Articles & Issues
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.
All issues
분체의 표면적 측정법의 비교
Comparison of 3 Methods Determining Surface-area of Powders
HWAHAK KONGHAK, June 1971, 9(2), 97-104(8), NONE
Download PDF
Abstract
The specific surface-area of TiO2, SiO2 and CaCO3 powders are determined by 3 commonly used techniques. For rapid and inexpensive measurement of surface-area of a pigment such as titanium oxide, the photometric suspension method is more reliable than the air-permeability method, while the surface-area of some ceramic raw materials such as quartz and calcite powders may be determined in a better accuracy, 40 % more, by the latter than by the former.
In any case, the 2 methods mentioned above does not give any true surface-area, which must be determined only thru the BET method. For titanium oxide powder, the specific surface-area measured by the photometric method is 1/4 of that by the BET method, and for calcite powder, that measured by the airpermeability is 1/8 of that by the 1-point gas-adsorption method by areameter.
In any case, the 2 methods mentioned above does not give any true surface-area, which must be determined only thru the BET method. For titanium oxide powder, the specific surface-area measured by the photometric method is 1/4 of that by the BET method, and for calcite powder, that measured by the airpermeability is 1/8 of that by the 1-point gas-adsorption method by areameter.