ISSN: 0304-128X ISSN: 2233-9558
Copyright © 2024 KICHE. All rights reserved

Articles & Issues

Conflict of Interest
In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
articles This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © KIChE. All rights reserved.

All issues

분체의 표면적 측정법의 비교

Comparison of 3 Methods Determining Surface-area of Powders

HWAHAK KONGHAK, June 1971, 9(2), 97-104(8), NONE
downloadDownload PDF

Abstract

The specific surface-area of TiO2, SiO2 and CaCO3 powders are determined by 3 commonly used techniques. For rapid and inexpensive measurement of surface-area of a pigment such as titanium oxide, the photometric suspension method is more reliable than the air-permeability method, while the surface-area of some ceramic raw materials such as quartz and calcite powders may be determined in a better accuracy, 40 % more, by the latter than by the former.
In any case, the 2 methods mentioned above does not give any true surface-area, which must be determined only thru the BET method. For titanium oxide powder, the specific surface-area measured by the photometric method is 1/4 of that by the BET method, and for calcite powder, that measured by the airpermeability is 1/8 of that by the 1-point gas-adsorption method by areameter.

Keywords

The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. F5, 119, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 233 Spring Street Seoul 02856, South Korea.
Phone No. +82-2-458-3078FAX No. +82-507-804-0669E-mail : kiche@kiche.or.kr

Copyright (C) KICHE.all rights reserved.

- Korean Chemical Engineering Research 상단으로