrometallurgy, 109, 230 (2011)
Minting L, Chang W, Shuang Q, Xuejiao Z, Cunxiong L, Zhigan D, Hydrometallurgy, 104, 193 (2010)
Moldoveanu GA, Papangelakis VG, Hydrometallurgy, 117-118, 71 (2012)
Yoo SJ, Yoon HS, Jang HD, Lee MJ, Lee SI, Hong ST, Park HS, Chem. Eng. J., 133(1-3), 79 (2007)
Yoo SJ, Kwak DH, Lee JW, Hwang UY, Jang HD, Hydrometallurgy, 96, 223 (2009)
Levenspiel O, Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York (1999)
Schmidt LD, The Engineering of Chemical Reactions, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press (2005)
Dickinson CF, Heal GR, Thermochim. Acta, 340-341, 89 (1999)
Orfao JJM, Martins FG, Thermochim. Acta, 390(1-2), 195 (2002)
Akinlua A, Torto N, Ajayi TR, Fuel, 87(8-9), 1469 (2008)
Lichtfouse E (ed.), Organic Farming, Pest Control and Remediation of Soil Pollutants, Sustainable Agriculture Review 1, Springer Science+Business Media B.V (2009)
Clavier N, Podor R, Dacheux N, J. European Ceram. Soc., 31, 941 (2011)
HSC Chemistry 5.0 Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with Extensive Thermochemical Database. Ver 5.11, Outokumpu Research, Finland.